Mailing List Archive

Hi,

I need to correct the results and apologize for a mistake I made : I
should have double checked the process before sending out the request
for voting.

http://www.xen.org/projects/governance.html says*"Voting:* The community
manager arranges a timed private vote as outlined above (voting should
be open for a minimum of a week). Any maintainer of a mature project and
the Xen.org community manager is allowed to vote. Voting follows the
conventions as laid out in 'Principle: Consensus Decision Making'."

This means that:
a) I miscommunicated who is elgible to vote : which are project leads,
committers and maintainers of mature projects, as well as the community
manager.
b) I tallied wrongly

I am summarizing the results again: the following people who fit the
criteria in a) can vote. Note that XCP does not have a defined list of
maintainers and committers, thus only the vote of the XCP's project lead
- Mike McClurg - counts. Eligible votes came from:

Ian Campbell
Mike McClurg
Jan Beulich
Lars Kurth
Tim Deegan
Ian Jackson

5 in favour, 1 abstained.

If no committer challenges by Friday, the vote will carry.

Regards
Lars

On 24/02/2013 03:10, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> sorry for the delay in posting the vote results for
> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Mirage_Incubation_Project_Proposal.
>
> The vote breakdown:
> - 6 out of 7 Xen committers voted (including project leads)
> - 5 were in favour
> - 1 abstained due to the "choice of the ISC licence rather than a
> copyleft licence such as LGPLv2+"
>
> So overall the vote carries.
>
> We also several other community members voting in support of the
> proposal. We also discussed the proposal at the last Xen Maintainer,
> Committer and Developer Meeting, which expressed support for the
> proposal.
>
> What happens next?
> I will work with the Mirage project lead on a detailed plan for the
> Incubation phase.
>
> Best Regards
> Lars