Mailing List Archive

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
Hi everyone,

The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the concerns and
questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have now added an
FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about the block
and what is being done. The project team is in the process of updating the
project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those pages to
your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.


Best,

Samir

[1] https://w.wiki/LEF

Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)

Community Brand and Marketing coordinator

Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>



On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com> wrote:

> This does have feeling of a company creating a financial relationship with
> the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban thats been
> reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many users who been
> blocked and help them become productive contributors but before they start
> making recommendation or decisions about who we are there needs to be
> something done to get them back to good standing with the community first
> untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to rebuild the hen
> house, I just dont see how I could support anything they recommend.
>
> After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped into the 2030
> strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that should have
> been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its comprehensible not
> to have known or explored that before deciding where, how, why we will be
> doing anything for the next 10 years.
>
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an unwillingness
> > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> >
> >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> >
> >
> > - d.
> >
> > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have seen so far, it
> > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on how we
> operate,
> > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and plan to spin
> > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with lots of buzz,
> > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe I am wrong,
> and
> > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the outside? Block
> > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the community.
> > > Cheers,
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On
> > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed personally at
> > > you, Essie.
> > >
> > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta deserved the
> > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward of resources
> > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this project is a
> > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important component of the
> > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF rebranding itself as
> > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the communities and
> > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance problems, and
> > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I don't think that
> > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't involve Snøhetta
> > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia, and I've been
> > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during the past few
> > > months.
> > >
> > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with this program
> > > in its current form.
> > >
> > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and spending associated
> > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view on whether
> > > this project should continue. If the community wants a branding
> > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on the project's
> > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should be involved.
> > >
> > > Pine
> > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
>
> --
> GN.
>
> *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> August
> hosted by ESEAP
>
> Wikimania: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> Noongarpedia: https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
Hoi,
The fact that it is considered major enough to address how Snøhetta became
blocked on English Wikipedia is ok. What is also does is confirm the bias
towards English Wikipedia. I am pretty sure that in the briefing of
Snøhetta personnel it was NOT mentioned that other projects may have
different policies, they substantially differ.

For me this whole process seems like a traintrack leading to a train wreck.
Wikipedia is not what *we *do, it is the brand Wikimedia is best known for.
Remember bias is not experienced and appreciated by the people who are
associated with what is dominant. I stated before how Wikipedia bias has
prevented us to move forward with our other "brands" and projects. I would
like some response on that.
Thanks,
GeradM

On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 00:16, Samir Elsharbaty <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the concerns and
> questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have now added an
> FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about the block
> and what is being done. The project team is in the process of updating the
> project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those pages to
> your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Samir
>
> [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
>
> Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
>
> Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
>
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial relationship
> with
> > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban thats been
> > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many users who been
> > blocked and help them become productive contributors but before they
> start
> > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there needs to be
> > something done to get them back to good standing with the community first
> > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to rebuild the hen
> > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they recommend.
> >
> > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped into the
> 2030
> > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that should have
> > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its comprehensible
> not
> > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how, why we will be
> > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an unwillingness
> > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > >
> > >
> > > - d.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have seen so far,
> it
> > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on how we
> > operate,
> > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and plan to spin
> > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with lots of
> buzz,
> > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe I am wrong,
> > and
> > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the outside? Block
> > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the community.
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> On
> > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed personally at
> > > > you, Essie.
> > > >
> > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta deserved the
> > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward of
> resources
> > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this project is a
> > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important component of the
> > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF rebranding itself
> as
> > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the communities and
> > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance problems, and
> > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I don't think
> that
> > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't involve Snøhetta
> > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia, and I've been
> > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during the past few
> > > > months.
> > > >
> > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with this program
> > > > in its current form.
> > > >
> > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and spending associated
> > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view on whether
> > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a branding
> > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on the
> project's
> > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should be involved.
> > > >
> > > > Pine
> > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > GN.
> >
> > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > August
> > hosted by ESEAP
> >
> > Wikimania: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > Noongarpedia: https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
Samir,

I don't think the "FAQ" gets the point. The "AQ" was if the "rebranding"
was acceptable. The answer was a resounding "no".

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020, 5:16 PM Samir Elsharbaty <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the concerns and
> questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have now added an
> FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about the block
> and what is being done. The project team is in the process of updating the
> project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those pages to
> your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Samir
>
> [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
>
> Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
>
> Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
>
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial relationship
> with
> > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban thats been
> > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many users who been
> > blocked and help them become productive contributors but before they
> start
> > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there needs to be
> > something done to get them back to good standing with the community first
> > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to rebuild the hen
> > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they recommend.
> >
> > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped into the
> 2030
> > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that should have
> > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its comprehensible
> not
> > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how, why we will be
> > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an unwillingness
> > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > >
> > >
> > > - d.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have seen so far,
> it
> > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on how we
> > operate,
> > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and plan to spin
> > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with lots of
> buzz,
> > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe I am wrong,
> > and
> > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the outside? Block
> > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the community.
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> On
> > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed personally at
> > > > you, Essie.
> > > >
> > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta deserved the
> > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward of
> resources
> > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this project is a
> > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important component of the
> > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF rebranding itself
> as
> > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the communities and
> > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance problems, and
> > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I don't think
> that
> > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't involve Snøhetta
> > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia, and I've been
> > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during the past few
> > > > months.
> > > >
> > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with this program
> > > > in its current form.
> > > >
> > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and spending associated
> > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view on whether
> > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a branding
> > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on the
> project's
> > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should be involved.
> > > >
> > > > Pine
> > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > GN.
> >
> > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > August
> > hosted by ESEAP
> >
> > Wikimania: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > Noongarpedia: https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and this is even
after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)


- d.

On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
<selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the concerns and
> questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have now added an
> FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about the block
> and what is being done. The project team is in the process of updating the
> project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those pages to
> your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Samir
>
> [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
>
> Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
>
> Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
>
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial relationship with
> > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban thats been
> > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many users who been
> > blocked and help them become productive contributors but before they start
> > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there needs to be
> > something done to get them back to good standing with the community first
> > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to rebuild the hen
> > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they recommend.
> >
> > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped into the 2030
> > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that should have
> > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its comprehensible not
> > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how, why we will be
> > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an unwillingness
> > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > >
> > >
> > > - d.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have seen so far, it
> > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on how we
> > operate,
> > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and plan to spin
> > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with lots of buzz,
> > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe I am wrong,
> > and
> > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the outside? Block
> > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the community.
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed personally at
> > > > you, Essie.
> > > >
> > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta deserved the
> > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward of resources
> > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this project is a
> > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important component of the
> > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF rebranding itself as
> > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the communities and
> > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance problems, and
> > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I don't think that
> > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't involve Snøhetta
> > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia, and I've been
> > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during the past few
> > > > months.
> > > >
> > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with this program
> > > > in its current form.
> > > >
> > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and spending associated
> > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view on whether
> > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a branding
> > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on the project's
> > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should be involved.
> > > >
> > > > Pine
> > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > GN.
> >
> > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > August
> > hosted by ESEAP
> >
> > Wikimania: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > Noongarpedia: https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
Hi All,

We wanted to follow up with a brief update on the project timeline and
share an invitation to join an event this month.

We know there continues to be so much uncertainty in the world, so we are
slowing down the process of the project. Big changes are happening to all
of us these days. We want to make sure that we respect the time and
priorities of the project collaborators. This means updating the project
timeline approach to have more flexibility for participants and smaller
time commitments [1], revising the project schedule month by month and
keeping the Brand Network [2] and other participants informed on a more
regular basis with any updates and changes. The naming discussions planned
for April are now pushed to May, at the earliest. Design proposals are
likewise shifted +4 weeks.

But we do have things to share:

*This month: live brand concept presentation!*

To honor, celebrate, and conclude the work around the concepts referred to
in Essie’s email above [3], Snohetta and the Brand Project team will
present the Unified Concept LIVE on 16 April, 15:00 - 16:00 GMT. Snøhetta
will explain how they used the ideas, feedback and conceptual models from
the workshops and online exercises to arrive at a final, unified concept.
This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming work around
the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall design system.
The session will also be recorded and made available for viewing after. You
can join us using these links. [4] Note: this is not a presentation of a
proposal for a naming convention or design.

Thank you!

Samir and the brand project team

[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline

[2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brand_Network

[3] https://brandingwikipedia.org/concepts/

[4] Join via Zoom:

https://wikimedia.zoom.us/j/769565325

Steam via Youtube Live:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q

Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)

Community Brand and Marketing coordinator

Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>



On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:32 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:

> The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and this is even
> after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)
>
>
> - d.
>
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
> <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the concerns and
> > questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have now added
> an
> > FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about the block
> > and what is being done. The project team is in the process of updating
> the
> > project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those pages to
> > your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Samir
> >
> > [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
> >
> > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> >
> > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> >
> > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial relationship
> with
> > > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban thats been
> > > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many users who been
> > > blocked and help them become productive contributors but before they
> start
> > > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there needs to be
> > > something done to get them back to good standing with the community
> first
> > > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to rebuild the
> hen
> > > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they recommend.
> > >
> > > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped into the
> 2030
> > > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that should have
> > > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its comprehensible
> not
> > > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how, why we will
> be
> > > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> > >
> > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an
> unwillingness
> > > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - d.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have seen so
> far, it
> > > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on how we
> > > operate,
> > > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and plan to
> spin
> > > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with lots of
> buzz,
> > > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe I am
> wrong,
> > > and
> > > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the outside?
> Block
> > > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the community.
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Peter
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> On
> > > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed personally
> at
> > > > > you, Essie.
> > > > >
> > > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta deserved the
> > > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward of
> resources
> > > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this project
> is a
> > > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important component of the
> > > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF rebranding
> itself as
> > > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the communities and
> > > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance problems,
> and
> > > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I don't think
> that
> > > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't involve Snøhetta
> > > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia, and I've
> been
> > > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during the past few
> > > > > months.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with this
> program
> > > > > in its current form.
> > > > >
> > > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and spending
> associated
> > > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view on
> whether
> > > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a branding
> > > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on the
> project's
> > > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should be
> involved.
> > > > >
> > > > > Pine
> > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > GN.
> > >
> > > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > > August
> > > hosted by ESEAP
> > >
> > > Wikimania: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > > Noongarpedia: https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
There is something called [[WP:IDHT,]] i.e. I didn't hear that.
No matter how many times, how many people (90% in the RFC) speak, I just
didn't hear that.
Kind regards,
(Comment in personal capacity)

Thanks


On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 00:15, Samir Elsharbaty <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> We wanted to follow up with a brief update on the project timeline and
> share an invitation to join an event this month.
>
> We know there continues to be so much uncertainty in the world, so we are
> slowing down the process of the project. Big changes are happening to all
> of us these days. We want to make sure that we respect the time and
> priorities of the project collaborators. This means updating the project
> timeline approach to have more flexibility for participants and smaller
> time commitments [1], revising the project schedule month by month and
> keeping the Brand Network [2] and other participants informed on a more
> regular basis with any updates and changes. The naming discussions planned
> for April are now pushed to May, at the earliest. Design proposals are
> likewise shifted +4 weeks.
>
> But we do have things to share:
>
> *This month: live brand concept presentation!*
>
> To honor, celebrate, and conclude the work around the concepts referred to
> in Essie’s email above [3], Snohetta and the Brand Project team will
> present the Unified Concept LIVE on 16 April, 15:00 - 16:00 GMT. Snøhetta
> will explain how they used the ideas, feedback and conceptual models from
> the workshops and online exercises to arrive at a final, unified concept.
> This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming work around
> the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall design system.
> The session will also be recorded and made available for viewing after. You
> can join us using these links. [4] Note: this is not a presentation of a
> proposal for a naming convention or design.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Samir and the brand project team
>
> [1]
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline
>
> [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brand_Network
>
> [3] https://brandingwikipedia.org/concepts/
>
> [4] Join via Zoom:
>
> https://wikimedia.zoom.us/j/769565325
>
> Steam via Youtube Live:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q
>
> Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
>
> Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
>
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:32 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and this is even
> > after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)
> >
> >
> > - d.
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
> > <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the concerns
> and
> > > questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have now added
> > an
> > > FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about the
> block
> > > and what is being done. The project team is in the process of updating
> > the
> > > project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those pages
> to
> > > your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Samir
> > >
> > > [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
> > >
> > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > >
> > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > >
> > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial relationship
> > with
> > > > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban thats
> been
> > > > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many users who
> been
> > > > blocked and help them become productive contributors but before they
> > start
> > > > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there needs to be
> > > > something done to get them back to good standing with the community
> > first
> > > > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to rebuild the
> > hen
> > > > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they recommend.
> > > >
> > > > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped into the
> > 2030
> > > > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that should
> have
> > > > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its
> comprehensible
> > not
> > > > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how, why we
> will
> > be
> > > > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an
> > unwillingness
> > > > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - d.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have seen so
> > far, it
> > > > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on how we
> > > > operate,
> > > > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and plan to
> > spin
> > > > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with lots of
> > buzz,
> > > > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe I am
> > wrong,
> > > > and
> > > > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the outside?
> > Block
> > > > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the
> community.
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Peter
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:
> wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> > On
> > > > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a
> movement?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed
> personally
> > at
> > > > > > you, Essie.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta deserved the
> > > > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward of
> > resources
> > > > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this project
> > is a
> > > > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important component of the
> > > > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF rebranding
> > itself as
> > > > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the communities
> and
> > > > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance problems,
> > and
> > > > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I don't think
> > that
> > > > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't involve
> Snøhetta
> > > > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia, and I've
> > been
> > > > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during the past
> few
> > > > > > months.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with this
> > program
> > > > > > in its current form.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and spending
> > associated
> > > > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view on
> > whether
> > > > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a branding
> > > > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on the
> > project's
> > > > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should be
> > involved.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Pine
> > > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > GN.
> > > >
> > > > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > > > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > > > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > > > August
> > > > hosted by ESEAP
> > > >
> > > > Wikimania: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > > > Noongarpedia: https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
In all honesty, this should not have been directed at Samir. I do not think
he has the authority to stop the process. And whoever has probably spends
more time in Twitter that in Wikimedia projects.

Best
Yaroslav

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:12 AM Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com> wrote:

> There is something called [[WP:IDHT,]] i.e. I didn't hear that.
> No matter how many times, how many people (90% in the RFC) speak, I just
> didn't hear that.
> Kind regards,
> (Comment in personal capacity)
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 00:15, Samir Elsharbaty <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We wanted to follow up with a brief update on the project timeline and
> > share an invitation to join an event this month.
> >
> > We know there continues to be so much uncertainty in the world, so we are
> > slowing down the process of the project. Big changes are happening to all
> > of us these days. We want to make sure that we respect the time and
> > priorities of the project collaborators. This means updating the project
> > timeline approach to have more flexibility for participants and smaller
> > time commitments [1], revising the project schedule month by month and
> > keeping the Brand Network [2] and other participants informed on a more
> > regular basis with any updates and changes. The naming discussions
> planned
> > for April are now pushed to May, at the earliest. Design proposals are
> > likewise shifted +4 weeks.
> >
> > But we do have things to share:
> >
> > *This month: live brand concept presentation!*
> >
> > To honor, celebrate, and conclude the work around the concepts referred
> to
> > in Essie’s email above [3], Snohetta and the Brand Project team will
> > present the Unified Concept LIVE on 16 April, 15:00 - 16:00 GMT. Snøhetta
> > will explain how they used the ideas, feedback and conceptual models from
> > the workshops and online exercises to arrive at a final, unified concept.
> > This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming work around
> > the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall design system.
> > The session will also be recorded and made available for viewing after.
> You
> > can join us using these links. [4] Note: this is not a presentation of a
> > proposal for a naming convention or design.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Samir and the brand project team
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline
> >
> > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brand_Network
> >
> > [3] https://brandingwikipedia.org/concepts/
> >
> > [4] Join via Zoom:
> >
> > https://wikimedia.zoom.us/j/769565325
> >
> > Steam via Youtube Live:
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q
> >
> > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> >
> > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> >
> > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:32 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and this is even
> > > after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.
> > >
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_%28company%29>
> > >
> > >
> > > - d.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
> > > <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the concerns
> > and
> > > > questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have now
> added
> > > an
> > > > FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about the
> > block
> > > > and what is being done. The project team is in the process of
> updating
> > > the
> > > > project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those pages
> > to
> > > > your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > >
> > > > Samir
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
> > > >
> > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > >
> > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > >
> > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial
> relationship
> > > with
> > > > > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban thats
> > been
> > > > > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many users who
> > been
> > > > > blocked and help them become productive contributors but before
> they
> > > start
> > > > > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there needs to
> be
> > > > > something done to get them back to good standing with the community
> > > first
> > > > > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to rebuild
> the
> > > hen
> > > > > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they
> recommend.
> > > > >
> > > > > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped into
> the
> > > 2030
> > > > > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that should
> > have
> > > > > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its
> > comprehensible
> > > not
> > > > > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how, why we
> > will
> > > be
> > > > > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an
> > > unwillingness
> > > > > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - d.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have seen so
> > > far, it
> > > > > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on how we
> > > > > operate,
> > > > > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and plan
> to
> > > spin
> > > > > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with lots
> of
> > > buzz,
> > > > > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe I am
> > > wrong,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the outside?
> > > Block
> > > > > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the
> > community.
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:
> > wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> > > On
> > > > > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a
> > movement?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed
> > personally
> > > at
> > > > > > > you, Essie.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta deserved
> the
> > > > > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward of
> > > resources
> > > > > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this
> project
> > > is a
> > > > > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important component of
> the
> > > > > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF rebranding
> > > itself as
> > > > > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the communities
> > and
> > > > > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance
> problems,
> > > and
> > > > > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I don't
> think
> > > that
> > > > > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't involve
> > Snøhetta
> > > > > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia, and I've
> > > been
> > > > > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during the past
> > few
> > > > > > > months.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with this
> > > program
> > > > > > > in its current form.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and spending
> > > associated
> > > > > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view on
> > > whether
> > > > > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a branding
> > > > > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on the
> > > project's
> > > > > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should be
> > > involved.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pine
> > > > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > GN.
> > > > >
> > > > > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > > > > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > > > > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > > > > August
> > > > > hosted by ESEAP
> > > > >
> > > > > Wikimania: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > > > > Noongarpedia:
> https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > > > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
When you speak for someone who is hard of listening, it is an occupational hazard that you will be shouted at occasionally by those whose voices are being ignored. It is not necessarily anything personal, just part of the heat in the kitchen.
Cheers,
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Yaroslav Blanter
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 11:28 AM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?

In all honesty, this should not have been directed at Samir. I do not think
he has the authority to stop the process. And whoever has probably spends
more time in Twitter that in Wikimedia projects.

Best
Yaroslav

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:12 AM Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com> wrote:

> There is something called [[WP:IDHT,]] i.e. I didn't hear that.
> No matter how many times, how many people (90% in the RFC) speak, I just
> didn't hear that.
> Kind regards,
> (Comment in personal capacity)
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 00:15, Samir Elsharbaty <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We wanted to follow up with a brief update on the project timeline and
> > share an invitation to join an event this month.
> >
> > We know there continues to be so much uncertainty in the world, so we are
> > slowing down the process of the project. Big changes are happening to all
> > of us these days. We want to make sure that we respect the time and
> > priorities of the project collaborators. This means updating the project
> > timeline approach to have more flexibility for participants and smaller
> > time commitments [1], revising the project schedule month by month and
> > keeping the Brand Network [2] and other participants informed on a more
> > regular basis with any updates and changes. The naming discussions
> planned
> > for April are now pushed to May, at the earliest. Design proposals are
> > likewise shifted +4 weeks.
> >
> > But we do have things to share:
> >
> > *This month: live brand concept presentation!*
> >
> > To honor, celebrate, and conclude the work around the concepts referred
> to
> > in Essie’s email above [3], Snohetta and the Brand Project team will
> > present the Unified Concept LIVE on 16 April, 15:00 - 16:00 GMT. Snøhetta
> > will explain how they used the ideas, feedback and conceptual models from
> > the workshops and online exercises to arrive at a final, unified concept.
> > This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming work around
> > the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall design system.
> > The session will also be recorded and made available for viewing after.
> You
> > can join us using these links. [4] Note: this is not a presentation of a
> > proposal for a naming convention or design.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Samir and the brand project team
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline
> >
> > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brand_Network
> >
> > [3] https://brandingwikipedia.org/concepts/
> >
> > [4] Join via Zoom:
> >
> > https://wikimedia.zoom.us/j/769565325
> >
> > Steam via Youtube Live:
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q
> >
> > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> >
> > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> >
> > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:32 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and this is even
> > > after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.
> > >
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_%28company%29>
> > >
> > >
> > > - d.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
> > > <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the concerns
> > and
> > > > questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have now
> added
> > > an
> > > > FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about the
> > block
> > > > and what is being done. The project team is in the process of
> updating
> > > the
> > > > project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those pages
> > to
> > > > your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > >
> > > > Samir
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
> > > >
> > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > >
> > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > >
> > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial
> relationship
> > > with
> > > > > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban thats
> > been
> > > > > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many users who
> > been
> > > > > blocked and help them become productive contributors but before
> they
> > > start
> > > > > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there needs to
> be
> > > > > something done to get them back to good standing with the community
> > > first
> > > > > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to rebuild
> the
> > > hen
> > > > > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they
> recommend.
> > > > >
> > > > > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped into
> the
> > > 2030
> > > > > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that should
> > have
> > > > > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its
> > comprehensible
> > > not
> > > > > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how, why we
> > will
> > > be
> > > > > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an
> > > unwillingness
> > > > > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - d.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have seen so
> > > far, it
> > > > > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on how we
> > > > > operate,
> > > > > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and plan
> to
> > > spin
> > > > > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with lots
> of
> > > buzz,
> > > > > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe I am
> > > wrong,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the outside?
> > > Block
> > > > > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the
> > community.
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:
> > wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> > > On
> > > > > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a
> > movement?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed
> > personally
> > > at
> > > > > > > you, Essie.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta deserved
> the
> > > > > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward of
> > > resources
> > > > > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this
> project
> > > is a
> > > > > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important component of
> the
> > > > > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF rebranding
> > > itself as
> > > > > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the communities
> > and
> > > > > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance
> problems,
> > > and
> > > > > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I don't
> think
> > > that
> > > > > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't involve
> > Snøhetta
> > > > > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia, and I've
> > > been
> > > > > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during the past
> > few
> > > > > > > months.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with this
> > > program
> > > > > > > in its current form.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and spending
> > > associated
> > > > > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view on
> > > whether
> > > > > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a branding
> > > > > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on the
> > > project's
> > > > > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should be
> > > involved.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pine
> > > > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > GN.
> > > > >
> > > > > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > > > > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > > > > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > > > > August
> > > > > hosted by ESEAP
> > > > >
> > > > > Wikimania: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > > > > Noongarpedia:
> https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > > > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
Yes. Who's the person telling Samir to post this stuff, which comes
across as aggressively ignoring all feedback to date? Could we have a
word with them here?


- d.

On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 14:12, Peter Southwood
<peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
>
> When you speak for someone who is hard of listening, it is an occupational hazard that you will be shouted at occasionally by those whose voices are being ignored. It is not necessarily anything personal, just part of the heat in the kitchen.
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Yaroslav Blanter
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 11:28 AM
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
>
> In all honesty, this should not have been directed at Samir. I do not think
> he has the authority to stop the process. And whoever has probably spends
> more time in Twitter that in Wikimedia projects.
>
> Best
> Yaroslav
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:12 AM Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There is something called [[WP:IDHT,]] i.e. I didn't hear that.
> > No matter how many times, how many people (90% in the RFC) speak, I just
> > didn't hear that.
> > Kind regards,
> > (Comment in personal capacity)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 00:15, Samir Elsharbaty <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > We wanted to follow up with a brief update on the project timeline and
> > > share an invitation to join an event this month.
> > >
> > > We know there continues to be so much uncertainty in the world, so we are
> > > slowing down the process of the project. Big changes are happening to all
> > > of us these days. We want to make sure that we respect the time and
> > > priorities of the project collaborators. This means updating the project
> > > timeline approach to have more flexibility for participants and smaller
> > > time commitments [1], revising the project schedule month by month and
> > > keeping the Brand Network [2] and other participants informed on a more
> > > regular basis with any updates and changes. The naming discussions
> > planned
> > > for April are now pushed to May, at the earliest. Design proposals are
> > > likewise shifted +4 weeks.
> > >
> > > But we do have things to share:
> > >
> > > *This month: live brand concept presentation!*
> > >
> > > To honor, celebrate, and conclude the work around the concepts referred
> > to
> > > in Essie’s email above [3], Snohetta and the Brand Project team will
> > > present the Unified Concept LIVE on 16 April, 15:00 - 16:00 GMT. Snøhetta
> > > will explain how they used the ideas, feedback and conceptual models from
> > > the workshops and online exercises to arrive at a final, unified concept.
> > > This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming work around
> > > the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall design system.
> > > The session will also be recorded and made available for viewing after.
> > You
> > > can join us using these links. [4] Note: this is not a presentation of a
> > > proposal for a naming convention or design.
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> > >
> > > Samir and the brand project team
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline
> > >
> > > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brand_Network
> > >
> > > [3] https://brandingwikipedia.org/concepts/
> > >
> > > [4] Join via Zoom:
> > >
> > > https://wikimedia.zoom.us/j/769565325
> > >
> > > Steam via Youtube Live:
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q
> > >
> > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > >
> > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > >
> > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:32 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and this is even
> > > > after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.
> > > >
> > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)
> > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_%28company%29>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - d.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
> > > > <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the concerns
> > > and
> > > > > questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have now
> > added
> > > > an
> > > > > FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about the
> > > block
> > > > > and what is being done. The project team is in the process of
> > updating
> > > > the
> > > > > project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those pages
> > > to
> > > > > your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > >
> > > > > Samir
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
> > > > >
> > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > >
> > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > >
> > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial
> > relationship
> > > > with
> > > > > > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban thats
> > > been
> > > > > > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many users who
> > > been
> > > > > > blocked and help them become productive contributors but before
> > they
> > > > start
> > > > > > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there needs to
> > be
> > > > > > something done to get them back to good standing with the community
> > > > first
> > > > > > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to rebuild
> > the
> > > > hen
> > > > > > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they
> > recommend.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped into
> > the
> > > > 2030
> > > > > > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that should
> > > have
> > > > > > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its
> > > comprehensible
> > > > not
> > > > > > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how, why we
> > > will
> > > > be
> > > > > > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an
> > > > unwillingness
> > > > > > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - d.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > > > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have seen so
> > > > far, it
> > > > > > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on how we
> > > > > > operate,
> > > > > > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and plan
> > to
> > > > spin
> > > > > > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with lots
> > of
> > > > buzz,
> > > > > > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe I am
> > > > wrong,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the outside?
> > > > Block
> > > > > > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the
> > > community.
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:
> > > wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> > > > On
> > > > > > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a
> > > movement?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed
> > > personally
> > > > at
> > > > > > > > you, Essie.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta deserved
> > the
> > > > > > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward of
> > > > resources
> > > > > > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this
> > project
> > > > is a
> > > > > > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important component of
> > the
> > > > > > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF rebranding
> > > > itself as
> > > > > > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the communities
> > > and
> > > > > > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance
> > problems,
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I don't
> > think
> > > > that
> > > > > > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't involve
> > > Snøhetta
> > > > > > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia, and I've
> > > > been
> > > > > > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during the past
> > > few
> > > > > > > > months.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with this
> > > > program
> > > > > > > > in its current form.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and spending
> > > > associated
> > > > > > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view on
> > > > whether
> > > > > > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a branding
> > > > > > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on the
> > > > project's
> > > > > > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should be
> > > > involved.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Pine
> > > > > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > GN.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > > > > > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > > > > > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > > > > > August
> > > > > > hosted by ESEAP
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wikimania: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > > > > > Noongarpedia:
> > https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > > > > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
Hi, the Brand team has been watching the RfC and has written a summary
about it [1] that was shared both in the RfC [2] and the project page [3]
in Meta. The team has integrated the feedback of the RfC in the development
process, just as we did with the activities organized by the project
itself.

The RfC is covered in the main project page as well as in the FAQ [4]. The
RfC has been a recurrent topic of discussion in the Brand project talk page
[5], where we are answering questions and discussing topics whenever they
are posted. We recommend you to have a look at these updates before making
further conclusions here.

The RfC is about the use of the word “Wikipedia” in the name of the
Foundation, and by extension the names of affiliates were discussed as
well. The project team has clarified that many options for a naming
convention are being explored. While having Wikipedia as a central concept
is a project requirement, It is very unlikely that any naming convention
proposal will be based on a simple substitution of the word "Wikimedia"
with the word "Wikipedia". Brand systems offer many more possibilities.

Another important point to clarify is that the proposals for naming
conventions haven’t been defined yet. According to the project timeline
[6], several proposals for a naming convention will be shared with the
communities for feedback in May, at the earliest. At the end of this
review, one proposal will be selected and refined. You can check the
timeline to learn about further phases with public reviews before the full
proposal for a brand system is presented to the Wikimedia Foundation
leadership and the Board.

[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/RfC_Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia

[2]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia#Report_about_this_RfC_by_the_Brand_Project_team

[3]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project

[4]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/FAQ

[5]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project




Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)

Community Brand and Marketing coordinator

Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>



On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 1:12 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes. Who's the person telling Samir to post this stuff, which comes
> across as aggressively ignoring all feedback to date? Could we have a
> word with them here?
>
>
> - d.
>
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 14:12, Peter Southwood
> <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> >
> > When you speak for someone who is hard of listening, it is an
> occupational hazard that you will be shouted at occasionally by those whose
> voices are being ignored. It is not necessarily anything personal, just
> part of the heat in the kitchen.
> > Cheers,
> > Peter
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On
> Behalf Of Yaroslav Blanter
> > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 11:28 AM
> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
> >
> > In all honesty, this should not have been directed at Samir. I do not
> think
> > he has the authority to stop the process. And whoever has probably spends
> > more time in Twitter that in Wikimedia projects.
> >
> > Best
> > Yaroslav
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:12 AM Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > There is something called [[WP:IDHT,]] i.e. I didn't hear that.
> > > No matter how many times, how many people (90% in the RFC) speak, I
> just
> > > didn't hear that.
> > > Kind regards,
> > > (Comment in personal capacity)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 00:15, Samir Elsharbaty <
> selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > We wanted to follow up with a brief update on the project timeline
> and
> > > > share an invitation to join an event this month.
> > > >
> > > > We know there continues to be so much uncertainty in the world, so
> we are
> > > > slowing down the process of the project. Big changes are happening
> to all
> > > > of us these days. We want to make sure that we respect the time and
> > > > priorities of the project collaborators. This means updating the
> project
> > > > timeline approach to have more flexibility for participants and
> smaller
> > > > time commitments [1], revising the project schedule month by month
> and
> > > > keeping the Brand Network [2] and other participants informed on a
> more
> > > > regular basis with any updates and changes. The naming discussions
> > > planned
> > > > for April are now pushed to May, at the earliest. Design proposals
> are
> > > > likewise shifted +4 weeks.
> > > >
> > > > But we do have things to share:
> > > >
> > > > *This month: live brand concept presentation!*
> > > >
> > > > To honor, celebrate, and conclude the work around the concepts
> referred
> > > to
> > > > in Essie’s email above [3], Snohetta and the Brand Project team will
> > > > present the Unified Concept LIVE on 16 April, 15:00 - 16:00 GMT.
> Snøhetta
> > > > will explain how they used the ideas, feedback and conceptual models
> from
> > > > the workshops and online exercises to arrive at a final, unified
> concept.
> > > > This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming work
> around
> > > > the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall design
> system.
> > > > The session will also be recorded and made available for viewing
> after.
> > > You
> > > > can join us using these links. [4] Note: this is not a presentation
> of a
> > > > proposal for a naming convention or design.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you!
> > > >
> > > > Samir and the brand project team
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline
> > > >
> > > > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brand_Network
> > > >
> > > > [3] https://brandingwikipedia.org/concepts/
> > > >
> > > > [4] Join via Zoom:
> > > >
> > > > https://wikimedia.zoom.us/j/769565325
> > > >
> > > > Steam via Youtube Live:
> > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q
> > > >
> > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > >
> > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > >
> > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:32 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and this is
> even
> > > > > after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)
> > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_%28company%29>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - d.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
> > > > > <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the
> concerns
> > > > and
> > > > > > questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have now
> > > added
> > > > > an
> > > > > > FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about
> the
> > > > block
> > > > > > and what is being done. The project team is in the process of
> > > updating
> > > > > the
> > > > > > project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those
> pages
> > > > to
> > > > > > your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Samir
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial
> > > relationship
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban
> thats
> > > > been
> > > > > > > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many users
> who
> > > > been
> > > > > > > blocked and help them become productive contributors but before
> > > they
> > > > > start
> > > > > > > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there
> needs to
> > > be
> > > > > > > something done to get them back to good standing with the
> community
> > > > > first
> > > > > > > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to
> rebuild
> > > the
> > > > > hen
> > > > > > > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they
> > > recommend.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped
> into
> > > the
> > > > > 2030
> > > > > > > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that
> should
> > > > have
> > > > > > > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its
> > > > comprehensible
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how, why
> we
> > > > will
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an
> > > > > unwillingness
> > > > > > > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - d.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > > > > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have
> seen so
> > > > > far, it
> > > > > > > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on
> how we
> > > > > > > operate,
> > > > > > > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and
> plan
> > > to
> > > > > spin
> > > > > > > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with
> lots
> > > of
> > > > > buzz,
> > > > > > > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe
> I am
> > > > > wrong,
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the
> outside?
> > > > > Block
> > > > > > > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the
> > > > community.
> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:
> > > > wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> > > > > On
> > > > > > > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > > > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a
> > > > movement?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed
> > > > personally
> > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > you, Essie.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta
> deserved
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward
> of
> > > > > resources
> > > > > > > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this
> > > project
> > > > > is a
> > > > > > > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important component
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF
> rebranding
> > > > > itself as
> > > > > > > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the
> communities
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance
> > > problems,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I don't
> > > think
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't involve
> > > > Snøhetta
> > > > > > > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia, and
> I've
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during the
> past
> > > > few
> > > > > > > > > months.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with
> this
> > > > > program
> > > > > > > > > in its current form.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and spending
> > > > > associated
> > > > > > > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view
> on
> > > > > whether
> > > > > > > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a
> branding
> > > > > > > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on
> the
> > > > > project's
> > > > > > > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should be
> > > > > involved.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Pine
> > > > > > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > GN.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > > > > > > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > > > > > > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > > > > > > August
> > > > > > > hosted by ESEAP
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Wikimania: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > > > > > > Noongarpedia:
> > > https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > > > > > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
Sorry dropped footnote #[6] while sending:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline

Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)

Community Brand and Marketing coordinator

Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>



On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 10:22 AM Samir Elsharbaty <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
wrote:

> Hi, the Brand team has been watching the RfC and has written a summary
> about it [1] that was shared both in the RfC [2] and the project page [3]
> in Meta. The team has integrated the feedback of the RfC in the development
> process, just as we did with the activities organized by the project
> itself.
>
> The RfC is covered in the main project page as well as in the FAQ [4]. The
> RfC has been a recurrent topic of discussion in the Brand project talk page
> [5], where we are answering questions and discussing topics whenever they
> are posted. We recommend you to have a look at these updates before making
> further conclusions here.
>
> The RfC is about the use of the word “Wikipedia” in the name of the
> Foundation, and by extension the names of affiliates were discussed as
> well. The project team has clarified that many options for a naming
> convention are being explored. While having Wikipedia as a central concept
> is a project requirement, It is very unlikely that any naming convention
> proposal will be based on a simple substitution of the word "Wikimedia"
> with the word "Wikipedia". Brand systems offer many more possibilities.
>
> Another important point to clarify is that the proposals for naming
> conventions haven’t been defined yet. According to the project timeline
> [6], several proposals for a naming convention will be shared with the
> communities for feedback in May, at the earliest. At the end of this
> review, one proposal will be selected and refined. You can check the
> timeline to learn about further phases with public reviews before the full
> proposal for a brand system is presented to the Wikimedia Foundation
> leadership and the Board.
>
> [1]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/RfC_Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia
>
> [2]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia#Report_about_this_RfC_by_the_Brand_Project_team
>
> [3]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
>
> [4]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/FAQ
>
> [5]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
>
>
>
>
> Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
>
> Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
>
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 1:12 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes. Who's the person telling Samir to post this stuff, which comes
>> across as aggressively ignoring all feedback to date? Could we have a
>> word with them here?
>>
>>
>> - d.
>>
>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 14:12, Peter Southwood
>> <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > When you speak for someone who is hard of listening, it is an
>> occupational hazard that you will be shouted at occasionally by those whose
>> voices are being ignored. It is not necessarily anything personal, just
>> part of the heat in the kitchen.
>> > Cheers,
>> > Peter
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On
>> Behalf Of Yaroslav Blanter
>> > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 11:28 AM
>> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
>> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
>> >
>> > In all honesty, this should not have been directed at Samir. I do not
>> think
>> > he has the authority to stop the process. And whoever has probably
>> spends
>> > more time in Twitter that in Wikimedia projects.
>> >
>> > Best
>> > Yaroslav
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:12 AM Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > There is something called [[WP:IDHT,]] i.e. I didn't hear that.
>> > > No matter how many times, how many people (90% in the RFC) speak, I
>> just
>> > > didn't hear that.
>> > > Kind regards,
>> > > (Comment in personal capacity)
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 00:15, Samir Elsharbaty <
>> selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi All,
>> > > >
>> > > > We wanted to follow up with a brief update on the project timeline
>> and
>> > > > share an invitation to join an event this month.
>> > > >
>> > > > We know there continues to be so much uncertainty in the world, so
>> we are
>> > > > slowing down the process of the project. Big changes are happening
>> to all
>> > > > of us these days. We want to make sure that we respect the time and
>> > > > priorities of the project collaborators. This means updating the
>> project
>> > > > timeline approach to have more flexibility for participants and
>> smaller
>> > > > time commitments [1], revising the project schedule month by month
>> and
>> > > > keeping the Brand Network [2] and other participants informed on a
>> more
>> > > > regular basis with any updates and changes. The naming discussions
>> > > planned
>> > > > for April are now pushed to May, at the earliest. Design proposals
>> are
>> > > > likewise shifted +4 weeks.
>> > > >
>> > > > But we do have things to share:
>> > > >
>> > > > *This month: live brand concept presentation!*
>> > > >
>> > > > To honor, celebrate, and conclude the work around the concepts
>> referred
>> > > to
>> > > > in Essie’s email above [3], Snohetta and the Brand Project team will
>> > > > present the Unified Concept LIVE on 16 April, 15:00 - 16:00 GMT.
>> Snøhetta
>> > > > will explain how they used the ideas, feedback and conceptual
>> models from
>> > > > the workshops and online exercises to arrive at a final, unified
>> concept.
>> > > > This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming work
>> around
>> > > > the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall design
>> system.
>> > > > The session will also be recorded and made available for viewing
>> after.
>> > > You
>> > > > can join us using these links. [4] Note: this is not a presentation
>> of a
>> > > > proposal for a naming convention or design.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you!
>> > > >
>> > > > Samir and the brand project team
>> > > >
>> > > > [1]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline
>> > > >
>> > > > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brand_Network
>> > > >
>> > > > [3] https://brandingwikipedia.org/concepts/
>> > > >
>> > > > [4] Join via Zoom:
>> > > >
>> > > > https://wikimedia.zoom.us/j/769565325
>> > > >
>> > > > Steam via Youtube Live:
>> > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q
>> > > >
>> > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
>> > > >
>> > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
>> > > >
>> > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:32 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and this is
>> even
>> > > > > after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)
>> > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_%28company%29>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - d.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
>> > > > > <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi everyone,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the
>> concerns
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have
>> now
>> > > added
>> > > > > an
>> > > > > > FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about
>> the
>> > > > block
>> > > > > > and what is being done. The project team is in the process of
>> > > updating
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those
>> pages
>> > > > to
>> > > > > > your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Samir
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial
>> > > relationship
>> > > > > with
>> > > > > > > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban
>> thats
>> > > > been
>> > > > > > > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many
>> users who
>> > > > been
>> > > > > > > blocked and help them become productive contributors but
>> before
>> > > they
>> > > > > start
>> > > > > > > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there
>> needs to
>> > > be
>> > > > > > > something done to get them back to good standing with the
>> community
>> > > > > first
>> > > > > > > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to
>> rebuild
>> > > the
>> > > > > hen
>> > > > > > > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they
>> > > recommend.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped
>> into
>> > > the
>> > > > > 2030
>> > > > > > > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that
>> should
>> > > > have
>> > > > > > > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its
>> > > > comprehensible
>> > > > > not
>> > > > > > > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how,
>> why we
>> > > > will
>> > > > > be
>> > > > > > > doing anything for the next 10 years.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an
>> > > > > unwillingness
>> > > > > > > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > - d.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
>> > > > > > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have
>> seen so
>> > > > > far, it
>> > > > > > > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on
>> how we
>> > > > > > > operate,
>> > > > > > > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and
>> plan
>> > > to
>> > > > > spin
>> > > > > > > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with
>> lots
>> > > of
>> > > > > buzz,
>> > > > > > > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe
>> I am
>> > > > > wrong,
>> > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the
>> outside?
>> > > > > Block
>> > > > > > > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the
>> > > > community.
>> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > > Peter
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:
>> > > > wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
>> > > > > On
>> > > > > > > > Behalf Of Pine W
>> > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
>> > > > > > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
>> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a
>> > > > movement?
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Hello,
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed
>> > > > personally
>> > > > > at
>> > > > > > > > > you, Essie.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta
>> deserved
>> > > the
>> > > > > > > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward
>> of
>> > > > > resources
>> > > > > > > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this
>> > > project
>> > > > > is a
>> > > > > > > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important
>> component of
>> > > the
>> > > > > > > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF
>> rebranding
>> > > > > itself as
>> > > > > > > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the
>> communities
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance
>> > > problems,
>> > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I
>> don't
>> > > think
>> > > > > that
>> > > > > > > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't involve
>> > > > Snøhetta
>> > > > > > > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia,
>> and I've
>> > > > > been
>> > > > > > > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during
>> the past
>> > > > few
>> > > > > > > > > months.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with
>> this
>> > > > > program
>> > > > > > > > > in its current form.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and spending
>> > > > > associated
>> > > > > > > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view
>> on
>> > > > > whether
>> > > > > > > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a
>> branding
>> > > > > > > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on
>> the
>> > > > > project's
>> > > > > > > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should
>> be
>> > > > > involved.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Pine
>> > > > > > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>> and
>> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
>> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>> and
>> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
>> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>> and
>> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
>> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > GN.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
>> > > > > > > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
>> > > > > > > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
>> > > > > > > August
>> > > > > > > hosted by ESEAP
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Wikimania:
>> https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
>> > > > > > > Noongarpedia:
>> > > https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
>> > > > > > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
>> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
>> > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
>> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
>> ?subject=unsubscribe>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > > > > Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
>> ?subject=unsubscribe>
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > > > Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
>> ?subject=unsubscribe>
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>> ,
>> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 09:49, Samir Elsharbaty
<selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:

> While having Wikipedia as a central concept
> is a project requirement,

... and here we have the source of all the problems here: the answer
has been predetermined.


- d.

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
This is a reply Shamir, but it is more a reply to the process and Wikimedia
Foundation.

Reading [1] my immediate thought is that whoever wrote it is more focused
on reputing the core finding than respecting the outcome. It is a reaction
to the statement “We do not know what the Wikimedia Foundation’s new name
would be, only that it would utilize Wikipedia not Wikimedia.” and 91% says
“no”. Still the process continues as nothing has happen. When 91% opposes a
change in volunteer organization you stop and listen, this is an earthquake.

I opposed the name change, even if I don't really agree with the RFC, but
what happen later I find perhaps more troublesome. This shows a real lack
of understanding of why people objected to the idea. People have said no to
this several times now, and the process continues like nothing has happen.
Someone must clarify what this is, and who is behind it, and why, because
as it is now the chance of onboarding the communities are virtually zero.

As it is now I would say call it a failure, and make a full halt.

[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/RfC_Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia

John Erling Blad
/jeblad

On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 10:49 AM Samir Elsharbaty <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
wrote:

> Hi, the Brand team has been watching the RfC and has written a summary
> about it [1] that was shared both in the RfC [2] and the project page [3]
> in Meta. The team has integrated the feedback of the RfC in the development
> process, just as we did with the activities organized by the project
> itself.
>
> The RfC is covered in the main project page as well as in the FAQ [4]. The
> RfC has been a recurrent topic of discussion in the Brand project talk page
> [5], where we are answering questions and discussing topics whenever they
> are posted. We recommend you to have a look at these updates before making
> further conclusions here.
>
> The RfC is about the use of the word “Wikipedia” in the name of the
> Foundation, and by extension the names of affiliates were discussed as
> well. The project team has clarified that many options for a naming
> convention are being explored. While having Wikipedia as a central concept
> is a project requirement, It is very unlikely that any naming convention
> proposal will be based on a simple substitution of the word "Wikimedia"
> with the word "Wikipedia". Brand systems offer many more possibilities.
>
> Another important point to clarify is that the proposals for naming
> conventions haven’t been defined yet. According to the project timeline
> [6], several proposals for a naming convention will be shared with the
> communities for feedback in May, at the earliest. At the end of this
> review, one proposal will be selected and refined. You can check the
> timeline to learn about further phases with public reviews before the full
> proposal for a brand system is presented to the Wikimedia Foundation
> leadership and the Board.
>
> [1]
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/RfC_Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia
>
> [2]
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia#Report_about_this_RfC_by_the_Brand_Project_team
>
> [3]
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
>
> [4]
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/FAQ
>
> [5]
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
>
>
>
>
> Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
>
> Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
>
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 1:12 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes. Who's the person telling Samir to post this stuff, which comes
> > across as aggressively ignoring all feedback to date? Could we have a
> > word with them here?
> >
> >
> > - d.
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 14:12, Peter Southwood
> > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > When you speak for someone who is hard of listening, it is an
> > occupational hazard that you will be shouted at occasionally by those
> whose
> > voices are being ignored. It is not necessarily anything personal, just
> > part of the heat in the kitchen.
> > > Cheers,
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On
> > Behalf Of Yaroslav Blanter
> > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 11:28 AM
> > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
> > >
> > > In all honesty, this should not have been directed at Samir. I do not
> > think
> > > he has the authority to stop the process. And whoever has probably
> spends
> > > more time in Twitter that in Wikimedia projects.
> > >
> > > Best
> > > Yaroslav
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:12 AM Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There is something called [[WP:IDHT,]] i.e. I didn't hear that.
> > > > No matter how many times, how many people (90% in the RFC) speak, I
> > just
> > > > didn't hear that.
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > (Comment in personal capacity)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 00:15, Samir Elsharbaty <
> > selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > We wanted to follow up with a brief update on the project timeline
> > and
> > > > > share an invitation to join an event this month.
> > > > >
> > > > > We know there continues to be so much uncertainty in the world, so
> > we are
> > > > > slowing down the process of the project. Big changes are happening
> > to all
> > > > > of us these days. We want to make sure that we respect the time and
> > > > > priorities of the project collaborators. This means updating the
> > project
> > > > > timeline approach to have more flexibility for participants and
> > smaller
> > > > > time commitments [1], revising the project schedule month by month
> > and
> > > > > keeping the Brand Network [2] and other participants informed on a
> > more
> > > > > regular basis with any updates and changes. The naming discussions
> > > > planned
> > > > > for April are now pushed to May, at the earliest. Design proposals
> > are
> > > > > likewise shifted +4 weeks.
> > > > >
> > > > > But we do have things to share:
> > > > >
> > > > > *This month: live brand concept presentation!*
> > > > >
> > > > > To honor, celebrate, and conclude the work around the concepts
> > referred
> > > > to
> > > > > in Essie’s email above [3], Snohetta and the Brand Project team
> will
> > > > > present the Unified Concept LIVE on 16 April, 15:00 - 16:00 GMT.
> > Snøhetta
> > > > > will explain how they used the ideas, feedback and conceptual
> models
> > from
> > > > > the workshops and online exercises to arrive at a final, unified
> > concept.
> > > > > This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming work
> > around
> > > > > the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall design
> > system.
> > > > > The session will also be recorded and made available for viewing
> > after.
> > > > You
> > > > > can join us using these links. [4] Note: this is not a presentation
> > of a
> > > > > proposal for a naming convention or design.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you!
> > > > >
> > > > > Samir and the brand project team
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline
> > > > >
> > > > > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brand_Network
> > > > >
> > > > > [3] https://brandingwikipedia.org/concepts/
> > > > >
> > > > > [4] Join via Zoom:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://wikimedia.zoom.us/j/769565325
> > > > >
> > > > > Steam via Youtube Live:
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q
> > > > >
> > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > >
> > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > >
> > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:32 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and this is
> > even
> > > > > > after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)
> > > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_%28company%29>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - d.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
> > > > > > <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the
> > concerns
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have
> now
> > > > added
> > > > > > an
> > > > > > > FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about
> > the
> > > > > block
> > > > > > > and what is being done. The project team is in the process of
> > > > updating
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those
> > pages
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Samir
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial
> > > > relationship
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban
> > thats
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many
> users
> > who
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > > blocked and help them become productive contributors but
> before
> > > > they
> > > > > > start
> > > > > > > > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there
> > needs to
> > > > be
> > > > > > > > something done to get them back to good standing with the
> > community
> > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to
> > rebuild
> > > > the
> > > > > > hen
> > > > > > > > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they
> > > > recommend.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped
> > into
> > > > the
> > > > > > 2030
> > > > > > > > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that
> > should
> > > > > have
> > > > > > > > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its
> > > > > comprehensible
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how,
> why
> > we
> > > > > will
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <
> dgerard@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an
> > > > > > unwillingness
> > > > > > > > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - d.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > > > > > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have
> > seen so
> > > > > > far, it
> > > > > > > > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on
> > how we
> > > > > > > > operate,
> > > > > > > > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and
> > plan
> > > > to
> > > > > > spin
> > > > > > > > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with
> > lots
> > > > of
> > > > > > buzz,
> > > > > > > > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe
> > I am
> > > > > > wrong,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the
> > outside?
> > > > > > Block
> > > > > > > > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the
> > > > > community.
> > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:
> > > > > wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> > > > > > On
> > > > > > > > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > > > > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a
> > > > > movement?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed
> > > > > personally
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > > you, Essie.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta
> > deserved
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward
> > of
> > > > > > resources
> > > > > > > > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this
> > > > project
> > > > > > is a
> > > > > > > > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important
> component
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF
> > rebranding
> > > > > > itself as
> > > > > > > > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the
> > communities
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance
> > > > problems,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I
> don't
> > > > think
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't
> involve
> > > > > Snøhetta
> > > > > > > > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia,
> and
> > I've
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during
> the
> > past
> > > > > few
> > > > > > > > > > months.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with
> > this
> > > > > > program
> > > > > > > > > > in its current form.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and
> spending
> > > > > > associated
> > > > > > > > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view
> > on
> > > > > > whether
> > > > > > > > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a
> > branding
> > > > > > > > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on
> > the
> > > > > > project's
> > > > > > > > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should
> be
> > > > > > involved.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Pine
> > > > > > > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> and
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> and
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> and
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > GN.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > > > > > > > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > > > > > > > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > > > > > > > August
> > > > > > > > hosted by ESEAP
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Wikimania:
> https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > > > > > > > Noongarpedia:
> > > > https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > > > > > > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
Since the process has decided its not hearing that the community doesnt
want the change why continue to pretend the communities input or interest
in the project is even wanted.

On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 17:25, John Erling Blad <jeblad@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a reply Shamir, but it is more a reply to the process and Wikimedia
> Foundation.
>
> Reading [1] my immediate thought is that whoever wrote it is more focused
> on reputing the core finding than respecting the outcome. It is a reaction
> to the statement “We do not know what the Wikimedia Foundation’s new name
> would be, only that it would utilize Wikipedia not Wikimedia.” and 91% says
> “no”. Still the process continues as nothing has happen. When 91% opposes a
> change in volunteer organization you stop and listen, this is an
> earthquake.
>
> I opposed the name change, even if I don't really agree with the RFC, but
> what happen later I find perhaps more troublesome. This shows a real lack
> of understanding of why people objected to the idea. People have said no to
> this several times now, and the process continues like nothing has happen.
> Someone must clarify what this is, and who is behind it, and why, because
> as it is now the chance of onboarding the communities are virtually zero.
>
> As it is now I would say call it a failure, and make a full halt.
>
> [1]
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/RfC_Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia
>
> John Erling Blad
> /jeblad
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 10:49 AM Samir Elsharbaty <
> selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, the Brand team has been watching the RfC and has written a summary
> > about it [1] that was shared both in the RfC [2] and the project page [3]
> > in Meta. The team has integrated the feedback of the RfC in the
> development
> > process, just as we did with the activities organized by the project
> > itself.
> >
> > The RfC is covered in the main project page as well as in the FAQ [4].
> The
> > RfC has been a recurrent topic of discussion in the Brand project talk
> page
> > [5], where we are answering questions and discussing topics whenever they
> > are posted. We recommend you to have a look at these updates before
> making
> > further conclusions here.
> >
> > The RfC is about the use of the word “Wikipedia” in the name of the
> > Foundation, and by extension the names of affiliates were discussed as
> > well. The project team has clarified that many options for a naming
> > convention are being explored. While having Wikipedia as a central
> concept
> > is a project requirement, It is very unlikely that any naming convention
> > proposal will be based on a simple substitution of the word "Wikimedia"
> > with the word "Wikipedia". Brand systems offer many more possibilities.
> >
> > Another important point to clarify is that the proposals for naming
> > conventions haven’t been defined yet. According to the project timeline
> > [6], several proposals for a naming convention will be shared with the
> > communities for feedback in May, at the earliest. At the end of this
> > review, one proposal will be selected and refined. You can check the
> > timeline to learn about further phases with public reviews before the
> full
> > proposal for a brand system is presented to the Wikimedia Foundation
> > leadership and the Board.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/RfC_Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia
> >
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia#Report_about_this_RfC_by_the_Brand_Project_team
> >
> > [3]
> >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
> >
> > [4]
> >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/FAQ
> >
> > [5]
> >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> >
> > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> >
> > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 1:12 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes. Who's the person telling Samir to post this stuff, which comes
> > > across as aggressively ignoring all feedback to date? Could we have a
> > > word with them here?
> > >
> > >
> > > - d.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 14:12, Peter Southwood
> > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When you speak for someone who is hard of listening, it is an
> > > occupational hazard that you will be shouted at occasionally by those
> > whose
> > > voices are being ignored. It is not necessarily anything personal, just
> > > part of the heat in the kitchen.
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> On
> > > Behalf Of Yaroslav Blanter
> > > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 11:28 AM
> > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
> > > >
> > > > In all honesty, this should not have been directed at Samir. I do not
> > > think
> > > > he has the authority to stop the process. And whoever has probably
> > spends
> > > > more time in Twitter that in Wikimedia projects.
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > Yaroslav
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:12 AM Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > There is something called [[WP:IDHT,]] i.e. I didn't hear that.
> > > > > No matter how many times, how many people (90% in the RFC) speak, I
> > > just
> > > > > didn't hear that.
> > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > (Comment in personal capacity)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 00:15, Samir Elsharbaty <
> > > selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We wanted to follow up with a brief update on the project
> timeline
> > > and
> > > > > > share an invitation to join an event this month.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We know there continues to be so much uncertainty in the world,
> so
> > > we are
> > > > > > slowing down the process of the project. Big changes are
> happening
> > > to all
> > > > > > of us these days. We want to make sure that we respect the time
> and
> > > > > > priorities of the project collaborators. This means updating the
> > > project
> > > > > > timeline approach to have more flexibility for participants and
> > > smaller
> > > > > > time commitments [1], revising the project schedule month by
> month
> > > and
> > > > > > keeping the Brand Network [2] and other participants informed on
> a
> > > more
> > > > > > regular basis with any updates and changes. The naming
> discussions
> > > > > planned
> > > > > > for April are now pushed to May, at the earliest. Design
> proposals
> > > are
> > > > > > likewise shifted +4 weeks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But we do have things to share:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *This month: live brand concept presentation!*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To honor, celebrate, and conclude the work around the concepts
> > > referred
> > > > > to
> > > > > > in Essie’s email above [3], Snohetta and the Brand Project team
> > will
> > > > > > present the Unified Concept LIVE on 16 April, 15:00 - 16:00 GMT.
> > > Snøhetta
> > > > > > will explain how they used the ideas, feedback and conceptual
> > models
> > > from
> > > > > > the workshops and online exercises to arrive at a final, unified
> > > concept.
> > > > > > This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming
> work
> > > around
> > > > > > the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall design
> > > system.
> > > > > > The session will also be recorded and made available for viewing
> > > after.
> > > > > You
> > > > > > can join us using these links. [4] Note: this is not a
> presentation
> > > of a
> > > > > > proposal for a naming convention or design.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Samir and the brand project team
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brand_Network
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [3] https://brandingwikipedia.org/concepts/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [4] Join via Zoom:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://wikimedia.zoom.us/j/769565325
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Steam via Youtube Live:
> > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:32 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and this
> is
> > > even
> > > > > > > after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)
> > > > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_%28company%29>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - d.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
> > > > > > > <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the
> > > concerns
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have
> > now
> > > > > added
> > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details
> about
> > > the
> > > > > > block
> > > > > > > > and what is being done. The project team is in the process of
> > > > > updating
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add
> those
> > > pages
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Samir
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <
> gnangarra@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial
> > > > > relationship
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban
> > > thats
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many
> > users
> > > who
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > blocked and help them become productive contributors but
> > before
> > > > > they
> > > > > > > start
> > > > > > > > > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there
> > > needs to
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > something done to get them back to good standing with the
> > > community
> > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to
> > > rebuild
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > hen
> > > > > > > > > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they
> > > > > recommend.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been
> pumped
> > > into
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > 2030
> > > > > > > > > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that
> > > should
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its
> > > > > > comprehensible
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how,
> > why
> > > we
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <
> > dgerard@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an
> > > > > > > unwillingness
> > > > > > > > > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > - d.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > > > > > > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have
> > > seen so
> > > > > > > far, it
> > > > > > > > > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework
> on
> > > how we
> > > > > > > > > operate,
> > > > > > > > > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care,
> and
> > > plan
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > spin
> > > > > > > > > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages
> with
> > > lots
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > buzz,
> > > > > > > > > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid.
> Maybe
> > > I am
> > > > > > > wrong,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the
> > > outside?
> > > > > > > Block
> > > > > > > > > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the
> > > > > > community.
> > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:
> > > > > > wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> > > > > > > On
> > > > > > > > > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we
> as a
> > > > > > movement?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed
> > > > > > personally
> > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > > > you, Essie.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta
> > > deserved
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good
> steward
> > > of
> > > > > > > resources
> > > > > > > > > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that
> this
> > > > > project
> > > > > > > is a
> > > > > > > > > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important
> > component
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF
> > > rebranding
> > > > > > > itself as
> > > > > > > > > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the
> > > communities
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance
> > > > > problems,
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I
> > don't
> > > > > think
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't
> > involve
> > > > > > Snøhetta
> > > > > > > > > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia,
> > and
> > > I've
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during
> > the
> > > past
> > > > > > few
> > > > > > > > > > > months.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with
> > > this
> > > > > > > program
> > > > > > > > > > > in its current form.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and
> > spending
> > > > > > > associated
> > > > > > > > > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's
> view
> > > on
> > > > > > > whether
> > > > > > > > > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a
> > > branding
> > > > > > > > > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide
> on
> > > the
> > > > > > > project's
> > > > > > > > > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant
> should
> > be
> > > > > > > involved.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Pine
> > > > > > > > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > and
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > and
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > and
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > GN.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > > > > > > > > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > > > > > > > > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > > > > > > > > August
> > > > > > > > > hosted by ESEAP
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Wikimania:
> > https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > > > > > > > > Noongarpedia:
> > > > > https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > > > > > > > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> and
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>



--
GN.

*Power of Diverse Collaboration*
*Sharing knowledge brings people together*
Wikimania Bangkok 2021
August
hosted by ESEAP

Wikimania: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
Noongarpedia: https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
Photo Printing: https://gnangarra.redbubble.com
<http://gnangarra.redbubble.com>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
More complicated.

The process has been managed as a "pure" marketing and communication
process while it concerns more community management.

I don't see here (honestly) any community management.

Knd regards

On 11/04/2020 12:27, Gnangarra wrote:
> Since the process has decided its not hearing that the community doesnt
> want the change why continue to pretend the communities input or interest
> in the project is even wanted.
>
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 17:25, John Erling Blad <jeblad@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is a reply Shamir, but it is more a reply to the process and Wikimedia
>> Foundation.
>>
>> Reading [1] my immediate thought is that whoever wrote it is more focused
>> on reputing the core finding than respecting the outcome. It is a reaction
>> to the statement “We do not know what the Wikimedia Foundation’s new name
>> would be, only that it would utilize Wikipedia not Wikimedia.” and 91% says
>> “no”. Still the process continues as nothing has happen. When 91% opposes a
>> change in volunteer organization you stop and listen, this is an
>> earthquake.
>>
>> I opposed the name change, even if I don't really agree with the RFC, but
>> what happen later I find perhaps more troublesome. This shows a real lack
>> of understanding of why people objected to the idea. People have said no to
>> this several times now, and the process continues like nothing has happen.
>> Someone must clarify what this is, and who is behind it, and why, because
>> as it is now the chance of onboarding the communities are virtually zero.
>>
>> As it is now I would say call it a failure, and make a full halt.
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/RfC_Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia
>>
>> John Erling Blad
>> /jeblad
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 10:49 AM Samir Elsharbaty <
>> selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>
>
--
Ilario Valdelli
Wikimedia CH
Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens
Association pour l’avancement des connaissances libre
Associazione per il sostegno alla conoscenza libera
Switzerland - 8008 Zürich
Wikipedia: Ilario
Skype: valdelli
Tel: +41764821371
http://www.wikimedia.ch


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
Hello,
My comments are in a personal capacity, and kindly note my posts are not
directed towards anyone specifically/at all. Sincere thanks for
understanding these two points.

" We recommend you to have a look at these updates before making further
conclusions here.
-- Thanks for the recommendation. Kindly do not assume that we are not
reading the updates "before making further conclusions here".

" the Brand team has been watching the RfC and has written a summary about
it"
--Yes, RfC needs a closure/summary, from which we get action points. Now,
there is something called WP:INVOLVED. Someone who is
supporting/opposing/promoting/demoting an idea or in other words someone
who is "involved" often may not close or summarise a debate/discussion with
due weight to all the arguments. As a result, conclusions may be faulty,
and action points may not reflect the actual opinion of the RfC. Example
below.

FAQ: Why is this project moving forward after the RfC resulted in clear
majority opposition?
(
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/FAQ#Why_is_this_project_moving_forward_after_the_RfC_resulted_in_clear_majority_opposition
?)
-- Even after reading the answer I also don't understand "why?" A point I
get there is "exploring further options". On the report page, "What is
happening with the feedback?" (intended action points section perhaps) is
taking me to FAQ page. From the FAQ page the last paragraph sends me back
to the report page, making it a loop.

" The team has integrated the feedback of the RfC in the development
process, just as we did with the activities organized by the project
itself. "
-- unlike other statements here any footnote or reference is not given.
Would love to learn what are those activities and how was the RfC feedback
integrated into the agenda/activity. (Please note that I have read the
brand workshop report.)

That's all for now, with regards, and good wishes during the global
pandemic time,
User:Titodutta


On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 14:19, Samir Elsharbaty <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
wrote:

> Hi, the Brand team has been watching the RfC and has written a summary
> about it [1] that was shared both in the RfC [2] and the project page [3]
> in Meta. The team has integrated the feedback of the RfC in the development
> process, just as we did with the activities organized by the project
> itself.
>
> The RfC is covered in the main project page as well as in the FAQ [4]. The
> RfC has been a recurrent topic of discussion in the Brand project talk page
> [5], where we are answering questions and discussing topics whenever they
> are posted. We recommend you to have a look at these updates before making
> further conclusions here.
>
> The RfC is about the use of the word “Wikipedia” in the name of the
> Foundation, and by extension the names of affiliates were discussed as
> well. The project team has clarified that many options for a naming
> convention are being explored. While having Wikipedia as a central concept
> is a project requirement, It is very unlikely that any naming convention
> proposal will be based on a simple substitution of the word "Wikimedia"
> with the word "Wikipedia". Brand systems offer many more possibilities.
>
> Another important point to clarify is that the proposals for naming
> conventions haven’t been defined yet. According to the project timeline
> [6], several proposals for a naming convention will be shared with the
> communities for feedback in May, at the earliest. At the end of this
> review, one proposal will be selected and refined. You can check the
> timeline to learn about further phases with public reviews before the full
> proposal for a brand system is presented to the Wikimedia Foundation
> leadership and the Board.
>
> [1]
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/RfC_Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia
>
> [2]
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia#Report_about_this_RfC_by_the_Brand_Project_team
>
> [3]
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
>
> [4]
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/FAQ
>
> [5]
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
>
>
>
>
> Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
>
> Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
>
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 1:12 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes. Who's the person telling Samir to post this stuff, which comes
> > across as aggressively ignoring all feedback to date? Could we have a
> > word with them here?
> >
> >
> > - d.
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 14:12, Peter Southwood
> > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > When you speak for someone who is hard of listening, it is an
> > occupational hazard that you will be shouted at occasionally by those
> whose
> > voices are being ignored. It is not necessarily anything personal, just
> > part of the heat in the kitchen.
> > > Cheers,
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On
> > Behalf Of Yaroslav Blanter
> > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 11:28 AM
> > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
> > >
> > > In all honesty, this should not have been directed at Samir. I do not
> > think
> > > he has the authority to stop the process. And whoever has probably
> spends
> > > more time in Twitter that in Wikimedia projects.
> > >
> > > Best
> > > Yaroslav
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:12 AM Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There is something called [[WP:IDHT,]] i.e. I didn't hear that.
> > > > No matter how many times, how many people (90% in the RFC) speak, I
> > just
> > > > didn't hear that.
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > (Comment in personal capacity)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 00:15, Samir Elsharbaty <
> > selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > We wanted to follow up with a brief update on the project timeline
> > and
> > > > > share an invitation to join an event this month.
> > > > >
> > > > > We know there continues to be so much uncertainty in the world, so
> > we are
> > > > > slowing down the process of the project. Big changes are happening
> > to all
> > > > > of us these days. We want to make sure that we respect the time and
> > > > > priorities of the project collaborators. This means updating the
> > project
> > > > > timeline approach to have more flexibility for participants and
> > smaller
> > > > > time commitments [1], revising the project schedule month by month
> > and
> > > > > keeping the Brand Network [2] and other participants informed on a
> > more
> > > > > regular basis with any updates and changes. The naming discussions
> > > > planned
> > > > > for April are now pushed to May, at the earliest. Design proposals
> > are
> > > > > likewise shifted +4 weeks.
> > > > >
> > > > > But we do have things to share:
> > > > >
> > > > > *This month: live brand concept presentation!*
> > > > >
> > > > > To honor, celebrate, and conclude the work around the concepts
> > referred
> > > > to
> > > > > in Essie’s email above [3], Snohetta and the Brand Project team
> will
> > > > > present the Unified Concept LIVE on 16 April, 15:00 - 16:00 GMT.
> > Snøhetta
> > > > > will explain how they used the ideas, feedback and conceptual
> models
> > from
> > > > > the workshops and online exercises to arrive at a final, unified
> > concept.
> > > > > This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming work
> > around
> > > > > the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall design
> > system.
> > > > > The session will also be recorded and made available for viewing
> > after.
> > > > You
> > > > > can join us using these links. [4] Note: this is not a presentation
> > of a
> > > > > proposal for a naming convention or design.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you!
> > > > >
> > > > > Samir and the brand project team
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline
> > > > >
> > > > > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brand_Network
> > > > >
> > > > > [3] https://brandingwikipedia.org/concepts/
> > > > >
> > > > > [4] Join via Zoom:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://wikimedia.zoom.us/j/769565325
> > > > >
> > > > > Steam via Youtube Live:
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q
> > > > >
> > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > >
> > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > >
> > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:32 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and this is
> > even
> > > > > > after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)
> > > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_%28company%29>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - d.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
> > > > > > <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the
> > concerns
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have
> now
> > > > added
> > > > > > an
> > > > > > > FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about
> > the
> > > > > block
> > > > > > > and what is being done. The project team is in the process of
> > > > updating
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those
> > pages
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Samir
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial
> > > > relationship
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban
> > thats
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many
> users
> > who
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > > blocked and help them become productive contributors but
> before
> > > > they
> > > > > > start
> > > > > > > > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there
> > needs to
> > > > be
> > > > > > > > something done to get them back to good standing with the
> > community
> > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to
> > rebuild
> > > > the
> > > > > > hen
> > > > > > > > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they
> > > > recommend.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped
> > into
> > > > the
> > > > > > 2030
> > > > > > > > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that
> > should
> > > > > have
> > > > > > > > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its
> > > > > comprehensible
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how,
> why
> > we
> > > > > will
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <
> dgerard@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an
> > > > > > unwillingness
> > > > > > > > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - d.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > > > > > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have
> > seen so
> > > > > > far, it
> > > > > > > > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on
> > how we
> > > > > > > > operate,
> > > > > > > > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and
> > plan
> > > > to
> > > > > > spin
> > > > > > > > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with
> > lots
> > > > of
> > > > > > buzz,
> > > > > > > > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe
> > I am
> > > > > > wrong,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the
> > outside?
> > > > > > Block
> > > > > > > > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the
> > > > > community.
> > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:
> > > > > wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> > > > > > On
> > > > > > > > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > > > > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a
> > > > > movement?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed
> > > > > personally
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > > you, Essie.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta
> > deserved
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward
> > of
> > > > > > resources
> > > > > > > > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this
> > > > project
> > > > > > is a
> > > > > > > > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important
> component
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF
> > rebranding
> > > > > > itself as
> > > > > > > > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the
> > communities
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance
> > > > problems,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I
> don't
> > > > think
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't
> involve
> > > > > Snøhetta
> > > > > > > > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia,
> and
> > I've
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during
> the
> > past
> > > > > few
> > > > > > > > > > months.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with
> > this
> > > > > > program
> > > > > > > > > > in its current form.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and
> spending
> > > > > > associated
> > > > > > > > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view
> > on
> > > > > > whether
> > > > > > > > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a
> > branding
> > > > > > > > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on
> > the
> > > > > > project's
> > > > > > > > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should
> be
> > > > > > involved.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Pine
> > > > > > > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> and
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> and
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> and
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > GN.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > > > > > > > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > > > > > > > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > > > > > > > August
> > > > > > > > hosted by ESEAP
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Wikimania:
> https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > > > > > > > Noongarpedia:
> > > > https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > > > > > > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
I think at this point, someone needs to answer: who has predetermined
this outcome?

It's clear nobody at (say) Samir's level can or will answer this
question - just repeat the same things again, as if nobody ever
objected.

So precisely who is so gung-ho for this idea?


- d.

On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 13:58, Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> My comments are in a personal capacity, and kindly note my posts are not
> directed towards anyone specifically/at all. Sincere thanks for
> understanding these two points.
>
> " We recommend you to have a look at these updates before making further
> conclusions here.
> -- Thanks for the recommendation. Kindly do not assume that we are not
> reading the updates "before making further conclusions here".
>
> " the Brand team has been watching the RfC and has written a summary about
> it"
> --Yes, RfC needs a closure/summary, from which we get action points. Now,
> there is something called WP:INVOLVED. Someone who is
> supporting/opposing/promoting/demoting an idea or in other words someone
> who is "involved" often may not close or summarise a debate/discussion with
> due weight to all the arguments. As a result, conclusions may be faulty,
> and action points may not reflect the actual opinion of the RfC. Example
> below.
>
> FAQ: Why is this project moving forward after the RfC resulted in clear
> majority opposition?
> (
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/FAQ#Why_is_this_project_moving_forward_after_the_RfC_resulted_in_clear_majority_opposition
> ?)
> -- Even after reading the answer I also don't understand "why?" A point I
> get there is "exploring further options". On the report page, "What is
> happening with the feedback?" (intended action points section perhaps) is
> taking me to FAQ page. From the FAQ page the last paragraph sends me back
> to the report page, making it a loop.
>
> " The team has integrated the feedback of the RfC in the development
> process, just as we did with the activities organized by the project
> itself. "
> -- unlike other statements here any footnote or reference is not given.
> Would love to learn what are those activities and how was the RfC feedback
> integrated into the agenda/activity. (Please note that I have read the
> brand workshop report.)
>
> That's all for now, with regards, and good wishes during the global
> pandemic time,
> User:Titodutta
>
>
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 14:19, Samir Elsharbaty <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, the Brand team has been watching the RfC and has written a summary
> > about it [1] that was shared both in the RfC [2] and the project page [3]
> > in Meta. The team has integrated the feedback of the RfC in the development
> > process, just as we did with the activities organized by the project
> > itself.
> >
> > The RfC is covered in the main project page as well as in the FAQ [4]. The
> > RfC has been a recurrent topic of discussion in the Brand project talk page
> > [5], where we are answering questions and discussing topics whenever they
> > are posted. We recommend you to have a look at these updates before making
> > further conclusions here.
> >
> > The RfC is about the use of the word “Wikipedia” in the name of the
> > Foundation, and by extension the names of affiliates were discussed as
> > well. The project team has clarified that many options for a naming
> > convention are being explored. While having Wikipedia as a central concept
> > is a project requirement, It is very unlikely that any naming convention
> > proposal will be based on a simple substitution of the word "Wikimedia"
> > with the word "Wikipedia". Brand systems offer many more possibilities.
> >
> > Another important point to clarify is that the proposals for naming
> > conventions haven’t been defined yet. According to the project timeline
> > [6], several proposals for a naming convention will be shared with the
> > communities for feedback in May, at the earliest. At the end of this
> > review, one proposal will be selected and refined. You can check the
> > timeline to learn about further phases with public reviews before the full
> > proposal for a brand system is presented to the Wikimedia Foundation
> > leadership and the Board.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/RfC_Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia
> >
> > [2]
> >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia#Report_about_this_RfC_by_the_Brand_Project_team
> >
> > [3]
> >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
> >
> > [4]
> >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/FAQ
> >
> > [5]
> >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> >
> > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> >
> > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 1:12 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes. Who's the person telling Samir to post this stuff, which comes
> > > across as aggressively ignoring all feedback to date? Could we have a
> > > word with them here?
> > >
> > >
> > > - d.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 14:12, Peter Southwood
> > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When you speak for someone who is hard of listening, it is an
> > > occupational hazard that you will be shouted at occasionally by those
> > whose
> > > voices are being ignored. It is not necessarily anything personal, just
> > > part of the heat in the kitchen.
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Yaroslav Blanter
> > > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 11:28 AM
> > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
> > > >
> > > > In all honesty, this should not have been directed at Samir. I do not
> > > think
> > > > he has the authority to stop the process. And whoever has probably
> > spends
> > > > more time in Twitter that in Wikimedia projects.
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > Yaroslav
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:12 AM Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > There is something called [[WP:IDHT,]] i.e. I didn't hear that.
> > > > > No matter how many times, how many people (90% in the RFC) speak, I
> > > just
> > > > > didn't hear that.
> > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > (Comment in personal capacity)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 00:15, Samir Elsharbaty <
> > > selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We wanted to follow up with a brief update on the project timeline
> > > and
> > > > > > share an invitation to join an event this month.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We know there continues to be so much uncertainty in the world, so
> > > we are
> > > > > > slowing down the process of the project. Big changes are happening
> > > to all
> > > > > > of us these days. We want to make sure that we respect the time and
> > > > > > priorities of the project collaborators. This means updating the
> > > project
> > > > > > timeline approach to have more flexibility for participants and
> > > smaller
> > > > > > time commitments [1], revising the project schedule month by month
> > > and
> > > > > > keeping the Brand Network [2] and other participants informed on a
> > > more
> > > > > > regular basis with any updates and changes. The naming discussions
> > > > > planned
> > > > > > for April are now pushed to May, at the earliest. Design proposals
> > > are
> > > > > > likewise shifted +4 weeks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But we do have things to share:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *This month: live brand concept presentation!*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To honor, celebrate, and conclude the work around the concepts
> > > referred
> > > > > to
> > > > > > in Essie’s email above [3], Snohetta and the Brand Project team
> > will
> > > > > > present the Unified Concept LIVE on 16 April, 15:00 - 16:00 GMT.
> > > Snøhetta
> > > > > > will explain how they used the ideas, feedback and conceptual
> > models
> > > from
> > > > > > the workshops and online exercises to arrive at a final, unified
> > > concept.
> > > > > > This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming work
> > > around
> > > > > > the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall design
> > > system.
> > > > > > The session will also be recorded and made available for viewing
> > > after.
> > > > > You
> > > > > > can join us using these links. [4] Note: this is not a presentation
> > > of a
> > > > > > proposal for a naming convention or design.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Samir and the brand project team
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brand_Network
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [3] https://brandingwikipedia.org/concepts/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [4] Join via Zoom:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://wikimedia.zoom.us/j/769565325
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Steam via Youtube Live:
> > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:32 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and this is
> > > even
> > > > > > > after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)
> > > > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_%28company%29>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - d.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
> > > > > > > <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the
> > > concerns
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and have
> > now
> > > > > added
> > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details about
> > > the
> > > > > > block
> > > > > > > > and what is being done. The project team is in the process of
> > > > > updating
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add those
> > > pages
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest information.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Samir
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <gnangarra@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial
> > > > > relationship
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community ban
> > > thats
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many
> > users
> > > who
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > blocked and help them become productive contributors but
> > before
> > > > > they
> > > > > > > start
> > > > > > > > > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there
> > > needs to
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > something done to get them back to good standing with the
> > > community
> > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to
> > > rebuild
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > hen
> > > > > > > > > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they
> > > > > recommend.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been pumped
> > > into
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > 2030
> > > > > > > > > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is that
> > > should
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its
> > > > > > comprehensible
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > to have known or explored that before deciding where, how,
> > why
> > > we
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <
> > dgerard@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions an
> > > > > > > unwillingness
> > > > > > > > > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > - d.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > > > > > > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I have
> > > seen so
> > > > > > > far, it
> > > > > > > > > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their homework on
> > > how we
> > > > > > > > > operate,
> > > > > > > > > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care, and
> > > plan
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > spin
> > > > > > > > > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages with
> > > lots
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > buzz,
> > > > > > > > > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid. Maybe
> > > I am
> > > > > > > wrong,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from the
> > > outside?
> > > > > > > Block
> > > > > > > > > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of the
> > > > > > community.
> > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:
> > > > > > wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> > > > > > > On
> > > > > > > > > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a
> > > > > > movement?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't directed
> > > > > > personally
> > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > > > you, Essie.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta
> > > deserved
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good steward
> > > of
> > > > > > > resources
> > > > > > > > > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that this
> > > > > project
> > > > > > > is a
> > > > > > > > > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important
> > component
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF
> > > rebranding
> > > > > > > itself as
> > > > > > > > > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the
> > > communities
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures, governance
> > > > > problems,
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I
> > don't
> > > > > think
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't
> > involve
> > > > > > Snøhetta
> > > > > > > > > > > given its apparent block evasion on English Wikipedia,
> > and
> > > I've
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process during
> > the
> > > past
> > > > > > few
> > > > > > > > > > > months.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not with
> > > this
> > > > > > > program
> > > > > > > > > > > in its current form.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and
> > spending
> > > > > > > associated
> > > > > > > > > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's view
> > > on
> > > > > > > whether
> > > > > > > > > > > this project should continue. If the community wants a
> > > branding
> > > > > > > > > > > project to continue, I would let the community decide on
> > > the
> > > > > > > project's
> > > > > > > > > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant should
> > be
> > > > > > > involved.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Pine
> > > > > > > > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > and
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > and
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > and
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > GN.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > > > > > > > > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > > > > > > > > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > > > > > > > > August
> > > > > > > > > hosted by ESEAP
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Wikimania:
> > https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > > > > > > > > Noongarpedia:
> > > > > https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > > > > > > > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
It would be good to reflect the new changes/progress in the FAQ. 1.1–1.6,
maybe revisited perhaps.

An email above notifies about "slowing down the process", the /Timeline
page also mentions a possible delay because of the crisis. FAQ 1.5 timeline
has not been edited or contains such details (a link to the main timeline
page might be a good idea).

"Exploring new options" seem to be an important point in the last update.
In the FAQ it is mentioned once at FAQ 2.4 while answering "Why is this
project moving forward after the RfC?" However, this might be a separate
FAQ point.

FAQ 2.6: "... findings of the 2030 research and planning community review
[link to email],...."
-- Perhaps a "link to email" is missing? If it so, it's a minor thing of
course and can be fixed.

Regards, in a personal capacity

Thanks
Tito Dutta
Note: If I don't reply to your email in 2 days, please feel free to remind
me over email or phone call.


On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 at 23:22, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think at this point, someone needs to answer: who has predetermined
> this outcome?
>
> It's clear nobody at (say) Samir's level can or will answer this
> question - just repeat the same things again, as if nobody ever
> objected.
>
> So precisely who is so gung-ho for this idea?
>
>
> - d.
>
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 13:58, Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > My comments are in a personal capacity, and kindly note my posts are not
> > directed towards anyone specifically/at all. Sincere thanks for
> > understanding these two points.
> >
> > " We recommend you to have a look at these updates before making further
> > conclusions here.
> > -- Thanks for the recommendation. Kindly do not assume that we are not
> > reading the updates "before making further conclusions here".
> >
> > " the Brand team has been watching the RfC and has written a summary
> about
> > it"
> > --Yes, RfC needs a closure/summary, from which we get action points. Now,
> > there is something called WP:INVOLVED. Someone who is
> > supporting/opposing/promoting/demoting an idea or in other words someone
> > who is "involved" often may not close or summarise a debate/discussion
> with
> > due weight to all the arguments. As a result, conclusions may be faulty,
> > and action points may not reflect the actual opinion of the RfC. Example
> > below.
> >
> > FAQ: Why is this project moving forward after the RfC resulted in clear
> > majority opposition?
> > (
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/FAQ#Why_is_this_project_moving_forward_after_the_RfC_resulted_in_clear_majority_opposition
> > ?)
> > -- Even after reading the answer I also don't understand "why?" A point I
> > get there is "exploring further options". On the report page, "What is
> > happening with the feedback?" (intended action points section perhaps) is
> > taking me to FAQ page. From the FAQ page the last paragraph sends me back
> > to the report page, making it a loop.
> >
> > " The team has integrated the feedback of the RfC in the development
> > process, just as we did with the activities organized by the project
> > itself. "
> > -- unlike other statements here any footnote or reference is not given.
> > Would love to learn what are those activities and how was the RfC
> feedback
> > integrated into the agenda/activity. (Please note that I have read the
> > brand workshop report.)
> >
> > That's all for now, with regards, and good wishes during the global
> > pandemic time,
> > User:Titodutta
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 14:19, Samir Elsharbaty <
> selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, the Brand team has been watching the RfC and has written a summary
> > > about it [1] that was shared both in the RfC [2] and the project page
> [3]
> > > in Meta. The team has integrated the feedback of the RfC in the
> development
> > > process, just as we did with the activities organized by the project
> > > itself.
> > >
> > > The RfC is covered in the main project page as well as in the FAQ [4].
> The
> > > RfC has been a recurrent topic of discussion in the Brand project talk
> page
> > > [5], where we are answering questions and discussing topics whenever
> they
> > > are posted. We recommend you to have a look at these updates before
> making
> > > further conclusions here.
> > >
> > > The RfC is about the use of the word “Wikipedia” in the name of the
> > > Foundation, and by extension the names of affiliates were discussed as
> > > well. The project team has clarified that many options for a naming
> > > convention are being explored. While having Wikipedia as a central
> concept
> > > is a project requirement, It is very unlikely that any naming
> convention
> > > proposal will be based on a simple substitution of the word "Wikimedia"
> > > with the word "Wikipedia". Brand systems offer many more possibilities.
> > >
> > > Another important point to clarify is that the proposals for naming
> > > conventions haven’t been defined yet. According to the project timeline
> > > [6], several proposals for a naming convention will be shared with the
> > > communities for feedback in May, at the earliest. At the end of this
> > > review, one proposal will be selected and refined. You can check the
> > > timeline to learn about further phases with public reviews before the
> full
> > > proposal for a brand system is presented to the Wikimedia Foundation
> > > leadership and the Board.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/RfC_Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia
> > >
> > > [2]
> > >
> > >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia#Report_about_this_RfC_by_the_Brand_Project_team
> > >
> > > [3]
> > >
> > >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
> > >
> > > [4]
> > >
> > >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/FAQ
> > >
> > > [5]
> > >
> > >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > >
> > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > >
> > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 1:12 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes. Who's the person telling Samir to post this stuff, which comes
> > > > across as aggressively ignoring all feedback to date? Could we have a
> > > > word with them here?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - d.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 14:12, Peter Southwood
> > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > When you speak for someone who is hard of listening, it is an
> > > > occupational hazard that you will be shouted at occasionally by those
> > > whose
> > > > voices are being ignored. It is not necessarily anything personal,
> just
> > > > part of the heat in the kitchen.
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Peter
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> On
> > > > Behalf Of Yaroslav Blanter
> > > > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 11:28 AM
> > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
> > > > >
> > > > > In all honesty, this should not have been directed at Samir. I do
> not
> > > > think
> > > > > he has the authority to stop the process. And whoever has probably
> > > spends
> > > > > more time in Twitter that in Wikimedia projects.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best
> > > > > Yaroslav
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:12 AM Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > There is something called [[WP:IDHT,]] i.e. I didn't hear that.
> > > > > > No matter how many times, how many people (90% in the RFC)
> speak, I
> > > > just
> > > > > > didn't hear that.
> > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > (Comment in personal capacity)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 00:15, Samir Elsharbaty <
> > > > selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We wanted to follow up with a brief update on the project
> timeline
> > > > and
> > > > > > > share an invitation to join an event this month.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We know there continues to be so much uncertainty in the
> world, so
> > > > we are
> > > > > > > slowing down the process of the project. Big changes are
> happening
> > > > to all
> > > > > > > of us these days. We want to make sure that we respect the
> time and
> > > > > > > priorities of the project collaborators. This means updating
> the
> > > > project
> > > > > > > timeline approach to have more flexibility for participants and
> > > > smaller
> > > > > > > time commitments [1], revising the project schedule month by
> month
> > > > and
> > > > > > > keeping the Brand Network [2] and other participants informed
> on a
> > > > more
> > > > > > > regular basis with any updates and changes. The naming
> discussions
> > > > > > planned
> > > > > > > for April are now pushed to May, at the earliest. Design
> proposals
> > > > are
> > > > > > > likewise shifted +4 weeks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But we do have things to share:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *This month: live brand concept presentation!*
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To honor, celebrate, and conclude the work around the concepts
> > > > referred
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > in Essie’s email above [3], Snohetta and the Brand Project team
> > > will
> > > > > > > present the Unified Concept LIVE on 16 April, 15:00 - 16:00
> GMT.
> > > > Snøhetta
> > > > > > > will explain how they used the ideas, feedback and conceptual
> > > models
> > > > from
> > > > > > > the workshops and online exercises to arrive at a final,
> unified
> > > > concept.
> > > > > > > This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming
> work
> > > > around
> > > > > > > the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall
> design
> > > > system.
> > > > > > > The session will also be recorded and made available for
> viewing
> > > > after.
> > > > > > You
> > > > > > > can join us using these links. [4] Note: this is not a
> presentation
> > > > of a
> > > > > > > proposal for a naming convention or design.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Samir and the brand project team
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brand_Network
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [3] https://brandingwikipedia.org/concepts/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [4] Join via Zoom:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://wikimedia.zoom.us/j/769565325
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Steam via Youtube Live:
> > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:32 AM David Gerard <
> dgerard@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and
> this is
> > > > even
> > > > > > > > after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)
> > > > > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_%28company%29>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - d.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
> > > > > > > > <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the
> > > > concerns
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and
> have
> > > now
> > > > > > added
> > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details
> about
> > > > the
> > > > > > > block
> > > > > > > > > and what is being done. The project team is in the process
> of
> > > > > > updating
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add
> those
> > > > pages
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest
> information.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Samir
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <
> gnangarra@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial
> > > > > > relationship
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community
> ban
> > > > thats
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many
> > > users
> > > > who
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > blocked and help them become productive contributors but
> > > before
> > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > start
> > > > > > > > > > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there
> > > > needs to
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > something done to get them back to good standing with the
> > > > community
> > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to
> > > > rebuild
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > hen
> > > > > > > > > > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they
> > > > > > recommend.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been
> pumped
> > > > into
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > 2030
> > > > > > > > > > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is
> that
> > > > should
> > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its
> > > > > > > comprehensible
> > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > to have known or explored that before deciding where,
> how,
> > > why
> > > > we
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <
> > > dgerard@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions
> an
> > > > > > > > unwillingness
> > > > > > > > > > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > - d.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > > > > > > > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I
> have
> > > > seen so
> > > > > > > > far, it
> > > > > > > > > > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their
> homework on
> > > > how we
> > > > > > > > > > operate,
> > > > > > > > > > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care,
> and
> > > > plan
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > spin
> > > > > > > > > > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages
> with
> > > > lots
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > buzz,
> > > > > > > > > > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid.
> Maybe
> > > > I am
> > > > > > > > wrong,
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from
> the
> > > > outside?
> > > > > > > > Block
> > > > > > > > > > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of
> the
> > > > > > > community.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:
> > > > > > > wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> > > > > > > > On
> > > > > > > > > > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we
> as a
> > > > > > > movement?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't
> directed
> > > > > > > personally
> > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > > > > you, Essie.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta
> > > > deserved
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good
> steward
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > resources
> > > > > > > > > > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that
> this
> > > > > > project
> > > > > > > > is a
> > > > > > > > > > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important
> > > component
> > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF
> > > > rebranding
> > > > > > > > itself as
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the
> > > > communities
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures,
> governance
> > > > > > problems,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I
> > > don't
> > > > > > think
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't
> > > involve
> > > > > > > Snøhetta
> > > > > > > > > > > > given its apparent block evasion on English
> Wikipedia,
> > > and
> > > > I've
> > > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process
> during
> > > the
> > > > past
> > > > > > > few
> > > > > > > > > > > > months.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not
> with
> > > > this
> > > > > > > > program
> > > > > > > > > > > > in its current form.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and
> > > spending
> > > > > > > > associated
> > > > > > > > > > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's
> view
> > > > on
> > > > > > > > whether
> > > > > > > > > > > > this project should continue. If the community wants
> a
> > > > branding
> > > > > > > > > > > > project to continue, I would let the community
> decide on
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > project's
> > > > > > > > > > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant
> should
> > > be
> > > > > > > > involved.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Pine
> > > > > > > > > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > GN.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > > > > > > > > > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > > > > > > > > > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > > > > > > > > > August
> > > > > > > > > > hosted by ESEAP
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Wikimania:
> > > https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > > > > > > > > > Noongarpedia:
> > > > > > https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > > > > > > > > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> and
> > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Minutes/2018-11-9,10,11#Branding

So this has been dictated from above - the "community consultation" is
window dressing for a decision that's long been made.

Hence the nonsensical claims of massive community support by fiddling
the numbers, employing literal wiki spammers to do the consulting,
etc.

Samir's posts here are an attempt at managing messaging. Nothing a
community member does to "engage" with this process will change the
path that's been set.

Image Filter 2.0 anyone?


- d.

On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 at 21:38, Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It would be good to reflect the new changes/progress in the FAQ. 1.1–1.6,
> maybe revisited perhaps.
>
> An email above notifies about "slowing down the process", the /Timeline
> page also mentions a possible delay because of the crisis. FAQ 1.5 timeline
> has not been edited or contains such details (a link to the main timeline
> page might be a good idea).
>
> "Exploring new options" seem to be an important point in the last update.
> In the FAQ it is mentioned once at FAQ 2.4 while answering "Why is this
> project moving forward after the RfC?" However, this might be a separate
> FAQ point.
>
> FAQ 2.6: "... findings of the 2030 research and planning community review
> [link to email],...."
> -- Perhaps a "link to email" is missing? If it so, it's a minor thing of
> course and can be fixed.
>
> Regards, in a personal capacity
>
> Thanks
> Tito Dutta
> Note: If I don't reply to your email in 2 days, please feel free to remind
> me over email or phone call.
>
>
> On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 at 23:22, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think at this point, someone needs to answer: who has predetermined
> > this outcome?
> >
> > It's clear nobody at (say) Samir's level can or will answer this
> > question - just repeat the same things again, as if nobody ever
> > objected.
> >
> > So precisely who is so gung-ho for this idea?
> >
> >
> > - d.
> >
> > On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 13:58, Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > My comments are in a personal capacity, and kindly note my posts are not
> > > directed towards anyone specifically/at all. Sincere thanks for
> > > understanding these two points.
> > >
> > > " We recommend you to have a look at these updates before making further
> > > conclusions here.
> > > -- Thanks for the recommendation. Kindly do not assume that we are not
> > > reading the updates "before making further conclusions here".
> > >
> > > " the Brand team has been watching the RfC and has written a summary
> > about
> > > it"
> > > --Yes, RfC needs a closure/summary, from which we get action points. Now,
> > > there is something called WP:INVOLVED. Someone who is
> > > supporting/opposing/promoting/demoting an idea or in other words someone
> > > who is "involved" often may not close or summarise a debate/discussion
> > with
> > > due weight to all the arguments. As a result, conclusions may be faulty,
> > > and action points may not reflect the actual opinion of the RfC. Example
> > > below.
> > >
> > > FAQ: Why is this project moving forward after the RfC resulted in clear
> > > majority opposition?
> > > (
> > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/FAQ#Why_is_this_project_moving_forward_after_the_RfC_resulted_in_clear_majority_opposition
> > > ?)
> > > -- Even after reading the answer I also don't understand "why?" A point I
> > > get there is "exploring further options". On the report page, "What is
> > > happening with the feedback?" (intended action points section perhaps) is
> > > taking me to FAQ page. From the FAQ page the last paragraph sends me back
> > > to the report page, making it a loop.
> > >
> > > " The team has integrated the feedback of the RfC in the development
> > > process, just as we did with the activities organized by the project
> > > itself. "
> > > -- unlike other statements here any footnote or reference is not given.
> > > Would love to learn what are those activities and how was the RfC
> > feedback
> > > integrated into the agenda/activity. (Please note that I have read the
> > > brand workshop report.)
> > >
> > > That's all for now, with regards, and good wishes during the global
> > > pandemic time,
> > > User:Titodutta
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 14:19, Samir Elsharbaty <
> > selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, the Brand team has been watching the RfC and has written a summary
> > > > about it [1] that was shared both in the RfC [2] and the project page
> > [3]
> > > > in Meta. The team has integrated the feedback of the RfC in the
> > development
> > > > process, just as we did with the activities organized by the project
> > > > itself.
> > > >
> > > > The RfC is covered in the main project page as well as in the FAQ [4].
> > The
> > > > RfC has been a recurrent topic of discussion in the Brand project talk
> > page
> > > > [5], where we are answering questions and discussing topics whenever
> > they
> > > > are posted. We recommend you to have a look at these updates before
> > making
> > > > further conclusions here.
> > > >
> > > > The RfC is about the use of the word “Wikipedia” in the name of the
> > > > Foundation, and by extension the names of affiliates were discussed as
> > > > well. The project team has clarified that many options for a naming
> > > > convention are being explored. While having Wikipedia as a central
> > concept
> > > > is a project requirement, It is very unlikely that any naming
> > convention
> > > > proposal will be based on a simple substitution of the word "Wikimedia"
> > > > with the word "Wikipedia". Brand systems offer many more possibilities.
> > > >
> > > > Another important point to clarify is that the proposals for naming
> > > > conventions haven’t been defined yet. According to the project timeline
> > > > [6], several proposals for a naming convention will be shared with the
> > > > communities for feedback in May, at the earliest. At the end of this
> > > > review, one proposal will be selected and refined. You can check the
> > > > timeline to learn about further phases with public reviews before the
> > full
> > > > proposal for a brand system is presented to the Wikimedia Foundation
> > > > leadership and the Board.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/RfC_Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia
> > > >
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia#Report_about_this_RfC_by_the_Brand_Project_team
> > > >
> > > > [3]
> > > >
> > > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
> > > >
> > > > [4]
> > > >
> > > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/FAQ
> > > >
> > > > [5]
> > > >
> > > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > >
> > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > >
> > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 1:12 AM David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes. Who's the person telling Samir to post this stuff, which comes
> > > > > across as aggressively ignoring all feedback to date? Could we have a
> > > > > word with them here?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - d.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 14:12, Peter Southwood
> > > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When you speak for someone who is hard of listening, it is an
> > > > > occupational hazard that you will be shouted at occasionally by those
> > > > whose
> > > > > voices are being ignored. It is not necessarily anything personal,
> > just
> > > > > part of the heat in the kitchen.
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Peter
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> > On
> > > > > Behalf Of Yaroslav Blanter
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 11:28 AM
> > > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In all honesty, this should not have been directed at Samir. I do
> > not
> > > > > think
> > > > > > he has the authority to stop the process. And whoever has probably
> > > > spends
> > > > > > more time in Twitter that in Wikimedia projects.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best
> > > > > > Yaroslav
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:12 AM Tito Dutta <trulytito@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is something called [[WP:IDHT,]] i.e. I didn't hear that.
> > > > > > > No matter how many times, how many people (90% in the RFC)
> > speak, I
> > > > > just
> > > > > > > didn't hear that.
> > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > (Comment in personal capacity)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 00:15, Samir Elsharbaty <
> > > > > selsharbaty@wikimedia.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We wanted to follow up with a brief update on the project
> > timeline
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > share an invitation to join an event this month.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We know there continues to be so much uncertainty in the
> > world, so
> > > > > we are
> > > > > > > > slowing down the process of the project. Big changes are
> > happening
> > > > > to all
> > > > > > > > of us these days. We want to make sure that we respect the
> > time and
> > > > > > > > priorities of the project collaborators. This means updating
> > the
> > > > > project
> > > > > > > > timeline approach to have more flexibility for participants and
> > > > > smaller
> > > > > > > > time commitments [1], revising the project schedule month by
> > month
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > keeping the Brand Network [2] and other participants informed
> > on a
> > > > > more
> > > > > > > > regular basis with any updates and changes. The naming
> > discussions
> > > > > > > planned
> > > > > > > > for April are now pushed to May, at the earliest. Design
> > proposals
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > > likewise shifted +4 weeks.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But we do have things to share:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > *This month: live brand concept presentation!*
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > To honor, celebrate, and conclude the work around the concepts
> > > > > referred
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > in Essie’s email above [3], Snohetta and the Brand Project team
> > > > will
> > > > > > > > present the Unified Concept LIVE on 16 April, 15:00 - 16:00
> > GMT.
> > > > > Snøhetta
> > > > > > > > will explain how they used the ideas, feedback and conceptual
> > > > models
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > > the workshops and online exercises to arrive at a final,
> > unified
> > > > > concept.
> > > > > > > > This unified concept will be the foundation for the upcoming
> > work
> > > > > around
> > > > > > > > the naming conventions, visual decisions, and the overall
> > design
> > > > > system.
> > > > > > > > The session will also be recorded and made available for
> > viewing
> > > > > after.
> > > > > > > You
> > > > > > > > can join us using these links. [4] Note: this is not a
> > presentation
> > > > > of a
> > > > > > > > proposal for a naming convention or design.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Samir and the brand project team
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_movement_brand_project/Timeline
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brand_Network
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [3] https://brandingwikipedia.org/concepts/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [4] Join via Zoom:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://wikimedia.zoom.us/j/769565325
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Steam via Youtube Live:
> > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS72O6Si94Q
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:32 AM David Gerard <
> > dgerard@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The article itself is spammy brochure-style nonsense, and
> > this is
> > > > > even
> > > > > > > > > after some cleanup. Editorial eyes welcomed.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_(company)
> > > > > > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn%C3%B8hetta_%28company%29>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - d.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 23:16, Samir Elsharbaty
> > > > > > > > > <selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The Brand Project Team felt it was important to address the
> > > > > concerns
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > questions around Snøhetta and the English Wikipedia, and
> > have
> > > > now
> > > > > > > added
> > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > FAQ about it. [1] Please refer there for the full details
> > about
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > block
> > > > > > > > > > and what is being done. The project team is in the process
> > of
> > > > > > > updating
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > project materials, including the FAQ, so feel free to add
> > those
> > > > > pages
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > your watchlist to stay up to date on the latest
> > information.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Samir
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [1] https://w.wiki/LEF
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:43 AM Gnangarra <
> > gnangarra@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This does have feeling of a company creating a financial
> > > > > > > relationship
> > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > the Foundation as way to bypass or backdoor a community
> > ban
> > > > > thats
> > > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > > reviewed already. Over the years I've worked with many
> > > > users
> > > > > who
> > > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > > blocked and help them become productive contributors but
> > > > before
> > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > start
> > > > > > > > > > > making recommendation or decisions about who we are there
> > > > > needs to
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > something done to get them back to good standing with the
> > > > > community
> > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > untiil thats taken place. It's like asking the fox to
> > > > > rebuild
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > hen
> > > > > > > > > > > house, I just dont see how I could support anything they
> > > > > > > recommend.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > After the dollars, and t=volunteer time that has been
> > pumped
> > > > > into
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > 2030
> > > > > > > > > > > strategy shouldnt we already know who we are, as it is
> > that
> > > > > should
> > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > been the key starting point for a strategy process. Its
> > > > > > > > comprehensible
> > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > > to have known or explored that before deciding where,
> > how,
> > > > why
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > doing anything for the next 10 years.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 03:20, David Gerard <
> > > > dgerard@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Particularly as they've demonstrated by their actions
> > an
> > > > > > > > > unwillingness
> > > > > > > > > > > > to work with Wikipedia properly:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive318#Review_of_User:Sn%C3%B8hettaAS_block_please
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > - d.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 04:34, Peter Southwood
> > > > > > > > > > > > <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I would agree with this in principle. From what I
> > have
> > > > > seen so
> > > > > > > > > far, it
> > > > > > > > > > > > looks like either Snøhetta have not done their
> > homework on
> > > > > how we
> > > > > > > > > > > operate,
> > > > > > > > > > > > or they have the arrogance of PR agencies, don't care,
> > and
> > > > > plan
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > spin
> > > > > > > > > > > > their way through with smoke and mirrors, flashy pages
> > with
> > > > > lots
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > buzz,
> > > > > > > > > > > > little content and all the dialogue they can't avoid.
> > Maybe
> > > > > I am
> > > > > > > > > wrong,
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > they have just been badly briefed. Who can tell from
> > the
> > > > > outside?
> > > > > > > > > Block
> > > > > > > > > > > > evasion does not bode well for their understanding of
> > the
> > > > > > > > community.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:
> > > > > > > > wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org]
> > > > > > > > > On
> > > > > > > > > > > > Behalf Of Pine W
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:13 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we
> > as a
> > > > > > > > movement?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > First, a disclaimer that these comments aren't
> > directed
> > > > > > > > personally
> > > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > you, Essie.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Even if money was unlimited, I thought that Snøhetta
> > > > > deserved
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > community's trust, and I felt that WMF was a good
> > steward
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > resources
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (all of which are questionable), I don't think that
> > this
> > > > > > > project
> > > > > > > > > is a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > good idea. Wikidata is an increasingly important
> > > > component
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Wikiverse, and there are a some problems with WMF
> > > > > rebranding
> > > > > > > > > itself as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Wikipedia Foundation including the risk to the
> > > > > communities
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > affiliates from WMF's political adventures,
> > governance
> > > > > > > problems,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > occasional high profile clashes with the community. I
> > > > don't
> > > > > > > think
> > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the costs or the risks here make sense, I wouldn't
> > > > involve
> > > > > > > > Snøhetta
> > > > > > > > > > > > > given its apparent block evasion on English
> > Wikipedia,
> > > > and
> > > > > I've
> > > > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > unimpressed with WMF's handling of this process
> > during
> > > > the
> > > > > past
> > > > > > > > few
> > > > > > > > > > > > > months.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I am fine with discussions about branding, but not
> > with
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > program
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in its current form.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Given the choice, I would freeze this project and
> > > > spending
> > > > > > > > > associated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with it pending a Meta RfC regarding the community's
> > view
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > whether
> > > > > > > > > > > > > this project should continue. If the community wants
> > a
> > > > > branding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > project to continue, I would let the community
> > decide on
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > project's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > parameters and budget, and what if any consultant
> > should
> > > > be
> > > > > > > > > involved.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Pine
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > GN.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > *Power of Diverse Collaboration*
> > > > > > > > > > > *Sharing knowledge brings people together*
> > > > > > > > > > > Wikimania Bangkok 2021
> > > > > > > > > > > August
> > > > > > > > > > > hosted by ESEAP
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Wikimania:
> > > > https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > > > > > > > > > > Noongarpedia:
> > > > > > > https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page
> > > > > > > > > > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > and
> > > > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
A LOT of people worldwide are dying and have died today, some are
people we know or love, and this is the important and urgent
"community branding" project that WMF management wants to spend their
employee time and goodwill free volunteer effort on. Really?

It seems fair to repost my statement from a month ago, perhaps by
volunteers in the real "community" just keeping on repeating,
repeating and repeating how this is pointless and damaging, eventually
some of the management team might accidentally read some of the
negative feedback through their "supportive criticism" rose-tinted
jargon bubbles:

"WMF management, stop flushing away the donor's money on this, please.
It has already been overwhelmingly rejected, failed, and not firmly
ending it makes you appear unable to stop paying consultants to make
up more marketing jargon nonsense to justify their invoice." (14 March
2020)

How about you cancel the branding consultancy and direct 100% of that
pile of cash towards the range of Wikimedia Covid-19 projects to
create great factual content to combat commercial lobbying and fake
news, the type of fake news we see promoted by the President of the
United States every day in the global media?

Thanks!
Fae

On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 09:49, Samir Elsharbaty
<selsharbaty@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> Hi, the Brand team has been watching the RfC and has written a summary
> about it [1] that was shared both in the RfC [2] and the project page [3]
> in Meta. The team has integrated the feedback of the RfC in the development
> process, just as we did with the activities organized by the project
> itself.
...

> Samir Elsharbaty (he/him)
> Community Brand and Marketing coordinator
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
David Gerard wrote:
>https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Minutes/2018-11-9,10,11#Branding
>
>So this has been dictated from above - the "community consultation" is
>window dressing for a decision that's long been made.
>
>Hence the nonsensical claims of massive community support by fiddling
>the numbers, employing literal wiki spammers to do the consulting,
>etc.

Wikimedia Foundation Inc. is bad. There are dozens of examples
illustrating why this is true, but this forcible rebranding is a
particularly good demonstration of the rot.

The people most directly responsible here are Katherine Maher and Heather
Walls. They're both subscribed to this mailing list, they both understand
that this decision would upset long-time contributors, and they both
simply decided to ignore any complaints in favor of attempting to siphon
more money from donors and force their "vision" on the broader movement.
You don't see either of them defending themselves or their actions here
for a reason. They didn't both forget how e-mail works or how the wikis
work, they've intentionally chosen to plug their ears and march forward.

What's more offensive, in my opinion, than this forcible rebranding effort
is that they've spent and will continue to spend hundreds of thousands of
dollars on it. It would be bad enough to make this unilateral decision and
implement it with the existing bloated staff, but instead they've hired
agencies and consultants and wasted additional hundreds of thousands of
dollars in donor money on this sham exercise.

But don't worry, highly deceptive advertising is back on the projects, in
mid-April, to ensure continued funding of this and other charades.

MZMcBride



_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
Hmm. As Deskana has pointed out in the past, painting everyone at WMF
with the same brush is problematic. It can demoralize people who do
good work.

At the same time, it's difficult to escape the conclusion that the
same problems occur at WMF year after year. As the saying goes, "The
more things change, the more they stay the same." I think that the WMF
Board is a part of the problem. In the meantime, the best that the
rest of us can do is to continue to make our opinions known and try to
be productive.

I'm reluctant to call for changes of individually identifiable staff
without knowing more about the facts of this situation. I simply don't
have enough information.

I'm not aware of any large organization which doesn't have recurring
problems. WMF is not unique in this regard. That's not an excuse, but
I think that it's also important to be realistic.

Pine
( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
I think it’s important to realise that there *is* a big issue here. How we want to be perceived and how we are actually perceived are *not* the same.

We can argue about WMF vs. community as much as we want, but that won’t change reality.

Please can we focus on how we solve the problem instead of internal bickering? (This applies equally to the community and the brand project.)

Thanks,
Mike

> On 15 Apr 2020, at 20:05, Pine W <wiki.pine@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hmm. As Deskana has pointed out in the past, painting everyone at WMF
> with the same brush is problematic. It can demoralize people who do
> good work.
>
> At the same time, it's difficult to escape the conclusion that the
> same problems occur at WMF year after year. As the saying goes, "The
> more things change, the more they stay the same." I think that the WMF
> Board is a part of the problem. In the meantime, the best that the
> rest of us can do is to continue to make our opinions known and try to
> be productive.
>
> I'm reluctant to call for changes of individually identifiable staff
> without knowing more about the facts of this situation. I simply don't
> have enough information.
>
> I'm not aware of any large organization which doesn't have recurring
> problems. WMF is not unique in this regard. That's not an excuse, but
> I think that it's also important to be realistic.
>
> Pine
> ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
Hoi,
When I read something like this, it takes me aback. Yes, people may have an
opinion, they may even express it and they even may be wrong. Who cares
really. There is enough to dislike in branding, we are not cattle. From a
marketing perspective there may be a point. The point would be to bring all
that we do together, bring it together so that what it is we are and what
is we do better understood by an audience, an audience that we want to
entice to like us enough to become part of our Wikimedia movement.

The problem is that the "long time contributors" don't like change. They
have invested so much in whatever it is they think makes our projects work
that they do not see the forest from the trees. They forget what our
primary aim, is and fail to appreciate that all conventions are there to
support the aim of sharing in the sum of all knowledge. This week Wikipedia
administrators killed off the ListeriaBot because it defied a convention. A
convention that they could not explain to me does harm to our public. A
convention that exists because it was conceded to English Wikipedia that
they could have non free images exclusive to its project. When challenged
that they do not care about Wikipedia's quality, that manually maintained
lists average out to be not as well maintained as Listeria list there was
silence. They did not care because it did not address their need that their
convention had to prevail.

"Long time contributors", administrators are the ones expecting others to
share their sentiment about everything what is bad. I don't. Katherine
Maher brought an end to a period of stagnation. My impression is that at
the Wikimedia Foundation things look up. I love it that the WMF wants to
expand and I totally agree that English Wikipedia, its best known product,
the brand that is known by many is exactly what is not bringing us
together.

I prefer people like Mackenzie Lemieux or Jess Wade any time over the "long
time contributors".. PS with a blog going back 15 years, with 2,606,298
edits I qualify as a long time contributor..

So if your opinions are as good as the reflections you have on the quality
of Wikipedia, I do not care about your opinions. By my calculations there
is on average error rate of 4% in lists because of false friends. Magnus
blogged how manually maintained list are anything but well maintained
lists. The key point of branding in the marketing sense is that it is to
bring out the best of what is on offer.

The basis of what we have on offer is in what we aim to achieve and, for me
our aim is to share in the sum of the knowledge that is available to us.
Everything that is in its way of achieving this needs reflection and imho
there is a lot to reflect.
Thanks,
GerardM

On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 18:59, MZMcBride <z@mzmcbride.com> wrote:

> David Gerard wrote:
> >https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Minutes/2018-11-9,10,11#Branding
> >
> >So this has been dictated from above - the "community consultation" is
> >window dressing for a decision that's long been made.
> >
> >Hence the nonsensical claims of massive community support by fiddling
> >the numbers, employing literal wiki spammers to do the consulting,
> >etc.
>
> Wikimedia Foundation Inc. is bad. There are dozens of examples
> illustrating why this is true, but this forcible rebranding is a
> particularly good demonstration of the rot.
>
> The people most directly responsible here are Katherine Maher and Heather
> Walls. They're both subscribed to this mailing list, they both understand
> that this decision would upset long-time contributors, and they both
> simply decided to ignore any complaints in favor of attempting to siphon
> more money from donors and force their "vision" on the broader movement.
> You don't see either of them defending themselves or their actions here
> for a reason. They didn't both forget how e-mail works or how the wikis
> work, they've intentionally chosen to plug their ears and march forward.
>
> What's more offensive, in my opinion, than this forcible rebranding effort
> is that they've spent and will continue to spend hundreds of thousands of
> dollars on it. It would be bad enough to make this unilateral decision and
> implement it with the existing bloated staff, but instead they've hired
> agencies and consultants and wasted additional hundreds of thousands of
> dollars in donor money on this sham exercise.
>
> But don't worry, highly deceptive advertising is back on the projects, in
> mid-April, to ensure continued funding of this and other charades.
>
> MZMcBride
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Brand Project: Who are we as a movement? [ In reply to ]
There certainly is a lot to reflect on, isn't there?

Maybe you can do some reflecting on the fact that those "long-time
contributors" were, in many cases, working on Wikipedia before most people
had ever even heard of it (when I first started working on it, "What's
Wikipedia?" would be a question I was often asked if I'd mention it;
haven't heard that for a while though), and have been working to build,
maintain, and improve it ever since. So maybe there's a reason we care a
great deal about it.

And maybe there's a good reason to listen to the people who literally built
the thing, made it into what it is, and still day to day keep it going.
Maybe we know what we're doing. I think we rather proved it.

Todd

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:00 PM Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hoi,
> When I read something like this, it takes me aback. Yes, people may have an
> opinion, they may even express it and they even may be wrong. Who cares
> really. There is enough to dislike in branding, we are not cattle. From a
> marketing perspective there may be a point. The point would be to bring all
> that we do together, bring it together so that what it is we are and what
> is we do better understood by an audience, an audience that we want to
> entice to like us enough to become part of our Wikimedia movement.
>
> The problem is that the "long time contributors" don't like change. They
> have invested so much in whatever it is they think makes our projects work
> that they do not see the forest from the trees. They forget what our
> primary aim, is and fail to appreciate that all conventions are there to
> support the aim of sharing in the sum of all knowledge. This week Wikipedia
> administrators killed off the ListeriaBot because it defied a convention. A
> convention that they could not explain to me does harm to our public. A
> convention that exists because it was conceded to English Wikipedia that
> they could have non free images exclusive to its project. When challenged
> that they do not care about Wikipedia's quality, that manually maintained
> lists average out to be not as well maintained as Listeria list there was
> silence. They did not care because it did not address their need that their
> convention had to prevail.
>
> "Long time contributors", administrators are the ones expecting others to
> share their sentiment about everything what is bad. I don't. Katherine
> Maher brought an end to a period of stagnation. My impression is that at
> the Wikimedia Foundation things look up. I love it that the WMF wants to
> expand and I totally agree that English Wikipedia, its best known product,
> the brand that is known by many is exactly what is not bringing us
> together.
>
> I prefer people like Mackenzie Lemieux or Jess Wade any time over the "long
> time contributors".. PS with a blog going back 15 years, with 2,606,298
> edits I qualify as a long time contributor..
>
> So if your opinions are as good as the reflections you have on the quality
> of Wikipedia, I do not care about your opinions. By my calculations there
> is on average error rate of 4% in lists because of false friends. Magnus
> blogged how manually maintained list are anything but well maintained
> lists. The key point of branding in the marketing sense is that it is to
> bring out the best of what is on offer.
>
> The basis of what we have on offer is in what we aim to achieve and, for me
> our aim is to share in the sum of the knowledge that is available to us.
> Everything that is in its way of achieving this needs reflection and imho
> there is a lot to reflect.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 18:59, MZMcBride <z@mzmcbride.com> wrote:
>
> > David Gerard wrote:
> > >https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Minutes/2018-11-9,10,11#Branding
> > >
> > >So this has been dictated from above - the "community consultation" is
> > >window dressing for a decision that's long been made.
> > >
> > >Hence the nonsensical claims of massive community support by fiddling
> > >the numbers, employing literal wiki spammers to do the consulting,
> > >etc.
> >
> > Wikimedia Foundation Inc. is bad. There are dozens of examples
> > illustrating why this is true, but this forcible rebranding is a
> > particularly good demonstration of the rot.
> >
> > The people most directly responsible here are Katherine Maher and Heather
> > Walls. They're both subscribed to this mailing list, they both understand
> > that this decision would upset long-time contributors, and they both
> > simply decided to ignore any complaints in favor of attempting to siphon
> > more money from donors and force their "vision" on the broader movement.
> > You don't see either of them defending themselves or their actions here
> > for a reason. They didn't both forget how e-mail works or how the wikis
> > work, they've intentionally chosen to plug their ears and march forward.
> >
> > What's more offensive, in my opinion, than this forcible rebranding
> effort
> > is that they've spent and will continue to spend hundreds of thousands of
> > dollars on it. It would be bad enough to make this unilateral decision
> and
> > implement it with the existing bloated staff, but instead they've hired
> > agencies and consultants and wasted additional hundreds of thousands of
> > dollars in donor money on this sham exercise.
> >
> > But don't worry, highly deceptive advertising is back on the projects, in
> > mid-April, to ensure continued funding of this and other charades.
> >
> > MZMcBride
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

1 2 3  View All