Mailing List Archive

Trademark violation
Is this a trademark violation? http://www.wikipediaclassaction.org/
RE: Trademark violation [ In reply to ]
This situation is being addressed on Juriwiki-L for legal reasons.
Thank you for bringing it to the list's attention.

-Brad

Bradford A. Patrick, Esq.
Fowler White Boggs Banker
501 E. Kennedy Blvd.
Suite 1700
Tampa, FL 33602-5239
(813) 228-7411 main
(813) 222-3336 direct
(813) 229-8313 fax
bpatrick@fowlerwhite.com




-----Original Message-----
From: foundation-l-bounces@wikimedia.org
[mailto:foundation-l-bounces@wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Dori
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 6:43 PM
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Subject: [Foundation-l] Trademark violation

Is this a trademark violation? http://www.wikipediaclassaction.org/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer under IRS Circular 230: Unless expressly stated otherwise in this transmission, nothing contained in this message is intended or written to be used, nor may it be relied upon or used, (1) by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and/or (2) by any person to support the promotion or marketing of or to recommend any Federal tax transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed in this message.

If you desire a formal opinion on a particular tax matter for the purpose of avoiding the imposition of any penalties, we will discuss the additional Treasury requirements that must be met and whether it is possible to meet those requirements under the circumstances, as well as the anticipated time and additional fees involved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidentiality Disclaimer: This e-mail message and any attachments are private communication sent by a law firm, Fowler White Boggs Banker P.A., and may contain confidential, legally privileged information meant solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, then delete the e-mail and any attachments from your system. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Re: Trademark violation [ In reply to ]
Dori wrote:

>Is this a trademark violation? http://www.wikipediaclassaction.org/
>
>
I doubt it. He is not pretending to be Wikipedia, and I suppose his
usage is relevant to what he is trying to do. None of the ads for other
class actions use the logo. As long as he limits himself to that narrow
use it may be better to follow a policy of "Don't feed the trolls."

Ec

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Re: Trademark violation [ In reply to ]
On 12/12/05, Ray Saintonge <saintonge@telus.net> wrote:
> Dori wrote:
>
> >Is this a trademark violation? http://www.wikipediaclassaction.org/
> >
> >
> I doubt it. He is not pretending to be Wikipedia, and I suppose his
> usage is relevant to what he is trying to do. None of the ads for other
> class actions use the logo. As long as he limits himself to that narrow
> use it may be better to follow a policy of "Don't feed the trolls."
>
> Ec

I won't post anymore here since people are discussing it at juriwiki,
but the site does say "(c) 2005 WikipediaClassAction.org — All rights
reserved." and they mention nothing about Wikipedia being a redistered
mark of another entity. At the very least having the image there is a
copyright violation. Anyway I'm not a lawyer so I'll shut up.

Dori
Re: Trademark violation [ In reply to ]
Dori wrote:

>On 12/12/05, Ray Saintonge <saintonge@telus.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Dori wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Is this a trademark violation? http://www.wikipediaclassaction.org/
>>>
>>>
>>I doubt it. He is not pretending to be Wikipedia, and I suppose his
>>usage is relevant to what he is trying to do. None of the ads for other
>>class actions use the logo. As long as he limits himself to that narrow
>>use it may be better to follow a policy of "Don't feed the trolls."
>>
>>Ec
>>
>>
>I won't post anymore here since people are discussing it at juriwiki,
>but the site does say "(c) 2005 WikipediaClassAction.org — All rights
>reserved." and they mention nothing about Wikipedia being a redistered
>mark of another entity. At the very least having the image there is a
>copyright violation. Anyway I'm not a lawyer so I'll shut up.
>
He would probably have a fair use claim.

Copyright notice is not an essential element to owning a copyright, so
any such notice is in itself meaningless. Furthermore, a domain name is
not a person, and has no legal standing of its own; it can't own anything.

Ec

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Re: Trademark violation [ In reply to ]
On 12/12/05 5:43 PM, "Dori" <slowpoke@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is this a trademark violation? http://www.wikipediaclassaction.org/

> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


I love how "fair use" goes out the window when stuff concerning the
Foundation itself is concerned.

--Guy


_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l