Nathan wrote:
> The biggest problem for Wikinews in my mind is that delivering news is a
> competitive and innovative business. In the on-line and comprehensive
> encyclopedia vacuum, Wikipedia was able to be "get there first, with the
> most" and draw eyeballs and participants by being the leader.
This certainly distinguishes Wikipedia from all the sister projects.
Wikipedia started with a vision; the sister projects started by not
being Wikipedia. Each, beginning with Meta, was set up to get around a
limitation imposed by a Wikpedia rule. It's very difficult to build
vision when your entire raison d'être depends on *not* being something.
Ec
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> The biggest problem for Wikinews in my mind is that delivering news is a
> competitive and innovative business. In the on-line and comprehensive
> encyclopedia vacuum, Wikipedia was able to be "get there first, with the
> most" and draw eyeballs and participants by being the leader.
This certainly distinguishes Wikipedia from all the sister projects.
Wikipedia started with a vision; the sister projects started by not
being Wikipedia. Each, beginning with Meta, was set up to get around a
limitation imposed by a Wikpedia rule. It's very difficult to build
vision when your entire raison d'être depends on *not* being something.
Ec
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l