Mailing List Archive: SRS & Postfix

SRS & Postfix

Apr 11, 2004, 12:41 PM

Post #1 of 3 (3211 views)

I sent the following to Meng Wong, who suggested that I post it here,
for public discussion. I'm brand-new to SPF/SRS, having just published
my SPF records, and implimenting SPF record checking (via postfix's
policy daemon), yesterday.

On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 09:48:03PM -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
| Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
|
| >I have added SPF records to my domain. I'm about to impliment SPF
| >checking, via Postfix's policy daemon and your spf.pl script.
| >
| >Some of my users do not receive their mail on my server, but have a
| >permanent alias that forwards their mail to where they wish to read it.
| >According to what I have read, this requires that I impliment SRS on my
| >server.
| >
| >How do I do that with Postfix as my MTA?
|
| I should mention that I would have asked this on the Postfix list, but
| on March 30th, Wietse declared discussion of SPF/SRS to be done, and
| that anyone who brought it up would be unsubscribed. So, if I'm to do
| this, it will have to be without his assistance. :-/
|
| -ste
|

Re: SRS & Postfix [ In reply to ]

mengwong at dumbo

Apr 11, 2004, 2:39 PM

Post #2 of 3 (3068 views)

Permalink

On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 03:41:32PM -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
| |
| | I should mention that I would have asked this on the Postfix list, but
| | on March 30th, Wietse declared discussion of SPF/SRS to be done, and
| | that anyone who brought it up would be unsubscribed. So, if I'm to do
| | this, it will have to be without his assistance. :-/
| |

on the bright side he did say he would include the SPF plugin in the
distribution :) I'll need to send him a new version soon.

Re: SRS & Postfix [ In reply to ]

ste at smxy

Apr 11, 2004, 2:52 PM

Post #3 of 3 (3070 views)

Permalink

Meng Weng Wong wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 03:41:32PM -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> | |
> | | I should mention that I would have asked this on the Postfix list, but
> | | on March 30th, Wietse declared discussion of SPF/SRS to be done, and
> | | that anyone who brought it up would be unsubscribed. So, if I'm to do
> | | this, it will have to be without his assistance. :-/
> | |
>
> on the bright side he did say he would include the SPF plugin in the
> distribution :) I'll need to send him a new version soon.

Yes, it's one rev back from the version on your site (which I used).

But back to my main concern - has anyone developed a patch to postfix to
allow it to do SRS?

-ste