Scott Kitterman wrote (six weeks ago on the SPF Council list):
>> I did this kind of arithmetic before moving a "4 out of 5"
>> erratum to confirmed. And I'm still waiting for the critical
>> 3rd vote on two other issues, Authentication-Results and the
>> "IETF other lists".
> I'm starting to see the wisdom of IETF other. Can we register
> ourselves as IETF other right now and then point the auth
> results people at spf-discuss as another place they need to
> visit?
Hi, sorry for the later answer, I was busy with other things
(12-19), and later I somehow managed to lose the "unanswered"
flag.
I don't think that adding SPF discuss to "other lists" or not
interests Murray, and if he gets around to update his draft
I think that the "rfc822" list might be better to discuss it.
It's certainly for *other* drafts remotely related to SPF, as
far as they are discussed here.
I take your opinion as undisputed "third vote" (IIRC you are
also one of the moderators here). Nobody here had questions
about the answers I got on the IPR WG list from two former
IETF Chairs among others => good enough.
Frank
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=1311532&id_secret=91608632-16b2c0
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>> I did this kind of arithmetic before moving a "4 out of 5"
>> erratum to confirmed. And I'm still waiting for the critical
>> 3rd vote on two other issues, Authentication-Results and the
>> "IETF other lists".
> I'm starting to see the wisdom of IETF other. Can we register
> ourselves as IETF other right now and then point the auth
> results people at spf-discuss as another place they need to
> visit?
Hi, sorry for the later answer, I was busy with other things
(12-19), and later I somehow managed to lose the "unanswered"
flag.
I don't think that adding SPF discuss to "other lists" or not
interests Murray, and if he gets around to update his draft
I think that the "rfc822" list might be better to discuss it.
It's certainly for *other* drafts remotely related to SPF, as
far as they are discussed here.
I take your opinion as undisputed "third vote" (IIRC you are
also one of the moderators here). Nobody here had questions
about the answers I got on the IPR WG list from two former
IETF Chairs among others => good enough.
Frank
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=1311532&id_secret=91608632-16b2c0
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com