Hi,
in RFC 4408 I read
The community is invited to observe the success or failure of the two
approaches during the two years following publication, in order that
a community consensus can be reached in the future.
Since the publication is apparently April 2006, the above implies there
is a deadline for April 2008. Is that correct? Should we provide a new
RFC by that date?
The most obvious amendment is, of course, that the protocol comes out
of its experimental status :-/
(I'd like to suggest another couple of amendments, for the FAIL and
SOFTFAIL behavior, which I'll post with their own subjects soon.)
Happy new 2008!
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=1311532&id_secret=82132647-b36780
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
in RFC 4408 I read
The community is invited to observe the success or failure of the two
approaches during the two years following publication, in order that
a community consensus can be reached in the future.
Since the publication is apparently April 2006, the above implies there
is a deadline for April 2008. Is that correct? Should we provide a new
RFC by that date?
The most obvious amendment is, of course, that the protocol comes out
of its experimental status :-/
(I'd like to suggest another couple of amendments, for the FAIL and
SOFTFAIL behavior, which I'll post with their own subjects soon.)
Happy new 2008!
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=1311532&id_secret=82132647-b36780
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com