On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 06:18:41PM -0500, wayne wrote:
|
| A new version of the alternate C implementation of SPF (libspf-alt) is
| now available at:
|
awesome work, wayne.
|
| * Libspf-alt now has a SPF_result_helo() function to explicitly test
| the HELO string, even if the MAIL FROM is not <>.
|
I expect this is to support the always-check-HELO logic due to Hector Santos?
Mail::SPF::Query needs to catch up :)
(The latest spf draft 200403 adds HELO-first pre-testing, so that HELO
spoofing can be rejected right away without even testing MAIL-FROM.
This is safe because it only rejects upon explicit FAIL; if there's
anything else, it goes on to the usual SPF testing of return-path, which
provides the canonical result.)
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel@v2.listbox.com
|
| A new version of the alternate C implementation of SPF (libspf-alt) is
| now available at:
|
awesome work, wayne.
|
| * Libspf-alt now has a SPF_result_helo() function to explicitly test
| the HELO string, even if the MAIL FROM is not <>.
|
I expect this is to support the always-check-HELO logic due to Hector Santos?
Mail::SPF::Query needs to catch up :)
(The latest spf draft 200403 adds HELO-first pre-testing, so that HELO
spoofing can be rejected right away without even testing MAIL-FROM.
This is safe because it only rejects upon explicit FAIL; if there's
anything else, it goes on to the usual SPF testing of return-path, which
provides the canonical result.)
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel@v2.listbox.com