I was wondering how more experienced spamassassin admins have been
assigning scores to rules that are relevant to their site (and also per
user if need be). I've installed a few "aftermarket" rulesets now, and
some of the values are (IMO) either too low or two high based on how
many show up in the spams and hams i examine.
Is there a good methodology to figuring out appropriate scores? I was
thinking of writing a script that would look at the proportion of
ham/spam that this rule applies to, but that gives me a percentage, but
not a value.
How are you all doing it?
Blaise. <blaise@geeky.net>
--------------------------------
Random IRC quote:
<BombScare> i beat the internet
<BombScare> the end guy is hard
assigning scores to rules that are relevant to their site (and also per
user if need be). I've installed a few "aftermarket" rulesets now, and
some of the values are (IMO) either too low or two high based on how
many show up in the spams and hams i examine.
Is there a good methodology to figuring out appropriate scores? I was
thinking of writing a script that would look at the proportion of
ham/spam that this rule applies to, but that gives me a percentage, but
not a value.
How are you all doing it?
Blaise. <blaise@geeky.net>
--------------------------------
Random IRC quote:
<BombScare> i beat the internet
<BombScare> the end guy is hard