As of this morning almost all mail that is going through our mail server is
being marked as spam.
Even mails with a seemingly normal header/content are marked spam.
e.g.
====
Return-Path: <owner-list@dclug.org.uk>
Received: from syntaxica.ensim.dedicated-servers.co.uk (root@localhost)
by syntaxica.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2FCuv618701
for <neilr@syntaxica.co.uk>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:56:57 GMT
X-ClientAddr: 212.67.197.71
Received: from pi.a-squared.co.uk (pi.a-squared.co.uk [212.67.197.71])
by syntaxica.ensim.dedicated-servers.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
i2FCtob18663
for <neilr@syntaxica.co.uk>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:55:50 GMT
Received: from majordom by pi.a-squared.co.uk with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1B2rcP-0005FO-Ro
for list-out@dclug.org.uk; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:54:57 +0000
Received: from mx5.ifl.net ([194.154.16.100])
by pi.a-squared.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1B2rcP-0005FJ-MD
for list@dclug.org.uk; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:54:57 +0000
Received: from mx0.swgfl.ifl.net (mx.swgfl.ifl.net [62.171.194.109])
by mx5.ifl.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2FCsvn5002367
for <list@dclug.org.uk>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:54:57 GMT
Received: from basil.callington-comm.cornwall.sch.uk
(curric-station-102.callington-comm.cornwall.sch.uk [10.0.12.117])
by mx0.swgfl.ifl.net (8.12.10/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i2FCsops011032
for <list@dclug.org.uk>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:54:55 GMT
Received: from jwonlaptop (unknown [10.0.14.176])
by basil.callington-comm.cornwall.sch.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAA42765
for <list@dclug.org.uk>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:56:22 +0000 (GMT)
From: "James Wonnacott" <jwon@callington-comm.cornwall.sch.uk>
To: <list@dclug.org.uk>
Subject: {Spam?} RE: [LUG] LUG BBQ?
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:52:54 -0000
Organization: Callington Community College
Message-ID: <000001c40a8c$6ee81820$b00e000a@callingtoncomm.cornwall.sch.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
In-Reply-To: <22997094-765F-11D8-BA8C-000A9580D75E@littlebigfoot.org.uk>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-IFL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the IFL support for more
information
X-IFL-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: jwon@callington-comm.cornwall.sch.uk
Sender: owner-list@dclug.org.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: list@dclug.org.uk
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, Infinite-Monkeys, SpamAssassin (score=-12.3,
required 5, BAYES_01, IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS)
Status:
================================
So why with a score of -12.3 is this marked as spam? Any help appreciated.
Neil.
being marked as spam.
Even mails with a seemingly normal header/content are marked spam.
e.g.
====
Return-Path: <owner-list@dclug.org.uk>
Received: from syntaxica.ensim.dedicated-servers.co.uk (root@localhost)
by syntaxica.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2FCuv618701
for <neilr@syntaxica.co.uk>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:56:57 GMT
X-ClientAddr: 212.67.197.71
Received: from pi.a-squared.co.uk (pi.a-squared.co.uk [212.67.197.71])
by syntaxica.ensim.dedicated-servers.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
i2FCtob18663
for <neilr@syntaxica.co.uk>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:55:50 GMT
Received: from majordom by pi.a-squared.co.uk with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1B2rcP-0005FO-Ro
for list-out@dclug.org.uk; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:54:57 +0000
Received: from mx5.ifl.net ([194.154.16.100])
by pi.a-squared.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1B2rcP-0005FJ-MD
for list@dclug.org.uk; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:54:57 +0000
Received: from mx0.swgfl.ifl.net (mx.swgfl.ifl.net [62.171.194.109])
by mx5.ifl.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2FCsvn5002367
for <list@dclug.org.uk>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:54:57 GMT
Received: from basil.callington-comm.cornwall.sch.uk
(curric-station-102.callington-comm.cornwall.sch.uk [10.0.12.117])
by mx0.swgfl.ifl.net (8.12.10/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i2FCsops011032
for <list@dclug.org.uk>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:54:55 GMT
Received: from jwonlaptop (unknown [10.0.14.176])
by basil.callington-comm.cornwall.sch.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAA42765
for <list@dclug.org.uk>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:56:22 +0000 (GMT)
From: "James Wonnacott" <jwon@callington-comm.cornwall.sch.uk>
To: <list@dclug.org.uk>
Subject: {Spam?} RE: [LUG] LUG BBQ?
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:52:54 -0000
Organization: Callington Community College
Message-ID: <000001c40a8c$6ee81820$b00e000a@callingtoncomm.cornwall.sch.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
In-Reply-To: <22997094-765F-11D8-BA8C-000A9580D75E@littlebigfoot.org.uk>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-IFL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the IFL support for more
information
X-IFL-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: jwon@callington-comm.cornwall.sch.uk
Sender: owner-list@dclug.org.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: list@dclug.org.uk
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, Infinite-Monkeys, SpamAssassin (score=-12.3,
required 5, BAYES_01, IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS)
Status:
================================
So why with a score of -12.3 is this marked as spam? Any help appreciated.
Neil.