/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/20_dnsbl_tests.cf:#askdns
DKIMDOMAIN_IN_DWL _DKIMDOMAIN_._vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org TXT /^([a-z]+
)*(transaction|list|all)( [a-z]+)*$/
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/20_dnsbl_tests.cf:#askdns
__DKIMDOMAIN_IN_DWL_ANY _DKIMDOMAIN_._vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org TXT
note _vouch have the underscore to disable
https://www.isc.org/blogs/qname-minimization-and-privacy/
so as today there is no rules that is not qname compatible ?
but i still is not sure its now safe to enable qname-minimization in
bind9 named.conf
# qname-minimization ( strict | relaxed | disabled | off );
qname-minimization disabled;
in named.conf options section
is spamassassin rules 100% bugfree with it ?
DKIMDOMAIN_IN_DWL _DKIMDOMAIN_._vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org TXT /^([a-z]+
)*(transaction|list|all)( [a-z]+)*$/
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004006/updates_spamassassin_org/20_dnsbl_tests.cf:#askdns
__DKIMDOMAIN_IN_DWL_ANY _DKIMDOMAIN_._vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org TXT
note _vouch have the underscore to disable
https://www.isc.org/blogs/qname-minimization-and-privacy/
so as today there is no rules that is not qname compatible ?
but i still is not sure its now safe to enable qname-minimization in
bind9 named.conf
# qname-minimization ( strict | relaxed | disabled | off );
qname-minimization disabled;
in named.conf options section
is spamassassin rules 100% bugfree with it ?