Mailing List Archive

On 15.03.22 22:21, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
>By chance, i found some site dkimwl.org on googling. Well i like very
>much dkim based white-lists. How credible is that dkimwl.org? And how
>can i use that stuff with SpamAssassin?

looks like it's used already:

72_scores.cf:score DKIMWL_BL 0.001 2.996 0.001 2.996
72_scores.cf:score DKIMWL_BLOCKED 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
72_scores.cf:score DKIMWL_WL_HIGH 0.001 -1.498 0.001 -1.498
72_scores.cf:score DKIMWL_WL_MED 0.001 -0.001 0.001 -0.001
72_scores.cf:score DKIMWL_WL_MEDHI 0.001 -0.001 0.001 -0.001

and I have already disables using of this check for autolearning:

tflags DKIMWL_WL_HIGH noautolearn net nice


--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol.

Dear Matus,

Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk> writes:

> On 15.03.22 22:21, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
>>By chance, i found some site dkimwl.org on googling. Well i like very
>>much dkim based white-lists. How credible is that dkimwl.org? And how
>>can i use that stuff with SpamAssassin?
>
> looks like it's used already:
>
> 72_scores.cf:score DKIMWL_BL 0.001 2.996 0.001 2.996
> 72_scores.cf:score DKIMWL_BLOCKED 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
> 72_scores.cf:score DKIMWL_WL_HIGH 0.001 -1.498 0.001 -1.498
> 72_scores.cf:score DKIMWL_WL_MED 0.001 -0.001 0.001 -0.001
> 72_scores.cf:score DKIMWL_WL_MEDHI 0.001 -0.001 0.001 -0.001

Oh thanks!

> and I have already disables using of this check for autolearning:
>
> tflags DKIMWL_WL_HIGH noautolearn net nice

Thanks again, Matus ^^^

Sincerely, Byung-Hee from South Korea

--
^????? _????_ ?????_^))//