-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 13 February 2004 19:53, Gary Funck wrote:
> > From: Douglas Kirkland [mailto:douglas@slugstone.net]
> > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 7:42 PM
> [...]
> >
> > The problem I is spamassassin has to many options to work with.
> > What you want
> > maybe not what I want. Like which rules will the user be allow
> > to change the
> > score. There is just to many for a normal user to understand.
> > Then there
> > would be the poor tech suport guy having the explain each one.
>
> I think that a user-oriented GUI would let the user tweak every SA option,
> but the just the ones that would give them the 80/20 types of control.
> I wouldn't let them adjust rule scores, but just the overall threshold
> for example.
>
> > No thanks you. Please build your own, it is not that difficuit to do.
>
> I've already got it; it's called 'vi'. <g>
I use 'vi' to change my user_prefs file. I also build a web interface to the
user_prefs for our customers. It has spam threshhold, Report Safe, Contact
Info, Subject-line for Spam, ok_languages, ok_locales, white list, and black
list. Also allow them to set scores for these three SpamCop.net, HTML Web
Bugs, and MS Executable. Scoring is a big part for spamassassin so that
should not be left out. I would like to get a few more in the web interface,
but I just am not sure which one to add.
Douglas
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFALkTrSpWn8R0Z08URAkWlAKCXmFHx8QtDnSq/Q2iXpv7tGFRy0ACfQ/nH
am+xQ60PTlPhmtXYltFPkcA=
=igc2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 13 February 2004 19:53, Gary Funck wrote:
> > From: Douglas Kirkland [mailto:douglas@slugstone.net]
> > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 7:42 PM
> [...]
> >
> > The problem I is spamassassin has to many options to work with.
> > What you want
> > maybe not what I want. Like which rules will the user be allow
> > to change the
> > score. There is just to many for a normal user to understand.
> > Then there
> > would be the poor tech suport guy having the explain each one.
>
> I think that a user-oriented GUI would let the user tweak every SA option,
> but the just the ones that would give them the 80/20 types of control.
> I wouldn't let them adjust rule scores, but just the overall threshold
> for example.
>
> > No thanks you. Please build your own, it is not that difficuit to do.
>
> I've already got it; it's called 'vi'. <g>
I use 'vi' to change my user_prefs file. I also build a web interface to the
user_prefs for our customers. It has spam threshhold, Report Safe, Contact
Info, Subject-line for Spam, ok_languages, ok_locales, white list, and black
list. Also allow them to set scores for these three SpamCop.net, HTML Web
Bugs, and MS Executable. Scoring is a big part for spamassassin so that
should not be left out. I would like to get a few more in the web interface,
but I just am not sure which one to add.
Douglas
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFALkTrSpWn8R0Z08URAkWlAKCXmFHx8QtDnSq/Q2iXpv7tGFRy0ACfQ/nH
am+xQ60PTlPhmtXYltFPkcA=
=igc2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----