Mailing List Archive: SpamAssassin: devel

Subject

Author

Replies

Last Post

[Bug 2197] SQL failover patch

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 15, 2004, 3:01 PM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 15, 2004, 3:01 PM →

[Bug 2196] FRAUDELENT_URL rule: when user:pw@ looks like hostname to deceive people (cnn.com/paypal. ...

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 15, 2004, 3:01 PM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 15, 2004, 3:01 PM →

[Bug 2266] New features: Tokens in report, status of Bayesian classification.

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 15, 2004, 3:00 PM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 15, 2004, 3:00 PM →

[Bug 3029] spamc ignores report_safe

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 10, 2004, 8:46 PM | 1 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 15, 2004, 2:39 PM →

[Bug 787] Split off spamc into separate, autoconf distro

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 15, 2004, 2:30 PM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 15, 2004, 2:30 PM →

[Bug 1010] Add support for Email::IsFree-based rules

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 15, 2004, 2:28 PM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 15, 2004, 2:28 PM →

[Bug 3043] Too many things you cannot match

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 13, 2004, 3:41 PM | 1 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 15, 2004, 1:28 PM →

[Bug 3047] Spell Checker

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 14, 2004, 8:58 PM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 14, 2004, 8:58 PM →

[Bug 3047] New: Spell Checker

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 14, 2004, 7:44 PM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 14, 2004, 7:44 PM →

Auto Whitelist Question

by rozer at ois-online | Feb 14, 2004, 2:10 PM | 1 replies →

rozer at ois-online

Feb 14, 2004, 2:21 PM →

[Bug 3046] New: spamd forces unix domain sockets to spamd user owned, mode 0666

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 14, 2004, 12:49 PM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 14, 2004, 12:49 PM →

secure use of spamd running as root

by marc at mit | Feb 13, 2004, 9:26 PM | 1 replies →

marc at mit

Feb 14, 2004, 12:19 PM →

Should we "remove" the code from SF.net CVS?

by msquadrat.nospamplease at gmx | Feb 13, 2004, 6:29 AM | 11 replies →

msquadrat.nospamplease at gmx

Feb 14, 2004, 10:13 AM →

MsgParser API change (was: Re: renaming PerMsgStatus class)

by felicity at kluge | Feb 14, 2004, 8:52 AM | 0 replies →

felicity at kluge

Feb 14, 2004, 8:52 AM →

[Bug 3045] New: need a clean-text test of all text attachments

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 13, 2004, 5:11 PM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 13, 2004, 5:11 PM →

[Bug 3044] New: SpamAssassin::find_all_addrs_in_line() misses addresses

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 13, 2004, 4:25 PM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 13, 2004, 4:25 PM →

[Bug 3043] New: Too many things you cannot match

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 13, 2004, 3:40 PM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 13, 2004, 3:40 PM →

[Bug 3041] WIN32 build is broken

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 13, 2004, 6:14 AM | 2 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 13, 2004, 6:38 AM →

[Bug 3040] Unavailabe general use code in CVS

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 13, 2004, 6:19 AM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 13, 2004, 6:19 AM →

[Bug 3042] New: DoS attack possible with blackhole dns server

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 13, 2004, 5:44 AM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 13, 2004, 5:44 AM →

[Bug 3041] New: WIN32 build is broken

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 13, 2004, 4:58 AM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 13, 2004, 4:58 AM →

[Bug 3040] New: Unavailabe general use code in CVS

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 13, 2004, 4:38 AM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 13, 2004, 4:38 AM →

[Bug 3036] Cannot have two whitelist_from_rcvd entries for same address with different relays

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 13, 2004, 4:01 AM | 0 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 13, 2004, 4:01 AM →

Re: one question

by jm at jmason | Feb 12, 2004, 11:07 PM | 1 replies →

jm at jmason

Feb 12, 2004, 11:59 PM →

[Bug 3039] New: superserver compatibility

by bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla | Feb 12, 2004, 11:44 PM | 1 replies →

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Feb 12, 2004, 11:57 PM →