http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2892
Summary: Disregard attempts at Bayes poison
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.61
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: spamassassin-dev@incubator.apache.org
ReportedBy: shiva@sewingwitch.com
Looking at some recent spam, I see two mechanisms to introduce non-visible Bayes
poison:
1. Put the poison in an alternative text/plain part on the assumption that most
users will prefer the HTML alternative.
2. Put poison after a </HTML> tag in the HTML part.
I'd like to suggest, for purposes of Bayes learning, ignoring the content of a
text/plain part if the HTML part has significant content, and ignoring anything
after an </HTML> tag.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Summary: Disregard attempts at Bayes poison
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.61
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: spamassassin-dev@incubator.apache.org
ReportedBy: shiva@sewingwitch.com
Looking at some recent spam, I see two mechanisms to introduce non-visible Bayes
poison:
1. Put the poison in an alternative text/plain part on the assumption that most
users will prefer the HTML alternative.
2. Put poison after a </HTML> tag in the HTML part.
I'd like to suggest, for purposes of Bayes learning, ignoring the content of a
text/plain part if the HTML part has significant content, and ignoring anything
after an </HTML> tag.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.