Mailing List Archive

This is not a hard requirement as long as the older version links. The 2.0.0
was a conservative choice we made when adding the check logic. I don't have a
version with an older release to test, but I think I initially developed it
with 1.something. So if you can confirm that the compile/link successes with
1.4.1, I'll happily change the check condition.

As a side-note, do you have the RPMs available publically? Or would like to
contribute them? A lot of folks have recently asked for RHEL RPMs...

Rainer

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rsyslog-bounces@lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog-
> bounces@lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of David Gillies
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:15 AM
> To: rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com
> Subject: [rsyslog] rsyslog 3.21.11 and gnutls
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've been rolling my own rsyslog 3.21.x rpms for centos5/rhel5 for a
> while now. I noticed in the latest rsyslog version 3.21.11 that running
> ./configure says that the build requires atleast gnutls 2.0.0. Is this a
> hard requirement, as rhel5/centos5 only has gnutls 1.4.1.
>
> David Gillies
> Systems Engineer
> Digital Infrastructure Services
> Fairfax Digital
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
> files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient,
> any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of
> this e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is
> subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or
> communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you
> have received this e-mail in error please advise the sender immediately
> by return e-mail or telephone and delete all copies. Fairfax does not
> guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in
> this e-mail or attached files. Internet communications are not secure,
> therefore Fairfax does not accept legal responsibility for the contents
> of this message or attached files.
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

Thanks Rainer,

I haven't had a chance to build rsyslog against RHEL's gnutls but I'll
give it a try tomorrow and report back.

In regards to your side note, I actually just used the rsyslog spec file
from the fedora project:

http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/rsyslog/

In that CVS repo there's the spec file and a couple of other pieces
which makes rsyslog fit into a RHEL/Fedora/CentOS box in the Red Hat way
of doing things.

I believe the fedora project are using that spec file for FC10 and FC11
but I've had no issues with it on RHEL5/CentOS5.

David Gillies
Systems Engineer
Digital Infrastructure Services
Fairfax Digital

-----Original Message-----
From: rsyslog-bounces@lists.adiscon.com
[mailto:rsyslog-bounces@lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards
Sent: Thursday, 16 April 2009 4:05 PM
To: rsyslog-users
Subject: Re: [rsyslog] rsyslog 3.21.11 and gnutls

This is not a hard requirement as long as the older version links. The
2.0.0 was a conservative choice we made when adding the check logic. I
don't have a version with an older release to test, but I think I
initially developed it with 1.something. So if you can confirm that the
compile/link successes with 1.4.1, I'll happily change the check
condition.

As a side-note, do you have the RPMs available publically? Or would like
to contribute them? A lot of folks have recently asked for RHEL RPMs...

Rainer

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rsyslog-bounces@lists.adiscon.com [mailto:rsyslog-
> bounces@lists.adiscon.com] On Behalf Of David Gillies
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:15 AM
> To: rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com
> Subject: [rsyslog] rsyslog 3.21.11 and gnutls
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've been rolling my own rsyslog 3.21.x rpms for centos5/rhel5 for a
> while now. I noticed in the latest rsyslog version 3.21.11 that
> running ./configure says that the build requires atleast gnutls 2.0.0.

> Is this a hard requirement, as rhel5/centos5 only has gnutls 1.4.1.
>
> David Gillies
> Systems Engineer
> Digital Infrastructure Services
> Fairfax Digital
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
> files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended
> recipient, any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or
> copying of this e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This
> e-mail is subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced,
> adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright
> owner. If you have received this e-mail in error please advise the
> sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and delete all
> copies. Fairfax does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any

> information contained in this e-mail or attached files. Internet
> communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax does not accept legal

> responsibility for the contents of this message or attached files.
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and delete all copies. Fairfax does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files. Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached files.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com