Hi,
I'd like to ask if it's normal that %timegenerated:::date-subseconds%
returns a value lower than %timereported:::date-subseconds%.
Intuitively I'd say it is since this makes sense by taking in
consideration the property names.
Still, since the documentation says that timegenerated is the
timestamp when the message was received I would have expected a value
higher than the one returned by timereported.
I'm afraid this is a dumb question but this behaviour got me confused,
if anyone could shed some light on this I'd be grateful. Thanks.
Regards,
Luigi
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com
I'd like to ask if it's normal that %timegenerated:::date-subseconds%
returns a value lower than %timereported:::date-subseconds%.
Intuitively I'd say it is since this makes sense by taking in
consideration the property names.
Still, since the documentation says that timegenerated is the
timestamp when the message was received I would have expected a value
higher than the one returned by timereported.
I'm afraid this is a dumb question but this behaviour got me confused,
if anyone could shed some light on this I'd be grateful. Thanks.
Regards,
Luigi
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com