Hello, I'm using OSPF on mininet and I'm having some issue
.[cid:part1.49BBF8C8.DE1A87C6@live.com]
I'm setting the link speed with mininet when defining the topology, however this doesn't seem to affect the ospf cost computation.
By sniffing some traffic I've noticed that all the LS Update messages contain a metric=100, even though the different link speed should affect the computation.
For example to go from R6 to R4 I'd expect a cost of 2 going through Ri4 and a cost of 20 going through R5.
This is an example of the ospf.conf file I'm using on each router:
hostname r6
log file /var/log/quagga/r6.log
router ospf
auto-cost reference-bandwidth 100
network 172.168.6.0/24 area 0
network 172.168.34.0/24 area 0
network 172.168.5.0/24 area 0
network 172.168.35.0/24 area 0
Could the area parameter be causing this unexpected behavior?
.[cid:part1.49BBF8C8.DE1A87C6@live.com]
I'm setting the link speed with mininet when defining the topology, however this doesn't seem to affect the ospf cost computation.
By sniffing some traffic I've noticed that all the LS Update messages contain a metric=100, even though the different link speed should affect the computation.
For example to go from R6 to R4 I'd expect a cost of 2 going through Ri4 and a cost of 20 going through R5.
This is an example of the ospf.conf file I'm using on each router:
hostname r6
log file /var/log/quagga/r6.log
router ospf
auto-cost reference-bandwidth 100
network 172.168.6.0/24 area 0
network 172.168.34.0/24 area 0
network 172.168.5.0/24 area 0
network 172.168.35.0/24 area 0
Could the area parameter be causing this unexpected behavior?