Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug
report.
http://bugzilla.quagga.net/show_bug.cgi?id=198
------- Additional Comments From louis.lagendijk@gmail.com 2005-06-11 22:30 -------
rt_netlink.c does refer to inet6_ntoa (p->u.prefix6) even when ipv6 is disabled
(in calls to zlog_debug). I suppose that the check for (family == AF_INET) is
superfluous. I ran into this issue compiling quagga for a mipsel based router.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug
report.
http://bugzilla.quagga.net/show_bug.cgi?id=198
------- Additional Comments From louis.lagendijk@gmail.com 2005-06-11 22:30 -------
rt_netlink.c does refer to inet6_ntoa (p->u.prefix6) even when ipv6 is disabled
(in calls to zlog_debug). I suppose that the check for (family == AF_INET) is
superfluous. I ran into this issue compiling quagga for a mipsel based router.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.