Scott Schwartz:
> If people are seriously advocating running two copies of qmail, then I
> want all the virtualdomain stuff deleted, since running N copies would
> do the job there too.
Won't work. Virtual domains is for incoming mail, multiple copies of
qmail is only good for outgoing mail (unless you also get into
multiple ip addresses and running each qmail on different address).
I expect you're right if you meant to say that multiple queues without
multiple binaries would be more elegant than this approach.
However, also note that qmail has been released as version 1.0 --
while Dan may release another version, I don't expect the current
traffic would be very encouraging in making that happen. Most of the
change requests I've seen have been very strident and demanding.
It's true that a feature wish list would be a good thing to have when
constructing a new version. But when there's such a volume of traffic
that's aimed at points which are already addressed in the current
documentation (e.g. in files [A-Z]* and *.[1-8]), I know I'd be
somewhat less than encouraged. Of course, Dan is probably more
resilient than I, but still...
What makes you think Dan wants to dredge through a whole bunch of
demanding drivel looking for a few pearls of wisdom? I mean, not that
he has any alternative, but couldn't this mailing list be a bit more
constructive?
--
Raul