On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Ishikawa wrote:
> I am curious about this thread:
>
> Why don't relevant references to read/write use atomicio() in
> atomicio.c?
I agree.
Anyone who has been experiencing problems with scp, please try the
attached patch. It replaces all plain read() and write() calls with
atomicio() reads and writes().
Regards,
Damien Miller
--
| "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox
| Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/
| Email: djm@mindrot.org (home) -or- djm@ibs.com.au (work)
> I am curious about this thread:
>
> Why don't relevant references to read/write use atomicio() in
> atomicio.c?
I agree.
Anyone who has been experiencing problems with scp, please try the
attached patch. It replaces all plain read() and write() calls with
atomicio() reads and writes().
Regards,
Damien Miller
--
| "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox
| Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/
| Email: djm@mindrot.org (home) -or- djm@ibs.com.au (work)