Mailing List Archive

Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back?
Thanks,

Hank
Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back? [ In reply to ]
Hi,

Not a direct answer to your question, but if you're not aware of it, https://bgp.tools/ is a great tool and shows the same info.

Ian
Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back? [ In reply to ]
As someone said on a different thread, and it worked for me, check your
ad/script blockers. I disabled mine for the site and the site came back
to life for me.

A

--
Alec Edworthy
A.Edworthy@lboro.ac.uk
Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back? [ In reply to ]
My Windows Chrome nor Android Chrome have any ad/script blockers. Both
showed me the error page. Looks like it's showing me the tool now, though.

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:10?PM Alec Edworthy <A.Edworthy@lboro.ac.uk>
wrote:

> As someone said on a different thread, and it worked for me, check your
> ad/script blockers. I disabled mine for the site and the site came back
> to life for me.
>
> A
>
> --
> Alec Edworthy
> A.Edworthy@lboro.ac.uk
>
>
Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back? [ In reply to ]
On 1/16/24 2:44 PM, Ian Chilton wrote:

> Not a direct answer to your question, but if you're not aware of it,
> https://bgp.tools/ <https://bgp.tools/> is a great tool and shows the
> same info.
--------------------------------------

They need to fix their page regarding cost.

Originates less than a /15 - 25 pounds/month

Originates more than a /15 - 200 pounds/month.

What if someone originates a /15? That's one of the prefix sizes we
originate. They need a 'less than or equal to' thingie in there.

scott
Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back? [ In reply to ]
scott via NANOG writes:

> What if someone originates a /15? That's one of the prefix sizes we
> originate. They need a 'less than or equal to' thingie in there.

I've asked the maintainer of this service (whom I recently met and who
might not be on NANOG) to clarify this.
Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back? [ In reply to ]
It only applies if you are purchasing their monitoring services. Not just
to use the site for info.

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 5:04?PM scott via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 1/16/24 2:44 PM, Ian Chilton wrote:
>
> > Not a direct answer to your question, but if you're not aware of it,
> > https://bgp.tools/ <https://bgp.tools/> is a great tool and shows the
> > same info.
> --------------------------------------
>
> They need to fix their page regarding cost.
>
> Originates less than a /15 - 25 pounds/month
>
> Originates more than a /15 - 200 pounds/month.
>
> What if someone originates a /15? That's one of the prefix sizes we
> originate. They need a 'less than or equal to' thingie in there.
>
> scott
>
Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back? [ In reply to ]
Fixed, cheers for pointing that logical error out :)

$ git show
commit 689bca929c5d3a27e6aa4f12195bf3b81b3be719 (HEAD -> master)
Author: Ben Cartwright-Cox <x>
Date: Tue Jan 16 23:17:08 2024 +0000

clarify pricing for a nanog person

https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2024-January/224556.html

diff --git a/www/templates/layouts/utils.tmpl.html
b/www/templates/layouts/utils.tmpl.html
index 5d1a4dbd..3ca554a3 100644
--- a/www/templates/layouts/utils.tmpl.html
+++ b/www/templates/layouts/utils.tmpl.html
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@
<div class="card-body">
<h1 class="card-title pricing-card-title">£200 <small
class="text-muted">/ mo</small></h1>
<ul class="list-unstyled mt-3 mb-4">
- <li>Originates more than a /15 of IPv4</li>
+ <li>Originates a /15 or more of IPv4 addresses</li>
<li>-</li>
<li>Is tagged as a <a href="/tags/cdn">CDN</a> or <a
href="/tags/ddosm">DDoS Mitigation provider</a></li>
<li>-</li>

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:04?PM scott via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/16/24 2:44 PM, Ian Chilton wrote:
>
> > Not a direct answer to your question, but if you're not aware of it,
> > https://bgp.tools/ <https://bgp.tools/> is a great tool and shows the
> > same info.
> --------------------------------------
>
> They need to fix their page regarding cost.
>
> Originates less than a /15 - 25 pounds/month
>
> Originates more than a /15 - 200 pounds/month.
>
> What if someone originates a /15? That's one of the prefix sizes we
> originate. They need a 'less than or equal to' thingie in there.
>
> scott
Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back? [ In reply to ]
+1 for bgp.tools, it is a superior tool. Sadly, the corporate IT-forced DNS filtering at work for “cybersecurity” (Mimecast) thinks it is a compromised website for some reason, so bgp.he.net<http://bgp.he.net> ends up being used while I am at the office.

On Jan 16, 2024, at 8:44?AM, Ian Chilton <ian@ichilton.co.uk> wrote:

Hi,

Not a direct answer to your question, but if you're not aware of it, https://bgp.tools/ is a great tool and shows the same info.

Ian
Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back? [ In reply to ]
:: On 1/16/24 11:20 PM, Ben Cox wrote:

:: Fixed, cheers for pointing that logical error out :)


Thanks!

scott




On 1/16/24 11:20 PM, Ben Cox wrote:
> Fixed, cheers for pointing that logical error out :)
>
> $ git show
> commit 689bca929c5d3a27e6aa4f12195bf3b81b3be719 (HEAD -> master)
> Author: Ben Cartwright-Cox <x>
> Date: Tue Jan 16 23:17:08 2024 +0000
>
> clarify pricing for a nanog person
>
> https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2024-January/224556.html
>
> diff --git a/www/templates/layouts/utils.tmpl.html
> b/www/templates/layouts/utils.tmpl.html
> index 5d1a4dbd..3ca554a3 100644
> --- a/www/templates/layouts/utils.tmpl.html
> +++ b/www/templates/layouts/utils.tmpl.html
> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@
> <div class="card-body">
> <h1 class="card-title pricing-card-title">£200 <small
> class="text-muted">/ mo</small></h1>
> <ul class="list-unstyled mt-3 mb-4">
> - <li>Originates more than a /15 of IPv4</li>
> + <li>Originates a /15 or more of IPv4 addresses</li>
> <li>-</li>
> <li>Is tagged as a <a href="/tags/cdn">CDN</a> or <a
> href="/tags/ddosm">DDoS Mitigation provider</a></li>
> <li>-</li>
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:04?PM scott via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/16/24 2:44 PM, Ian Chilton wrote:
>>
>>> Not a direct answer to your question, but if you're not aware of it,
>>> https://bgp.tools/ <https://bgp.tools/> is a great tool and shows the
>>> same info.
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> They need to fix their page regarding cost.
>>
>> Originates less than a /15 - 25 pounds/month
>>
>> Originates more than a /15 - 200 pounds/month.
>>
>> What if someone originates a /15? That's one of the prefix sizes we
>> originate. They need a 'less than or equal to' thingie in there.
>>
>> scott
>
Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back? [ In reply to ]
It might be due to usage of a new gTLD like .tools. A number of new
gTLDs use heavy discounting and this is a magnet for abusive
registrations, unfortunately.

Rubens

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 2:15?PM Tim Burke <tim@mid.net> wrote:
>
> +1 for bgp.tools, it is a superior tool. Sadly, the corporate IT-forced DNS filtering at work for “cybersecurity” (Mimecast) thinks it is a compromised website for some reason, so bgp.he.net ends up being used while I am at the office.
>
> On Jan 16, 2024, at 8:44?AM, Ian Chilton <ian@ichilton.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Not a direct answer to your question, but if you're not aware of it, https://bgp.tools/ is a great tool and shows the same info.
>
> Ian
>
>
Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back? [ In reply to ]
It'd be interesting to know how Mimecast made the determination that
bgp.tools is compromised.

Regards,
Christopher Hawker

On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 09:47, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com> wrote:

> It might be due to usage of a new gTLD like .tools. A number of new
> gTLDs use heavy discounting and this is a magnet for abusive
> registrations, unfortunately.
>
> Rubens
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 2:15?PM Tim Burke <tim@mid.net> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for bgp.tools, it is a superior tool. Sadly, the corporate IT-forced
> DNS filtering at work for “cybersecurity” (Mimecast) thinks it is a
> compromised website for some reason, so bgp.he.net ends up being used
> while I am at the office.
> >
> > On Jan 16, 2024, at 8:44?AM, Ian Chilton <ian@ichilton.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Not a direct answer to your question, but if you're not aware of it,
> https://bgp.tools/ is a great tool and shows the same info.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> >
>
Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back? [ In reply to ]
I spoke with someone at Mimecast and we concluded the the customer of
mimecast has setup that rule (likely the whole of *.tools), since they
could not find anything on there end that didnt like bgp.tools



On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:54?PM Christopher Hawker
<chris@thesysadmin.au> wrote:
>
> It'd be interesting to know how Mimecast made the determination that bgp.tools is compromised.
>
> Regards,
> Christopher Hawker
>
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 09:47, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It might be due to usage of a new gTLD like .tools. A number of new
>> gTLDs use heavy discounting and this is a magnet for abusive
>> registrations, unfortunately.
>>
>> Rubens
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 2:15?PM Tim Burke <tim@mid.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 for bgp.tools, it is a superior tool. Sadly, the corporate IT-forced DNS filtering at work for “cybersecurity” (Mimecast) thinks it is a compromised website for some reason, so bgp.he.net ends up being used while I am at the office.
>> >
>> > On Jan 16, 2024, at 8:44?AM, Ian Chilton <ian@ichilton.co.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Not a direct answer to your question, but if you're not aware of it, https://bgp.tools/ is a great tool and shows the same info.
>> >
>> > Ian
>> >
>> >
Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back? [ In reply to ]
I tried going to bgp.tools at the office the day after I sent that email and was able to get to it, so must've just been some goofiness.
________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+tim=mid.net@nanog.org> on behalf of Ben Cox via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 7:51 AM
To: chris@thesysadmin.au <chris@thesysadmin.au>
Cc: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back?

I spoke with someone at Mimecast and we concluded the the customer of
mimecast has setup that rule (likely the whole of *.tools), since they
could not find anything on there end that didnt like bgp.tools



On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:54?PM Christopher Hawker
<chris@thesysadmin.au> wrote:
>
> It'd be interesting to know how Mimecast made the determination that bgp.tools is compromised.
>
> Regards,
> Christopher Hawker
>
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 09:47, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It might be due to usage of a new gTLD like .tools. A number of new
>> gTLDs use heavy discounting and this is a magnet for abusive
>> registrations, unfortunately.
>>
>> Rubens
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 2:15?PM Tim Burke <tim@mid.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 for bgp.tools, it is a superior tool. Sadly, the corporate IT-forced DNS filtering at work for “cybersecurity” (Mimecast) thinks it is a compromised website for some reason, so bgp.he.net ends up being used while I am at the office.
>> >
>> > On Jan 16, 2024, at 8:44?AM, Ian Chilton <ian@ichilton.co.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Not a direct answer to your question, but if you're not aware of it, https://bgp.tools/ is a great tool and shows the same info.
>> >
>> > Ian
>> >
>> >