Mailing List Archive

1 2 3  View All
Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) [ In reply to ]
I don't even know where this conversation has gone anymore.




-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions

Midwest Internet Exchange

The Brothers WISP

----- Original Message -----

From: "Masataka Ohta" <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog@ics-il.net>
Cc: "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>, "Matthew Walster" <matthew@walster.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2023 7:00:07 AM
Subject: Re: SDN Internet Router (sir)

Mike Hammett wrote:

> " With plain IP routers?"

> Yes, or, well, relatively plain, depending on the implementation.

As completely plain routers have no difficulty to treat a
default route, it is a waste of money and effort to try to
have not so plain routers to do so regardless of whether the
routers are SDN ones or not.

Masataka Ohta
Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) [ In reply to ]
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:04:28PM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I don't even know where this conversation has gone anymore.


You have reached a terminal point in the NANOG mailing list state
machine: NOP-ARGUE

Many paths lead to this state, and it isn't unique to NANOG.

The sub-state is: I-THINK
People are now arguing about the relative merits of
their counter argument to what they *THINK* you said.

My take: having the term SDN in the Subject: doomed this conversation.

1 2 3  View All