Mailing List Archive

I guess more correctly these are called Julian's NFCT patches...


On 2013-04-23 10:38, Brent Jensen wrote:

> I run LVS-NAT clusters
with firewalling. I've been using the
> Antefacto patches for years,
however, I just now discovered that they
> are no longer around:
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nfct/
>
> I'm using Centos 5
> (2.6.18-348.x).
It seemed in the past I needed to implement these
> patches, otherwise
my IP Conntrack connections would run up and a lot of
> packets would
get lost/dropped.
>
> (1) Do these still exist somewhere?
>
> (2) Do
I still need these w/ my current configuration (firewalling w/
> LVS-NAT
on 2.6.18 (in other words, did redhat somehow add something to
> where I
no longer need these?)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brent
>
>
_______________________________________________
> Please read the
documentation before posting - it's available at:
>
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing
list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
> Send requests to
lvs-users-request@LinuxVirtualServer.org
> or go to
http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users


_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-request@LinuxVirtualServer.org
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

Hello,

On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Brent Jensen wrote:

> I run LVS-NAT clusters with firewalling. I've been using the
> Antefacto patches for years, however, I just now discovered that they
> are no longer around: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nfct/

It looks like a problem in my ISP, I have to
contact them... I simply didn't noticed it before your
posting.

> I'm using Centos 5
> (2.6.18-348.x). It seemed in the past I needed to implement these
> patches, otherwise my IP Conntrack connections would run up and a lot of
> packets would get lost/dropped.
>
> (1) Do these still exist somewhere?

I'll send you the patch in private message.

> (2) Do I still need these w/ my current configuration (firewalling w/
> LVS-NAT on 2.6.18 (in other words, did redhat somehow add something to
> where I no longer need these?)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brent

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-request@LinuxVirtualServer.org
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

Thanks! Good to know that someone has a backup somewhere ;)

On
2013-04-23 12:25, Julian Anastasov wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 23 Apr
2013, Brent Jensen wrote:
>
>> I run LVS-NAT clusters with firewalling.
I've been using the Antefacto patches for years, however, I just now
discovered that they are no longer around: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nfct/
[1]
>
> It looks like a problem in my ISP, I have to
> contact them...
I simply didn't noticed it before your
> posting.
>
>> I'm using Centos
5 (2.6.18-348.x). It seemed in the past I needed to implement these
patches, otherwise my IP Conntrack connections would run up and a lot of
packets would get lost/dropped. (1) Do these still exist somewhere?
>
>
I'll send you the patch in private message.
> (2) Do I still need these
w/ my cur
>
>> re I no longer need these?) Thanks, Brent
>>
>>
Regards
>>
>> --
>> Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>



Links:
------
[1]
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nfct/
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-request@LinuxVirtualServer.org
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

Hello,

On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Brent Jensen wrote:

> I run LVS-NAT clusters with firewalling. I've been using the
> Antefacto patches for years, however, I just now discovered that they
> are no longer around: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nfct/

It seems I'll have a new address:

http://ja.ssi.bg/
http://ja.ssi.bg/nfct/

you can use it for future reference.

> I'm using Centos 5
> (2.6.18-348.x). It seemed in the past I needed to implement these
> patches, otherwise my IP Conntrack connections would run up and a lot of
> packets would get lost/dropped.
>
> (1) Do these still exist somewhere?
>
>
> (2) Do I still need these w/ my current configuration (firewalling w/
> LVS-NAT on 2.6.18 (in other words, did redhat somehow add something to
> where I no longer need these?)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brent

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-request@LinuxVirtualServer.org
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users