Mailing List Archive: ip tunneling or dr

ip tunneling or dr

Mar 28, 2001, 9:59 PM

Post #1 of 3 (314 views)

Can the response packet from real server go back through virtual server when
i configure ipvs with ip tunneling or direct routing?

I configured that the default route in real server pointed to virtaul server
, and it couldn't work. But when i configured the default route pointed to
another router , it worked well.

what did it mean?

carl
2001-3-29

Re: ip tunneling or dr [ In reply to ]

ja at ssi

Mar 29, 2001, 12:55 AM

Post #2 of 3 (314 views)

Permalink

Hello,

On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, carl.huang [üS½¨äh] wrote:

> Can the response packet from real server go back through virtual server when
> i configure ipvs with ip tunneling or direct routing?
>
> I configured that the default route in real server pointed to virtaul server
> , and it couldn't work. But when i configured the default route pointed to
> another router , it worked well.
>
> what did it mean?

You can try fib* from http://www.linux-vs.org/~julian/

Why do you need such setup?

> carl
> 2001-3-29

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>

Re: ip tunneling or dr [ In reply to ]

mack.joseph at epa

Mar 29, 2001, 4:05 AM

Post #3 of 3 (315 views)

Permalink

carl.huang [üS½¨äh] wrote:
>
> Can the response packet from real server go back through virtual server when
> i configure ipvs with ip tunneling or direct routing?

http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/Joseph.Mack/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO_1.0-12.html#ss12.4

Joe

--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@epa.gov ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA