On May 9, 2005, at 10:48 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> This may be more appropriate for general@, but I don't know who's on
> it.
There is a ruby-dev@lucene list :) (CC'd)
> I was supposed to help Andi Vajda and a few more guys get going with
> PyLucene and RubyLucene incubation. I'm not finding time for that and
> feel pretty bad about it. There is no reason to hold things up - Andi
> and the gang have been ready to incubate for weeks now (probably as
> SWIGLucene, unless somebody comes up with a better name).
>
> Could anyone help them out with writing the proposal, Jira requests,
> general@incubator.apache.org emails, etc.?
>
> Proposal example: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NutchProposal
If the Ruby work is going to be from scratch then no incubation is
necessary. We can give Andi and Brian M. commit privileges to a /
ruby tree easily already to allow that to start happening.
Brian - what say you and the RubyLucene clan?
I sure would love a Ruby version of Lucene right about now.... I
would very likely shift to Rails and RubyLucene instead of the stack
(Tapestry/Cayenne) I'm using now *nudge nudge*.
Erik
> This may be more appropriate for general@, but I don't know who's on
> it.
There is a ruby-dev@lucene list :) (CC'd)
> I was supposed to help Andi Vajda and a few more guys get going with
> PyLucene and RubyLucene incubation. I'm not finding time for that and
> feel pretty bad about it. There is no reason to hold things up - Andi
> and the gang have been ready to incubate for weeks now (probably as
> SWIGLucene, unless somebody comes up with a better name).
>
> Could anyone help them out with writing the proposal, Jira requests,
> general@incubator.apache.org emails, etc.?
>
> Proposal example: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NutchProposal
If the Ruby work is going to be from scratch then no incubation is
necessary. We can give Andi and Brian M. commit privileges to a /
ruby tree easily already to allow that to start happening.
Brian - what say you and the RubyLucene clan?
I sure would love a Ruby version of Lucene right about now.... I
would very likely shift to Rails and RubyLucene instead of the stack
(Tapestry/Cayenne) I'm using now *nudge nudge*.
Erik