On Jan 11, 2008, at 7:43 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
>>>> can you do an ls of /usr/lib/lcrso for me pls?
>>>> looks like the plugin cant be found or wont load
>>>
>>> # ls /usr/lib/lcrso
>>> ls: /usr/lib/lcrso: No such file or directory
>>
>> s/lib/libexec/ ?
>> i forget what defaults are for red hat
>
> [sdubrov@fc-node1 ~]$ ls -l /usr/libexec/lcrso/
> total 972
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 15602 Dec 12 11:46 aisparser.lcrso
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 26982 Dec 12 11:46 objdb.lcrso
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 432973 Dec 12 11:46 service_amf.lcrso
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23977 Dec 12 11:46 service_cfg.lcrso
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 116878 Dec 12 11:46 service_ckpt.lcrso
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 35638 Dec 12 11:46 service_clm.lcrso
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 44795 Dec 12 11:46 service_cpg.lcrso
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23590 Dec 12 11:46 service_evs.lcrso
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 114247 Dec 12 11:46 service_evt.lcrso
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 60107 Dec 12 11:46 service_lck.lcrso
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 48487 Dec 12 11:46 service_msg.lcrso
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23814 Dec 12 11:46 vsf_ykd.lcrso
> [sdubrov@fc-node1 ~]$
>
looks like the pacemaker plugin is missing :-(
i'll fix that tomorrow. in the meantime, if service_crm.so is part of
the package somewhere, copy it to the above directory with a .lcrso
suffix and restart ais...
it should "just work"
>
>>
>>>>> 7. None of the installed packages included ocf RAs. How is it
>>>>> supposed
>>>>> to run resources?
>>>>
>>>> they're in heartbeat-resources
>>>>
>>>> though i'm not 100% sure breaking them out into their own package
>>>> is a
>>>> good idea. thoughts?
>>>
>>> I'm kind of disagree. Without them CRM is almost useless,
>>
>> well in theory the Red Hat (or anyone else) could supply their own
>> set
>> of RAs which could be used instead
>>
>>> so I'd put them into pacemaker-openais.
>>
>> Even if I wanted to (which I'm not convinced I do), there are
>> political problems with doing so and we would start having double
>> maintenance issues.
>> If anything, I'd merge heartbeat-resources with heartbeat-common.
>>> I take it that at the end you are going to get rid of heartbeat-
>>> common.
>>
>> no, no plans for that.
>
> That creates some kind of a confusion at least in the naming of
> packages. Why would I need a heartbeat package if I'm going to use
> openAIS + CRM?
heartbeat-common contains a number of useful libraries and tools (such
as the lrmd) which are useful regardless of which cluster stack one is
using.
In fact clplumbing is useful even if you're not doing clustering at
all - there is a lot of good stuff in there.
> So I'd name them pacemaker-base and pacemaker-openais.
> But I'm agree that it creates political issues :-)
More than anything else, its also not accurate, since the package
comes from the heartbeat project not pacemaker.
I could try and maintain those parts of the code in pacemaker but I
don't have the intention, time or expertise to do so.
There is simply no benefit in trying to.
Everyone repeat after me... Pacemaker is NOT a fork of Heartbeat. The
project contains the CRM and nothing more.
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@clusterlabs.org
http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker