Mailing List Archive

答复: Re: 答复: Re: New patch for resource-agents(nfsserver)
Hi Dejan,

You take the action of checks on the place it should go, better!
Thanks in advance!

Best regards,
John

>>> Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de> 2013-1-24 上午 0:17 >>>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:21:34PM -0700, John Shi wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
> Is this patch OK ? I didn't see the pache going upstream yet.
> Thanks!

Applied now. Can you please also test the attached patch. It is
fairly small and low impact, but still.

Cheers,

Dejan

> Best regards,
> John
>
> >>> Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de> 2012-12-24 下午 17:57 >>>
> Hi John,
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:18:41PM -0700, John Shi wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Fix all cause an error to call rpc.statd, including:
> >
> > Specify the value of nfs_notify_cmd should be either sm-notify or rpc.statd in meta_data.
> > Rename the parameter nfs_notify_retry_time to nfs_smnotify_retry_time, bacase no retrytime option for rpc.statd.
> > The parameter nfs_notify_foreground can make the correct option for rpc.statd
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dejan
>
> > Best regards,
> > John
> >
>
>
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
>
>
Re: 答复: Re: 答复: Re: New patch for?resource-agents(nfsserver) [ In reply to ]
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:34:34PM -0700, John Shi wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> You take the action of checks on the place it should go, better!
> Thanks in advance!

Thanks for the review. Applied now.

Cheers,

Dejan

>
> Best regards,
> John
>
> >>> Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de> 2013-1-24 上午 0:17 >>>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:21:34PM -0700, John Shi wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> > Is this patch OK ? I didn't see the pache going upstream yet.
> > Thanks!
>
> Applied now. Can you please also test the attached patch. It is
> fairly small and low impact, but still.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dejan
>
> > Best regards,
> > John
> >
> > >>> Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de> 2012-12-24 下午 17:57 >>>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:18:41PM -0700, John Shi wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Fix all cause an error to call rpc.statd, including:
> > >
> > > Specify the value of nfs_notify_cmd should be either sm-notify or rpc.statd in meta_data.
> > > Rename the parameter nfs_notify_retry_time to nfs_smnotify_retry_time, bacase no retrytime option for rpc.statd.
> > > The parameter nfs_notify_foreground can make the correct option for rpc.statd
> >
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dejan
> >
> > > Best regards,
> > > John
> > >
> >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________________
> > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/