Mailing List Archive

Hi Dejan

Thank you for a reply.
JAVA_HOME is necessary by all means to start JBoss.
I did not understand a method to hand an environment variable from the outside.
Therefore I deleted change and JAVA_HOME to a required parameter.

Regards,
Tomo

2011/11/14 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 06:08:53PM +0900, nozawat wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>  It is not usually possible that an environment variable passes.
>>  Therefore I revised java_home in a required parameter.
>
> Sorry, we cannot do this. It will break existing installations.
> Why would you need this parameter to be required?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dejan
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Tomo
>
>
>> _______________________________________________________
>> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Hi,

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:03:40PM +0900, nozawat wrote:
> Hi Dejan
>
> Thank you for a reply.
> JAVA_HOME is necessary by all means to start JBoss.
> I did not understand a method to hand an environment variable from the outside.

Certainly there is a way to set a system wide environment
variable. Perhaps it depends on the distribution.

> Therefore I deleted change and JAVA_HOME to a required parameter.

But what's the point? The RA allows java_home to be set, so you
can do that. If somebody else has an environment already set
which includes JAVA_HOME, then they can skip setting this
parameter. Where do you see a problem?

Thanks,

Dejan

> Regards,
> Tomo
>
> 2011/11/14 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 06:08:53PM +0900, nozawat wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >>  It is not usually possible that an environment variable passes.
> >>  Therefore I revised java_home in a required parameter.
> >
> > Sorry, we cannot do this. It will break existing installations.
> > Why would you need this parameter to be required?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dejan
> >
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Tomo
> >
> >
> >> _______________________________________________________
> >> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Hi Dejan

> Certainly there is a way to set a system wide environment
> variable. Perhaps it depends on the distribution.
OK. Then it is deleted JAVA_HOME It is surely bad to do.

> But what's the point? The RA allows java_home to be set, so you
> can do that. If somebody else has an environment already set
> which includes JAVA_HOME, then they can skip setting this
> parameter. Where do you see a problem?
I thought that JAVA_HOME was not set. Therefore I set required=1.

In java_home, the problem does not occur because I can set it.
However, I thought that I should set required=1 if JAVA_HOME was not set.

Please destroy this patch.

Regards,
Tomo

2011/11/14 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejanmm@fastmail.fm>:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:03:40PM +0900, nozawat wrote:
>> Hi Dejan
>>
>>  Thank you for a reply.
>>  JAVA_HOME is necessary by all means to start JBoss.
>>  I did not understand a method to hand an environment variable from the outside.
>
> Certainly there is a way to set a system wide environment
> variable. Perhaps it depends on the distribution.
>
>>  Therefore I deleted change and JAVA_HOME to a required parameter.
>
> But what's the point? The RA allows java_home to be set, so you
> can do that. If somebody else has an environment already set
> which includes JAVA_HOME, then they can skip setting this
> parameter. Where do you see a problem?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dejan
>
>> Regards,
>> Tomo
>>
>> 2011/11/14 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 06:08:53PM +0900, nozawat wrote:
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >>  It is not usually possible that an environment variable passes.
>> >>  Therefore I revised java_home in a required parameter.
>> >
>> > Sorry, we cannot do this. It will break existing installations.
>> > Why would you need this parameter to be required?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Dejan
>> >
>> >
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Tomo
>> >
>> >
>> >> _______________________________________________________
>> >> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
>> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>> >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________
>> > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
>> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>> >
>> _______________________________________________________
>> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:30:43AM +0900, nozawat wrote:
> Hi Dejan
>
> > Certainly there is a way to set a system wide environment
> > variable. Perhaps it depends on the distribution.
> OK. Then it is deleted JAVA_HOME It is surely bad to do.
>
> > But what's the point? The RA allows java_home to be set, so you
> > can do that. If somebody else has an environment already set
> > which includes JAVA_HOME, then they can skip setting this
> > parameter. Where do you see a problem?
> I thought that JAVA_HOME was not set. Therefore I set required=1.
>
> In java_home, the problem does not occur because I can set it.
> However, I thought that I should set required=1 if JAVA_HOME was not set.
>
> Please destroy this patch.

OK.

Thanks,

Dejan

> Regards,
> Tomo
>
> 2011/11/14 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejanmm@fastmail.fm>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:03:40PM +0900, nozawat wrote:
> >> Hi Dejan
> >>
> >>  Thank you for a reply.
> >>  JAVA_HOME is necessary by all means to start JBoss.
> >>  I did not understand a method to hand an environment variable from the outside.
> >
> > Certainly there is a way to set a system wide environment
> > variable. Perhaps it depends on the distribution.
> >
> >>  Therefore I deleted change and JAVA_HOME to a required parameter.
> >
> > But what's the point? The RA allows java_home to be set, so you
> > can do that. If somebody else has an environment already set
> > which includes JAVA_HOME, then they can skip setting this
> > parameter. Where do you see a problem?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dejan
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Tomo
> >>
> >> 2011/11/14 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de>:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 06:08:53PM +0900, nozawat wrote:
> >> >> Hi
> >> >>
> >> >>  It is not usually possible that an environment variable passes.
> >> >>  Therefore I revised java_home in a required parameter.
> >> >
> >> > Sorry, we cannot do this. It will break existing installations.
> >> > Why would you need this parameter to be required?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Dejan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Regards,
> >> >> Tomo
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> _______________________________________________________
> >> >> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> >> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >> >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________________
> >> > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> >> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________________
> >> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/