Mailing List Archive

[PATCH] FS: add_partition silently ignored errors
(since there was no more discussion, here's the last version that includes
the requested change to not fail if the partition is larger than the disk)

add_partition silently ignored errors
this patch passes meaningful errorcodes back
and processes them in the calling functions

Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@linux.intel.com>
---
block/ioctl.c | 9 +++++++--
fs/partitions/check.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
include/linux/genhd.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
index 52d6385..662ec18 100644
--- a/block/ioctl.c
+++ b/block/ioctl.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static int blkpg_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, struct blkpg_ioctl_arg __user
struct blkpg_partition p;
long long start, length;
int part;
- int i;
+ int i, err;

if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EACCES;
@@ -61,7 +61,12 @@ static int blkpg_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, struct blkpg_ioctl_arg __user
}
}
/* all seems OK */
- add_partition(disk, part, start, length, ADDPART_FLAG_NONE);
+ err = add_partition(disk, part, start, length,
+ ADDPART_FLAG_NONE)
+ if (err) {
+ mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+ return err;
+ }
mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
return 0;
case BLKPG_DEL_PARTITION:
diff --git a/fs/partitions/check.c b/fs/partitions/check.c
index 722e12e..f802b32 100644
--- a/fs/partitions/check.c
+++ b/fs/partitions/check.c
@@ -368,13 +368,14 @@ void delete_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int part)
kobject_put(&p->kobj);
}

-void add_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int part, sector_t start, sector_t len, int flags)
+int add_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int part, sector_t start, sector_t len, int flags)
{
struct hd_struct *p;
+ int err = 0;

p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!p)
- return;
+ return -ENOMEM;

p->start_sect = start;
p->nr_sects = len;
@@ -390,20 +391,38 @@ void add_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int part, sector_t start, sector_t len,
p->kobj.parent = &disk->kobj;
p->kobj.ktype = &ktype_part;
kobject_init(&p->kobj);
- kobject_add(&p->kobj);
+ err = kobject_add(&p->kobj);
+ if (err)
+ goto out_put;
if (!disk->part_uevent_suppress)
kobject_uevent(&p->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
- sysfs_create_link(&p->kobj, &block_subsys.kobj, "subsystem");
+ err = sysfs_create_link(&p->kobj, &block_subsys.kobj, "subsystem");
+ if (err)
+ goto out_cleanup;
if (flags & ADDPART_FLAG_WHOLEDISK) {
static struct attribute addpartattr = {
.name = "whole_disk",
.mode = S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH,
};

- sysfs_create_file(&p->kobj, &addpartattr);
+ err = sysfs_create_file(&p->kobj, &addpartattr);
+ if (err) {
+ sysfs_remove_link(&p->kobj, "subsystem");
+ goto out_cleanup;
+ }
}
partition_sysfs_add_subdir(p);
disk->part[part-1] = p;
+
+ return 0;
+
+out_cleanup:
+ if (!disk->part_uevent_suppress)
+ kobject_uevent(&p->kobj, KOBJ_REMOVE);
+ kobject_del(&p->kobj);
+out_put:
+ kobject_put(&p->kobj);
+ return err;
}

static char *make_block_name(struct gendisk *disk)
@@ -530,7 +549,7 @@ exit:
int rescan_partitions(struct gendisk *disk, struct block_device *bdev)
{
struct parsed_partitions *state;
- int p, res;
+ int p, res, err;

if (bdev->bd_part_count)
return -EBUSY;
@@ -555,7 +574,9 @@ int rescan_partitions(struct gendisk *disk, struct block_device *bdev)
printk(" %s: p%d exceeds device capacity\n",
disk->disk_name, p);
}
- add_partition(disk, p, from, size, state->parts[p].flags);
+ err = add_partition(disk, p, from, size, state->parts[p].flags);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD
if (state->parts[p].flags & ADDPART_FLAG_RAID)
md_autodetect_dev(bdev->bd_dev+p);
diff --git a/include/linux/genhd.h b/include/linux/genhd.h
index a47b802..ae6af2c 100644
--- a/include/linux/genhd.h
+++ b/include/linux/genhd.h
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ struct unixware_disklabel {
char *disk_name (struct gendisk *hd, int part, char *buf);

extern int rescan_partitions(struct gendisk *disk, struct block_device *bdev);
-extern void add_partition(struct gendisk *, int, sector_t, sector_t, int);
+extern int add_partition(struct gendisk *, int, sector_t, sector_t, int);
extern void delete_partition(struct gendisk *, int);
extern void printk_all_partitions(void);

--
gitgui.0.8.4.g8d863

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] FS: add_partition silently ignored errors [ In reply to ]
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> (since there was no more discussion, here's the last version that includes
> the requested change to not fail if the partition is larger than the disk)

I'd suggest keeping it in -mm for a while.

I worry about these kinds of "trivial" changes. Quite often, some errors
may be normal, and breaking out early can sometimes hurt more than it
helps, in that it just makes things not even limp along. That said, with
the disk/partition size check removed, this looks more palatable.

> - add_partition(disk, part, start, length, ADDPART_FLAG_NONE);
> + err = add_partition(disk, part, start, length,
> + ADDPART_FLAG_NONE)
> + if (err) {
> + mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> + return err;
> + }
> mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> return 0;

However, this is just ugly. The thing is not only apparently totally
untested, since it is missing a semicolon, it should also just read

err = add_partition(disk, part, start, length, ADDPART_FLAG_NONE);
mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
return err;

without any unnecessary conditionals (or ugly line-breaks, for that
matter).

> - sysfs_create_file(&p->kobj, &addpartattr);
> + err = sysfs_create_file(&p->kobj, &addpartattr);
> + if (err) {
> + sysfs_remove_link(&p->kobj, "subsystem");
> + goto out_cleanup;

Wouldn't this be better done as

if (err)
goto out_unlink_cleanup;

to match the rest of the error handling?

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/