Mailing List Archive

rule limitations?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

For relatively obscure reasons, I am trying to build a set of rules that run into the hundreds of thousands. I was experimenting on a Redhat Release 5 machine with 2.6.18 kernel and 1.3.5 iptables. I was able to load around 340k rules before getting an error of iptables-restore: line XXXXXX failed.

So I try it out on a server (much beefier, 8G ram, dual quad core 2GHz proc) running the same kernel/iptables versions. This time it died in the same way at about 40k rules. After some research I found a log message on Vmalloc failures, so I figured what the hell and rebuilt the server using the 64 bit version of RH 5. Now no more vmalloc failures, but still dies at around 40k entries.

I am more than happy to build a custom kernel if that what I need to do. I have poked around the sources and it is not obvious what needs to change.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks!

- - ---> Phil
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFGwO22a2RfHGe2XK4RAieYAJ4zyhQ9TZVfCmVIn6PQYzXP5SsSPgCfRmxW
AoW2WX8lau75nY7WzGnPpjA=
=BM8m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: rule limitations? [ In reply to ]
Nesser, Phil wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> For relatively obscure reasons, I am trying to build a set of rules that run into the hundreds of thousands. I was experimenting on a Redhat Release 5 machine with 2.6.18 kernel and 1.3.5 iptables. I was able to load around 340k rules before getting an error of iptables-restore: line XXXXXX failed.
>
> So I try it out on a server (much beefier, 8G ram, dual quad core 2GHz proc) running the same kernel/iptables versions. This time it died in the same way at about 40k rules. After some research I found a log message on Vmalloc failures, so I figured what the hell and rebuilt the server using the 64 bit version of RH 5. Now no more vmalloc failures, but still dies at around 40k entries.
>
> I am more than happy to build a custom kernel if that what I need to do. I have poked around the sources and it is not obvious what needs to change.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.


What error message do you get (or if its too unspecific, what does
strace show)?
Re: rule limitations? [ In reply to ]
> Nesser, Phil wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> For relatively obscure reasons, I am trying to build a set of rules that
>> run into the hundreds of thousands. I was experimenting on a Redhat
>> Release 5 machine with 2.6.18 kernel and 1.3.5 iptables. I was able to
>> load around 340k rules before getting an error of iptables-restore: line
>> XXXXXX failed.
>>
>> So I try it out on a server (much beefier, 8G ram, dual quad core 2GHz
>> proc) running the same kernel/iptables versions. This time it died in
>> the same way at about 40k rules. After some research I found a log
>> message on Vmalloc failures, so I figured what the hell and rebuilt the
>> server using the 64 bit version of RH 5. Now no more vmalloc failures,
>> but still dies at around 40k entries.
>>
>> I am more than happy to build a custom kernel if that what I need to do.
>> I have poked around the sources and it is not obvious what needs to
>> change.
>>
>> Any help would be appreciated.

You are limited by vmalloc space.

See, my previous explaination:
http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2006-October/025879.html

Hilsen
Jesper Brouer

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MSc. Master of Computer Science
Dept. of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen
Author of http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk
-------------------------------------------------------------------