Mailing List Archive

[PATCH] Multiple range support for BALANCE
Hi,

Now I've added multiple range support to BALANCE too. It's a simple port
of the multiple range support in SAME.

I had the same problem here with one variable in my struct containing the
value of a previously used struct. it's mr->ipnum in balance_check that's
misbehaving according to me. Well I reset it to 0 and everything seems to
be working fine now.

I don't know if anyone's ever asked for support for multiple ranges in
BALANCE but since it was an easy port from SAME (they are _very_ alike)
I thought that I'd let the Core-team descide if this is something that's
needed.

/Martin

--
Linux hackers are funny people: They count the time in patchlevels.
Re: [PATCH] Multiple range support for BALANCE [ In reply to ]
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 07:11:13PM +0200, Martin Josefsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if anyone's ever asked for support for multiple ranges in
> BALANCE but since it was an easy port from SAME (they are _very_ alike)
> I thought that I'd let the Core-team descide if this is something that's
> needed.

Just to give you an intermediate update.

A decision will be made in a couple of days.


> /Martin

--
Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte / laforge@gnumonks.org http://www.gnumonks.org
============================================================================
GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M-
V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t++ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ DI? !D G+ e* h+ r% y+(*)