I've had this thought wandering through my head for a while, and have been
wondering this question:
Has anybody considered putting the core functionality of gpg into a library,
and then writing a comparatively small wrapper around for the command line
interface?
This would allow individual interfaces and uses of gpg to spring up MUCH more
easily, as it would then be much easier to find the code you want, the options
you want, etc.
I've considered undertaking such a task, but don't know how well received it
would be.
--
Michael J. Pedersen
My GnuPG KeyID: 4E724A60 My Public Key Available At: wwwkeys.pgp.net
My GnuPG Key Fingerprint: C31C 7E90 5992 9E5E 9A02 233D D8DD 985E 4E72 4A60
GnuPG available at http://www.gnupg.org
wondering this question:
Has anybody considered putting the core functionality of gpg into a library,
and then writing a comparatively small wrapper around for the command line
interface?
This would allow individual interfaces and uses of gpg to spring up MUCH more
easily, as it would then be much easier to find the code you want, the options
you want, etc.
I've considered undertaking such a task, but don't know how well received it
would be.
--
Michael J. Pedersen
My GnuPG KeyID: 4E724A60 My Public Key Available At: wwwkeys.pgp.net
My GnuPG Key Fingerprint: C31C 7E90 5992 9E5E 9A02 233D D8DD 985E 4E72 4A60
GnuPG available at http://www.gnupg.org