Mailing List Archive: Portuguese po translation

Hi all. Happy Halloween!

I am doing the translation of GnuPG into European Portuguese.

I have some questions:

1. There are a lot of branches version. The GnuPG of my package manager
is following the 2.2.x version's. But the current version on gnupg.org
is 2.4.x . There are also 2.5-base and 2.6-base. My question is: which
git branch should I use for my translation?

2. When done, to where do I send the git patch?

3. Last time I sent a git patch to an address, my email provider blocked
me sending the email, because my email provider flagged it as suspicious
of being SPAM. I probably will have to send the patch on a tar archive,
or send the patch as an OpenPGP encrypted email. Is this ok? Which of
the two options is best? (first, I will try to send it unencrypted)

Hope you are all good and are safe. Thank you for making GnuPG.

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-devel mailing list
Gnupg-devel@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel

Hi!

> 1. There are a lot of branches version. The GnuPG of my package manager
> is following the 2.2.x version's. But the current version on gnupg.org
> is 2.4.x . There are also 2.5-base and 2.6-base. My question is: which
> git branch should I use for my translation?

The stable branch is 2.4 - please translate only this branch. Don't
case about the base tags - they are only used for our automatic version
numering method. GnuPG 2.6 will take another year before we can do a
release and then it will likely first be a 2.5 release for early
adopters.

> 2. When done, to where do I send the git patch?

translations@gnupg.org is a good address.

> 3. Last time I sent a git patch to an address, my email provider blocked
> me sending the email, because my email provider flagged it as suspicious
> of being SPAM. I probably will have to send the patch on a tar archive,

This summer we had a massive backscatter attack on our server.
Meanwhile we migrated to a new server and also use BATS. So all things
should be fine now.

> or send the patch as an OpenPGP encrypted email. Is this ok? Which of
> the two options is best? (first, I will try to send it unencrypted)

Signed commint would be the proofread thinsg but a signed mail is also
okay.

Thanks for helping with translations.

Salam-Shalom,

Werner

--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein

Mailing List Archive

Mailing List Archive

Attached Files: