Mailing List Archive: Re: Id 10 for Twofish

Re: Id 10 for Twofish

Jan 29, 1999, 4:50 PM

Post #1 of 3 (162 views)

On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Werner Koch wrote:
> 1) Did we agree on using the algorithm id 10 for Twofish? And
> can I create preference lists with 10 in it.
>
> 2) What is the conclusion about the keysize: 128, 196 or 256 bit.

I believe our conjecture was
id: 10, keysize: 256

Sorry about the cross-post, but it is valuable for both lists.
Max <maxinux@openpgp.net> New PGP Keys Available
If crypto is outlawed only outlaws will have crypto.
1960 Ford Falcon Tudor Daily Driver, Dont you just wish you had one?

Re: Id 10 for Twofish [ In reply to ]

jon at pgp

Feb 1, 1999, 6:15 PM

Post #2 of 3 (165 views)

Permalink

At 03:50 PM 1/29/99 -0800, Max Inux wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Werner Koch wrote:
> 1) Did we agree on using the algorithm id 10 for Twofish? And
> can I create preference lists with 10 in it.
>
> 2) What is the conclusion about the keysize: 128, 196 or 256 bit.

I believe our conjecture was
id: 10, keysize: 256

My belief concurs with Max.

Jon

-----
Jon Callas jon@pgp.com
CTO, Total Network Security 3965 Freedom Circle
Network Associates, Inc. Santa Clara, CA 95054
(408) 346-5860
Fingerprints: D1EC 3C51 FCB1 67F8 4345 4A04 7DF9 C2E6 F129 27A9 (DSS)
665B 797F 37D1 C240 53AC 6D87 3A60 4628 (RSA)

Re: Id 10 for Twofish [ In reply to ]

wk at isil

Feb 1, 1999, 10:57 PM

Post #3 of 3 (162 views)

Permalink

Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com> writes:

> I believe our conjecture was
> id: 10, keysize: 256
>
> My belief concurs with Max.

Okay.

Werner