Mailing List Archive

1 2  View All
Re: [RFC] qmail.eclass draft [ In reply to ]
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> Yep. Maybe it is also a good idea to make a stand-alone ebuild for the
> qmail-spp plugins in the tarball i have collected, cleaned up and
> tested so far, so we do not need to handle that in the qmail ebuilds..?

That's a great idea. However, can control/smtpplugins take absolute
paths? Otherwise we'd still have to symlink them into
/var/qmail*/plugins.

Greets,
Michael

--
http://hansmi.ch/
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [RFC] qmail.eclass draft [ In reply to ]
>> - If I remember correctly, elog shouldn't be used for empty lines like
>> in qmail_supervise_config_notice. Use echo instead for them.
>
> You remember incorrectly (though I don't think I ever said anything
> about it). You should use elog/ewarn/... without arguments to separate
> different message items (with echo it might look better on the console
> during the build, but worse in the final log).
>
Is there anything technically wrong with

elog 'message A

message B'

..which is how we'd do a multi-line echo in bash? (I don't know how it
interacts with the log.)


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

1 2  View All