On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> Yep. Maybe it is also a good idea to make a stand-alone ebuild for the
> qmail-spp plugins in the tarball i have collected, cleaned up and
> tested so far, so we do not need to handle that in the qmail ebuilds..?
That's a great idea. However, can control/smtpplugins take absolute
paths? Otherwise we'd still have to symlink them into
/var/qmail*/plugins.
Greets,
Michael
--
http://hansmi.ch/
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> Yep. Maybe it is also a good idea to make a stand-alone ebuild for the
> qmail-spp plugins in the tarball i have collected, cleaned up and
> tested so far, so we do not need to handle that in the qmail ebuilds..?
That's a great idea. However, can control/smtpplugins take absolute
paths? Otherwise we'd still have to symlink them into
/var/qmail*/plugins.
Greets,
Michael
--
http://hansmi.ch/
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list