Mailing List Archive

[PATCH 3/3] Summary for 20231210 meeting.
License: CC-BY-SA-4.0
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
---
meeting-logs/20231210-summary.txt | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
meeting-logs/20231210-summary.txt.asc | 10 ++++
2 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meeting-logs/20231210-summary.txt
create mode 100644 meeting-logs/20231210-summary.txt.asc

diff --git a/meeting-logs/20231210-summary.txt b/meeting-logs/20231210-summary.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c1dca69
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meeting-logs/20231210-summary.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+Summary of Gentoo council meeting 10 December 2023
+
+Agenda
+======
+
+1. Roll call
+2. Foundation dissolution status update
+3. Clarification of allarches stabilization policy
+4. GLEP84 acceptance
+5. Open bugs with council participation
+6. Arch status review
+7. Open floor
+
+Roll Call
+=========
+
+Present: ajak, dilfridge, mattst88, mgorny (late), sam, soap, ulm
+
+Foundation dissolution status update
+====================================
+mattst88 emailed the X.Org Board of Directors to ask for their experience with
+SPI in November and pinged them again on December 5. He asked in their IRC
+channel (#xf-bod on OFTC) as well on Dec 9. No response at the time of the
+Council meeting [*]
+
+[*] We received a reply via email on Dec 12 from X.Org Board Member Ricardo
+Garcia:
+
+> Regarding your questions, it's my understanding SPI are sometimes slow to
+> reply to some questions and required actions, and the X.Org Foundation is
+> now in the process of moving to SFC hoping that some of those problems are
+> solved.
+>
+> The experience of joining an umbrella organization is generally good (but
+> other board members with more experience should chime in on this), in the
+> sense that it removes a fair amount of work from the treasurer and other
+> board members.
+
+Clarification of allarches stabilization policy
+===============================================
+ulm asks for a clarification of the allarches stabilization policy:
+
+> I'd like the council to clarify the allarches stabilisation policy.
+> In particular, can we allow self-stabilisation by maintainers for
+> allarches packages, if the requirements for testing the package are
+> fulfilled on at least one arch (e.g. stable system or stable chroot).
+
+Council agrees.
+
+GLEP84 approval
+===============
+Motion: Accept GLEP 84 (https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0084.html)
+Accepted 6-0
+
+Open bugs with council involvement
+==================================
+None.
+
+Arch status review
+==================
+No changes required at this time.
+
+Some discussion of ia64 support being dropped from core upstream projects.
+Likely means the end of the ia64 Gentoo port in the near future.
+
+Open floor
+==========
+Gentoo was not granted a booth for FOSDEM 2024. dilfridge has emailed the
+organizers in the hopes of changing this.
+
+This work is licensed under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License.
diff --git a/meeting-logs/20231210-summary.txt.asc b/meeting-logs/20231210-summary.txt.asc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9b501ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meeting-logs/20231210-summary.txt.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+Version: GnuPG v2
+
+iOoEABYKAJIWIQReryEEmoa4pUzLG/qs6yl0DJpOlwUCZaAmcV8UgAAAAAAuAChp
+c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0NUVB
+RjIxMDQ5QTg2QjhBNTRDQ0IxQkZBQUNFQjI5NzQwQzlBNEU5NxQcbWF0dHN0ODhA
+Z2VudG9vLm9yZwAKCRCs6yl0DJpOl8fVAP4mHzGl/l59I6Gl2smRtoGi/cL71L+E
+I6W3MiHEzolEawEA2PM0v2dAPcVHQ3PM1qItBn/Tp15h3EcMqpIPBVljuAk=
+=3MPH
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
2.43.0