Mailing List Archive

Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: www-plugins/gnash
On 09/05/2009 01:24 AM, Robert Bradbury wrote:
> I've used the gnash plugin because earlier Flash releases were so
> "problematic" (crashing Flash would generally crash Firefox). But
> generally migrated away from Flash as it seemed to become more and
> more of an advertising distribution medium that one had no user
> control over (this is a subjective impression). Gnash also seemed to
> be unable to play more recent versions of Flash files.
>
> Is gnash still under development (as an open source alternative to
> Adobe flash)? If so, then it would seem to make sense to keep the
> plugin alive. Where does this all go with the evolution towards more
> open media formats (HTML 3.x?). It is my impression currently that a
> consensus could not be agreed upon for a "standard" open
> non-proprietary format for audio/video files.

Flash *is* an open format; Adobe opened up its specs a while ago. It's
just that the only full implementation of it isn't open (Adobe Flash).
Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: www-plugins/gnash [ In reply to ]
Nikos Chantziaras posted on Sat, 05 Sep 2009 02:19:12 +0300 as excerpted:

> On 09/05/2009 01:24 AM, Robert Bradbury wrote:
>>
>> Is gnash still under development (as an open source alternative to
>> Adobe flash)?

TTBOMK [1], gnash is now a GNU sponsored project, one I believe they are
actually paying someone to spend some time on, now, after a free flash
alternative came up near the top of the priority list on a user poll they
did about three years ago. <a quick ggl:gnash later> Yes, gnash is a GNU
project, at least, tho I'm not sure on the paid developer status. The
latest release was 0.8.5_beta4, on March 3, this year:

http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/

>> If so, then it would seem to make sense to keep the
>> plugin alive. Where does this all go with the evolution towards more
>> open media formats (HTML 3.x?). It is my impression currently that a
>> consensus could not be agreed upon for a "standard" open
>> non-proprietary format for audio/video files.

HTML 5.0, and you're impression is reasonably correct. Based on what
I've read, they settled on <audio> and <video> tags, but could not come
to agreement on specific codecs, because the FLOSS folks couldn't accept
a proprietary (patented) codec, and some of the others couldn't/wouldn't
accept the current state of open codecs, at least for video (audio I
believe they agreed on ogg-vorbis, but check before you rely on that). I
believe Nokia was on the proprietary side as they already had a license
for <whatever>, and theora wasn't in a state that would work well on
their cellphones and the like.

But that's changing, and a further HTML 5.1 version may well have a free
video codec as well. Combine that with some of the stuff that's already
possible in draft-5.0, and Flash may have a tough fight on its hands. Of
course, there's Microsoft Silverlight to worry about too...

> Flash *is* an open format; Adobe opened up its specs a while ago. It's
> just that the only full implementation of it isn't open (Adobe Flash).

AFAIK, the issue isn't the "openness" of the format, you're absolutely
correct on that, but the fact that some of the most effective and popular
flash related codecs have serious software patent issues, at least in
areas of the world where such things unfortunately exist.

The other factor is that while it's open, Adobe controls the spec I
believe, and thus can continue to develop their closed version and not
release the updated spec until they release their updated player at the
same time (if they choose to update the spec at all, they can just let it
fall behind if the chose, too), so open implementations will by
definition remain 1-2 versions behind, because by the time they get to a
particular spot, Adobe will have likely released a new version and a new
spec to go with it.

.....

[1] TTBOMK: To the best of my knowledge. emerge wtf and query it on the
command line as wtf ttbomk, if you need a cheat sheet for this sort of
thing, or look it up on onelook.com, FWIW, I have onelook setup as the
ol: kde web shortcut here, plus wtf. =:^)

--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: www-plugins/gnash [ In reply to ]
Le 05/09/2009 11:25, Duncan a écrit :
[...]

This is off-topic for gentoo-dev. Please continue this discussion in
private.

Thanks

Rémi