Mailing List Archive

Re: anonymous doesn't want to be rm-d by Phrack High Council
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Kids??
Maybe some of us are older sociologists that see the role INFOSUCK will play in the near police state FEMA, TIPS, and big info-br0tha have in store for us that ARE in the u.S. ( see 1938 germany prior to national socialist regime - history is our teacher and she pulls no punches if we are honest with her)
Maybe they are the careful cultivation of a memetic experiment that is finally coming to fruit. We are agent and agency. Perhaps this post was yet another slight of hand to throw the masses collective eyesight in the proper direction for optimal fecundity and longevity.
Your kung fu is no good! You, anonymous dropper of docs are hypocricy personified by your post alone. You criticize with mean and biting tongue the "illegal" activities these "children" allegedly take part in, but I suspect you yourself may have become a victim of your own ineptitude, and as a last ditch effort to save face, drop identification documents on these "minors", therefore, willfully taking part in illegally endagering the welfare of a child - a blackhat activity if I EVER saw one. memetic experiment is an obvious success. You have absorbed us and our instruction set whether you like it or not. we are one.

We refer to all signifiers, all that is signified, and the resultant significance on both global

and local scales.

( You tell me who won? I see them.....They run)

We refer to that which we contain, and that in which we are contained;

We refer now to you.

When you have finished reading the remaining nineteen words, this
process of irreversible infection will be completed, and you will
depart, believing yourself largely unaffected by this process.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Hush 2.1
Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com

wmUEARECACUFAj1ZoloeHG1lbWV0aWMtZW5naW5lZXJAaHVzaG1haWwuY29tAAoJEIHY
1pE2l0bf9BYAn364FZfU+G6U56NoMgIaQNkwxeWvAJ4yQ510qQmwV9h/133UYbdm7VQp
uQ==
=BpOn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Communicate in total privacy.
Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2

Looking for a good deal on a domain name? http://www.hush.com/partners/offers.cgi?id=domainpeople
RE: Re: anonymous doesn't want to be rm-d by Phrack High Council [ In reply to ]
I'm kind of wondering when this list evolved into alt.2600 or AHM. Haven't
we had enough yelling across the playground at each other folks? Can you
settle this outside by the swingset at 3:15? Just get it over with. Jeez..

Thx..

> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com]On Behalf Of
> memetic-engineer@hushmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 8:21 PM
> To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: anonymous doesn't want to be rm-d by
> Phrack High Council
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kids??
> Maybe some of us are older sociologists that see the role
> INFOSUCK will play in the near police state FEMA, TIPS, and big
> info-br0tha have in store for us that ARE in the u.S. ( see 1938
> germany prior to national socialist regime - history is our
> teacher and she pulls no punches if we are honest with her)
> Maybe they are the careful cultivation of a memetic experiment
> that is finally coming to fruit. We are agent and agency. Perhaps
> this post was yet another slight of hand to throw the masses
> collective eyesight in the proper direction for optimal fecundity
> and longevity.
> Your kung fu is no good! You, anonymous dropper of docs are
> hypocricy personified by your post alone. You criticize with mean
> and biting tongue the "illegal" activities these "children"
> allegedly take part in, but I suspect you yourself may have
> become a victim of your own ineptitude, and as a last ditch
> effort to save face, drop identification documents on these
> "minors", therefore, willfully taking part in illegally
> endagering the welfare of a child - a blackhat activity if I EVER
> saw one. memetic experiment is an obvious success. You have
> absorbed us and our instruction set whether you like it or not.
> we are one.
>
> We refer to all signifiers, all that is signified, and the
> resultant significance on both global
>
> and local scales.
>
> ( You tell me who won? I see them.....They run)
>
> We refer to that which we contain, and that in which we are contained;
>
> We refer now to you.
>
> When you have finished reading the remaining nineteen words, this
> process of irreversible infection will be completed, and you will
> depart, believing yourself largely unaffected by this process.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: Hush 2.1
> Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com
>
> wmUEARECACUFAj1ZoloeHG1lbWV0aWMtZW5naW5lZXJAaHVzaG1haWwuY29tAAoJEIHY
> 1pE2l0bf9BYAn364FZfU+G6U56NoMgIaQNkwxeWvAJ4yQ510qQmwV9h/133UYbdm7VQp
> uQ==
> =BpOn
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> Communicate in total privacy.
> Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2
>
> Looking for a good deal on a domain name?
http://www.hush.com/partners/offers.cgi?id=domainpeople

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
RE: Re: anonymous doesn't want to be rm-d by Phrack High Council [ In reply to ]
Maybe this is a deliberate DoS attempt against the list. After all, we
know there are folks who don't want their favorite exploits to be
patched...

I don't know if anything can be done to stop this without destroying the
intent of the list, but it would help if the rest of us would refrain
from responding to the drivel. Yes, that means me too. This is my last
post on the subject...

-----Original Message-----
From: Hardy, Nigel [mailto:nigel.hardy@e-peopleserve.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 5:36 AM
To: 'full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com'
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: anonymous doesn't want to be rm-d by
Phrack High Council

I must agree here, only signed up for the list yesterday and out of the
30
odd mails i have received, only a half dozen or so were of any technical
use. The rest were moans about html mail, apolgies for someone sending
mail
from someone elses machine (how many apologies??) and general shouts.
Can we stick to the topics covered by the list and not just use this
like
#scriptkiddies ?
I have tried to keep this short and not put too much strain on your
already
overflowing inboxes
cheers for listening, this was a public service announcement !