------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467
Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@lysator.liu.se> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|peter@bowyer.org |tom@duncanthrax.net
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@lysator.liu.se> 2007-07-29 23:12:03 ---
See also http://bugs.debian.org/431239.
Isn't it sufficient to abstain from calling SPF_request_set_env_from() when
spf_envelope_sender is the null string? It looks that way to me, but I haven't
got around to testing yet.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
You are the QA contact for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467
Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@lysator.liu.se> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|peter@bowyer.org |tom@duncanthrax.net
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@lysator.liu.se> 2007-07-29 23:12:03 ---
See also http://bugs.debian.org/431239.
Isn't it sufficient to abstain from calling SPF_request_set_env_from() when
spf_envelope_sender is the null string? It looks that way to me, but I haven't
got around to testing yet.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##