Ethereal is decoding the data correctly. There really are 6 00's in the
data. On what OS did you
capture this packet?
--gilbert
Shawn Starr <spstarr@visualnet.rootpass.net> on 10/10/2000 06:39:19 PM
To: Gilbert Ramirez/Tivoli Systems@Tivoli Systems
cc:
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] ARP decoding problems
Yes here's one packet.
I dont know if its the capturing or decoding but a network engineer of
mine said thats not right.
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 Gilbert_Ramirez@tivoli.com wrote:
> Can you provide a sample trace file?
>
> --gilbert
>
> Shawn Starr <spstarr@visualnet.rootpass.net> on 10/10/2000 07:13:32 AM
>
> To: ethereal-users@ethereal.com
> cc: (bcc: Gilbert Ramirez/Tivoli Systems)
> Subject: [Ethereal-users] ARP decoding problems
>
>
>
>
> libpcap: 0.4
> libz: 1.1.3
> UCD SNMP 4.1.2
> Ethereal: 0.8.12
>
> Line: 0020: on the decoding of arps shows incorrect information
> Target hardware address: 00:00:00:00:00
>
> is always 12 0's?
>
> Isn't this supposed to be the destination of the MAC address of machine
> its trying to reach?
>
> im confused on this
>
> I have attach 2 PNG images comparing this with another scanner and they
> look very different on the decoding.
>
> Shawn.
>
>
data. On what OS did you
capture this packet?
--gilbert
Shawn Starr <spstarr@visualnet.rootpass.net> on 10/10/2000 06:39:19 PM
To: Gilbert Ramirez/Tivoli Systems@Tivoli Systems
cc:
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] ARP decoding problems
Yes here's one packet.
I dont know if its the capturing or decoding but a network engineer of
mine said thats not right.
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 Gilbert_Ramirez@tivoli.com wrote:
> Can you provide a sample trace file?
>
> --gilbert
>
> Shawn Starr <spstarr@visualnet.rootpass.net> on 10/10/2000 07:13:32 AM
>
> To: ethereal-users@ethereal.com
> cc: (bcc: Gilbert Ramirez/Tivoli Systems)
> Subject: [Ethereal-users] ARP decoding problems
>
>
>
>
> libpcap: 0.4
> libz: 1.1.3
> UCD SNMP 4.1.2
> Ethereal: 0.8.12
>
> Line: 0020: on the decoding of arps shows incorrect information
> Target hardware address: 00:00:00:00:00
>
> is always 12 0's?
>
> Isn't this supposed to be the destination of the MAC address of machine
> its trying to reach?
>
> im confused on this
>
> I have attach 2 PNG images comparing this with another scanner and they
> look very different on the decoding.
>
> Shawn.
>
>