Yes, changes will need to be made to Conserver. I recoomend getting a
Terminal Server that does not send a break rather than using one that does.
Many models support that feature.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ernie Oporto [mailto:Ernie.Oporto@viragelogic.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:33 AM
To: users@conserver.com
Subject: RE: Sun alternate break
What I meant was, does applying that patch require anything special to be
done to conserver, or does the Solaris kernel for that client understand the
break from conserver and interpret it correctly? I didn't want to patch
conserver so that all machines it manages now have to make use of that
alternate break. Only one machine might be set up like that, so that
machine should still be "breakable", just not from those inadvertent
disconnects.
Ernie
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Fowler [mailto:ChrisF@computone.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:32 AM
To: 'Ernie Oporto'; users@conserver.com
Subject: RE: Sun alternate break
Yes,
You need a patch and you must hae a sun support agreement to receive that
patch. Call SunSolve and they'll give it to you.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Ernie Oporto [ mailto:Ernie.Oporto@viragelogic.com
<mailto:Ernie.Oporto@viragelogic.com> ]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:05 AM
To: users@conserver.com
Subject: Sun alternate break
Is there a way to set a flag for Sun machines individually that have had
this change made to them...
http://sunsolve.sun.com/private-cgi/retrieve.pl?type=0 <
http://sunsolve.sun.com/private-cgi/retrieve.pl?type=0&doc=srdb%2F20427&dis p> &doc=srdb%2F20427&disp
lay=plain
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@conserver.com
https://www.conserver.com/mailman/listinfo/users <
https://www.conserver.com/mailman/listinfo/users>