Mailing List Archive

I've set it up with one customer so far, we brought a partner in to help
with it, using a Ribbon SBC. The partner setup the ribbon, took very
little time and we can direct route to MS Teams.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:06 PM UC Penguin <gentoo@ucpenguin.com> wrote:

> Does anyone have an experience with setting up interop between
> CUCM/Microsoft Teams with Direct Routing?
>
> If so what (supported) SBC did you use and what if any issues did you
> encounter?
>
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

Hello,



I have done this with Sonus, now Ribbon. No real issues except the Sonus did not like getting the Diversion header from CUCM. This was with Skype for Business though, but might be the same.



Also, the Sonus Cloud Connector takes about two hours to install itself. There’s a lot of work it does automatically, and once it gets started it takes a while. I lost a lot of time when the customer didn’t have this predeployed.



Anyway, seems to be work fine. However, I wonder if it might be worth waiting for the new MS Teams interop on the horizon.



Thanks,



James

From: UC Penguin
Sent: 24 March 2020 22:07
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM Interop with MS Teams



Does anyone have an experience with setting up interop between CUCM/Microsoft Teams with Direct Routing?



If so what (supported) SBC did you use and what if any issues did you encounter?



Thanks!

_______________________________________________

cisco-voip mailing list

cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Cisco CUBE can be used for this as well.

Official documentation should be coming in the near future but you can do
it now with the right configuration.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:07 PM UC Penguin <gentoo@ucpenguin.com> wrote:

> Does anyone have an experience with setting up interop between
> CUCM/Microsoft Teams with Direct Routing?
>
> If so what (supported) SBC did you use and what if any issues did you
> encounter?
>
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

Yes. We are embarking on this adventure soon, using CUBE.

Loren

On Mar 24, 2020, at 6:28 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90@vt.edu> wrote:

?
Cisco CUBE can be used for this as well.

Official documentation should be coming in the near future but you can do it now with the right configuration.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:07 PM UC Penguin <gentoo@ucpenguin.com<mailto:gentoo@ucpenguin.com>> wrote:
Does anyone have an experience with setting up interop between CUCM/Microsoft Teams with Direct Routing?

If so what (supported) SBC did you use and what if any issues did you encounter?

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

I am looking at something similar. Have a whole mix of deskphones, jabber, cisco team, m/s teams, in the client’s environment. Just wondering how your landscape looks like and how well it works for calling between cisco-Microsoft and PSTN.

Do you have a mix of teams + Desk-phones + jabber at user end or purely MS Teams client and backend Cisco ?

Thanks



Thanks,
Terry
> On 25 Mar 2020, at 11:18 am, Loren Hillukka <lchillukka@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> ? Yes. We are embarking on this adventure soon, using CUBE.
>
> Loren
>
>>> On Mar 24, 2020, at 6:28 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90@vt.edu> wrote:
>>>
>> ?
>> Cisco CUBE can be used for this as well.
>>
>> Official documentation should be coming in the near future but you can do it now with the right configuration.
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:07 PM UC Penguin <gentoo@ucpenguin.com> wrote:
>>> Does anyone have an experience with setting up interop between CUCM/Microsoft Teams with Direct Routing?
>>>
>>> If so what (supported) SBC did you use and what if any issues did you encounter?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Brian,
would you care to comment "the right configuration" part of this ?
I've tried to setup it and failed misserably :(

TIA,
-Carlos

Brian Meade @ 24/03/2020 20:27 -0300 dixit:
> Cisco CUBE can be used for this as well.
>
> Official documentation should be coming in the near future but you can
> do it now with the right configuration.
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:07 PM UC Penguin <gentoo@ucpenguin.com
> <mailto:gentoo@ucpenguin.com>> wrote:
>
> Does anyone have an experience with setting up interop between
> CUCM/Microsoft Teams with Direct Routing?
>
> If so what (supported) SBC did you use and what if any issues did
> you encounter?
>
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

--
Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Terry, the voice part of MS teams is still being worked through to determine suitable sites/use cases for initial piloting and getting feet wet but we will have a similar mix of endpoints, and it will remain mixed for a long time I’d guess (we have UCCE in place). I won’t have many updates for the calling part til summer most likely with some of this work delayed due to current events. There are other companies out there with this kind of mix, not sure how many are on this list and want to give their experience.

Loren

On Mar 24, 2020, at 9:29 PM, Gr ccie <grccie@gmail.com> wrote:

? I am looking at something similar. Have a whole mix of deskphones, jabber, cisco team, m/s teams, in the client’s environment. Just wondering how your landscape looks like and how well it works for calling between cisco-Microsoft and PSTN.

Do you have a mix of teams + Desk-phones + jabber at user end or purely MS Teams client and backend Cisco ?

Thanks



Thanks,
Terry
On 25 Mar 2020, at 11:18 am, Loren Hillukka <lchillukka@hotmail.com> wrote:

? Yes. We are embarking on this adventure soon, using CUBE.

Loren

On Mar 24, 2020, at 6:28 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90@vt.edu> wrote:

?
Cisco CUBE can be used for this as well.

Official documentation should be coming in the near future but you can do it now with the right configuration.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:07 PM UC Penguin <gentoo@ucpenguin.com<mailto:gentoo@ucpenguin.com>> wrote:
Does anyone have an experience with setting up interop between CUCM/Microsoft Teams with Direct Routing?

If so what (supported) SBC did you use and what if any issues did you encounter?

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

I’ll be setting this it with a Ribbon SBC for a limited number of users that have SNR enabled currently to S4B.

Less than 10% of the users have this configuration and it’s not heavily used.

UCCE shop as well.

> On Apr 8, 2020, at 09:52, Loren Hillukka <lchillukka@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> ? Terry, the voice part of MS teams is still being worked through to determine suitable sites/use cases for initial piloting and getting feet wet but we will have a similar mix of endpoints, and it will remain mixed for a long time I’d guess (we have UCCE in place). I won’t have many updates for the calling part til summer most likely with some of this work delayed due to current events. There are other companies out there with this kind of mix, not sure how many are on this list and want to give their experience.
>
> Loren
>
>>> On Mar 24, 2020, at 9:29 PM, Gr ccie <grccie@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>> ? I am looking at something similar. Have a whole mix of deskphones, jabber, cisco team, m/s teams, in the client’s environment. Just wondering how your landscape looks like and how well it works for calling between cisco-Microsoft and PSTN.
>>
>> Do you have a mix of teams + Desk-phones + jabber at user end or purely MS Teams client and backend Cisco ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Terry
>>> On 25 Mar 2020, at 11:18 am, Loren Hillukka <lchillukka@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> ? Yes. We are embarking on this adventure soon, using CUBE.
>>>
>>> Loren
>>>
>>>> On Mar 24, 2020, at 6:28 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90@vt.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>> Cisco CUBE can be used for this as well.
>>>>
>>>> Official documentation should be coming in the near future but you can do it now with the right configuration.
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:07 PM UC Penguin <gentoo@ucpenguin.com> wrote:
>>>>> Does anyone have an experience with setting up interop between CUCM/Microsoft Teams with Direct Routing?
>>>>>
>>>>> If so what (supported) SBC did you use and what if any issues did you encounter?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

It should be pretty similar to most SIP CUBE configurations. The main
difference is you'll need to do Mutual TLS SIP with Microsoft so you'll
need a public certificate on the CUBE that the SIP-UA can use. You also
need a public IP on the CUBE and corresponding DNS records that Microsoft
side can reference.

I don't have a sanitized config I can share. How far have you gotten with
your configuration?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:25 AM Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@acm.org> wrote:

> Brian,
> would you care to comment "the right configuration" part of this ?
> I've tried to setup it and failed misserably :(
>
> TIA,
> -Carlos
>
> Brian Meade @ 24/03/2020 20:27 -0300 dixit:
> > Cisco CUBE can be used for this as well.
> >
> > Official documentation should be coming in the near future but you can
> > do it now with the right configuration.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:07 PM UC Penguin <gentoo@ucpenguin.com
> > <mailto:gentoo@ucpenguin.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone have an experience with setting up interop between
> > CUCM/Microsoft Teams with Direct Routing?
> >
> > If so what (supported) SBC did you use and what if any issues did
> > you encounter?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@acm.org>
>

Oh, I've got to the point that SIP options do flow, and even INVITEs but
blow up on answer. (i.e past the cert thingy)

Had to fix ips -> names via profiles, but was fighting with SRTP -> RTP
issues. TLS does make (for me) the troubleshooting more convoluted.

Would love to see a working config :) I was trying to have CUBE doing
CME too for a small office integration with Teams.

-Carlos


Brian Meade @ 08/04/2020 18:52 -0300 dixit:
> It should be pretty similar to most SIP CUBE configurations.  The main
> difference is you'll need to do Mutual TLS SIP with Microsoft so you'll
> need a public certificate on the CUBE that the SIP-UA can use.  You also
> need a public IP on the CUBE and corresponding DNS records that
> Microsoft side can reference.
>
> I don't have a sanitized config I can share.  How far have you gotten
> with your configuration?
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:25 AM Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@acm.org
> <mailto:tron@acm.org>> wrote:
>
> Brian,
> would you care to comment "the right configuration" part of this ?
> I've tried to setup it and failed misserably :(
>
> TIA,
> -Carlos
>
> Brian Meade @ 24/03/2020 20:27 -0300 dixit:
> > Cisco CUBE can be used for this as well.
> >
> > Official documentation should be coming in the near future but you can
> > do it now with the right configuration.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:07 PM UC Penguin <gentoo@ucpenguin.com
> <mailto:gentoo@ucpenguin.com>
> > <mailto:gentoo@ucpenguin.com <mailto:gentoo@ucpenguin.com>>> wrote:
> >
> >     Does anyone have an experience with setting up interop between
> >     CUCM/Microsoft Teams with Direct Routing?
> >
> >     If so what (supported) SBC did you use and what if any issues did
> >     you encounter?
> >
> >     Thanks!
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     cisco-voip mailing list
> >     cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
> >     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron@acm.org <mailto:tron@acm.org>>
>

--
Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

I’d like to see a working config as well


Kent

> On Apr 8, 2020, at 16:06, Carlos G Mendioroz via cisco-voip <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
> ?Oh, I've got to the point that SIP options do flow, and even INVITEs but
> blow up on answer. (i.e past the cert thingy)
>
> Had to fix ips -> names via profiles, but was fighting with SRTP -> RTP
> issues. TLS does make (for me) the troubleshooting more convoluted.
>
> Would love to see a working config :) I was trying to have CUBE doing
> CME too for a small office integration with Teams.
>
> -Carlos
>
>
> Brian Meade @ 08/04/2020 18:52 -0300 dixit:
>> It should be pretty similar to most SIP CUBE configurations. The main
>> difference is you'll need to do Mutual TLS SIP with Microsoft so you'll
>> need a public certificate on the CUBE that the SIP-UA can use. You also
>> need a public IP on the CUBE and corresponding DNS records that
>> Microsoft side can reference.
>>
>> I don't have a sanitized config I can share. How far have you gotten
>> with your configuration?
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:25 AM Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@acm.org
>> <mailto:tron@acm.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Brian,
>> would you care to comment "the right configuration" part of this ?
>> I've tried to setup it and failed misserably :(
>>
>> TIA,
>> -Carlos
>>
>> Brian Meade @ 24/03/2020 20:27 -0300 dixit:
>>> Cisco CUBE can be used for this as well.
>>>
>>> Official documentation should be coming in the near future but you can
>>> do it now with the right configuration.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:07 PM UC Penguin <gentoo@ucpenguin.com
>> <mailto:gentoo@ucpenguin.com>
>>> <mailto:gentoo@ucpenguin.com <mailto:gentoo@ucpenguin.com>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Does anyone have an experience with setting up interop between
>>> CUCM/Microsoft Teams with Direct Routing?
>>>
>>> If so what (supported) SBC did you use and what if any issues did
>>> you encounter?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
>> <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@acm.org <mailto:tron@acm.org>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Question for those that have this interop working. I want to forward calls to MS Teams directly to voicemail, without ringing the Teams client.

This appears to be possible from the MS docs as listed below. However they don’t provide an example SIP message for this.

I’ve tried adding this as an option with the Ribbon SBC. However I’m clearly doing it incorrectly as it’s not added for the first couple message in to To field.

Ironically this was trivial with a LUA script on the UCM trunk however that isn’t passed though the SBC.

Which leads to the next question of how are you handing diversions to voicemail? Particularly in the use case that you want to ring UCM controlled endpoints, RMA devices & the Teams client then immediately divert to Teams VM on no answer.

Thanks in advance.

All MS has to say on the topic:

If you want to send the call directly to voicemail, attach opaque=app:voicemail to the Request URI header. For example, "sip:user@yourdomain.com;opaque=app:voicemail". In this case, the Teams user will not receive the calling notification, the call will be connected to the voicemail of the user directly.

> On Apr 8, 2020, at 20:45, Kent Roberts <kent@fredf.org> wrote:
>
> ?I’d like to see a working config as well
>
>
> Kent
>
>> On Apr 8, 2020, at 16:06, Carlos G Mendioroz via cisco-voip <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>>
>> ?Oh, I've got to the point that SIP options do flow, and even INVITEs but
>> blow up on answer. (i.e past the cert thingy)
>>
>> Had to fix ips -> names via profiles, but was fighting with SRTP -> RTP
>> issues. TLS does make (for me) the troubleshooting more convoluted.
>>
>> Would love to see a working config :) I was trying to have CUBE doing
>> CME too for a small office integration with Teams.
>>
>> -Carlos
>>
>>
>> Brian Meade @ 08/04/2020 18:52 -0300 dixit:
>>> It should be pretty similar to most SIP CUBE configurations. The main
>>> difference is you'll need to do Mutual TLS SIP with Microsoft so you'll
>>> need a public certificate on the CUBE that the SIP-UA can use. You also
>>> need a public IP on the CUBE and corresponding DNS records that
>>> Microsoft side can reference.
>>>
>>> I don't have a sanitized config I can share. How far have you gotten
>>> with your configuration?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:25 AM Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@acm.org
>>> <mailto:tron@acm.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Brian,
>>> would you care to comment "the right configuration" part of this ?
>>> I've tried to setup it and failed misserably :(
>>>
>>> TIA,
>>> -Carlos
>>>
>>> Brian Meade @ 24/03/2020 20:27 -0300 dixit:
>>>> Cisco CUBE can be used for this as well.
>>>>
>>>> Official documentation should be coming in the near future but you can
>>>> do it now with the right configuration.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:07 PM UC Penguin <gentoo@ucpenguin.com
>>> <mailto:gentoo@ucpenguin.com>
>>>> <mailto:gentoo@ucpenguin.com <mailto:gentoo@ucpenguin.com>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have an experience with setting up interop between
>>>> CUCM/Microsoft Teams with Direct Routing?
>>>>
>>>> If so what (supported) SBC did you use and what if any issues did
>>>> you encounter?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
>>> <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@acm.org <mailto:tron@acm.org>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip