Mailing List Archive

[nsp] 12.2(11)T
Hello,


It seems that 12.2(11)T has been released, does anyone tested it?

any new bug that we should know?


Ezeq.
Re: [nsp] 12.2(11)T [ In reply to ]
bleeding T code is bound to be buggy.
what are you running now? why are you wanting to upgrade?

joshd


> Hello,
>
>
> It seems that 12.2(11)T has been released, does anyone tested it?
>
> any new bug that we should know?
>
>
> Ezeq.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
Re: [nsp] 12.2(11)T [ In reply to ]
12.2(8)T4.


With this version (8T4), I have a big problem, if a get one route from
OSPF and the same route from BGP, the router show me "RIB Failure" and
bgp process remove this prefix from the RIB.

It seems to be a bug.


ezequiel



On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 15:51, Josh Duffek wrote:
> bleeding T code is bound to be buggy.
> what are you running now? why are you wanting to upgrade?
>
> joshd
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > It seems that 12.2(11)T has been released, does anyone tested it?
> >
> > any new bug that we should know?
> >
> >
> > Ezeq.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
>
Re: [nsp] 12.2(11)T [ In reply to ]
Ezequiel,

Please refer to CSCdx26714.

At 04:12 PM 8/16/2002 -0300, Ezequiel Carson wrote:
>12.2(8)T4.
>
>
>With this version (8T4), I have a big problem, if a get one route from
>OSPF and the same route from BGP, the router show me "RIB Failure" and
>bgp process remove this prefix from the RIB.
>
>It seems to be a bug.
>
>
>ezequiel
>
>
>
>On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 15:51, Josh Duffek wrote:
> > bleeding T code is bound to be buggy.
> > what are you running now? why are you wanting to upgrade?
> >
> > joshd
> >
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >
> > > It seems that 12.2(11)T has been released, does anyone tested it?
> > >
> > > any new bug that we should know?
> > >
> > >
> > > Ezeq.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Harold Ritter, CCIE 4168
Advanced Network Services - ISP East
Cisco Systems
300 Apollo Drive
Chelmsford, MA 01824 USA
Phone: 978 497 3129
Fax: 978 497 3129
Cisco Systems- "Empowering the Internet Generation."
Re: [nsp] 12.2(11)T [ In reply to ]
Harlod:
I see, thanks.

Do you know if this bug will be solved?


Ezeq.

On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 16:36, Harold Ritter wrote:
> Ezequiel,
>
> Please refer to CSCdx26714.
>
> At 04:12 PM 8/16/2002 -0300, Ezequiel Carson wrote:
> >12.2(8)T4.
> >
> >
> >With this version (8T4), I have a big problem, if a get one route from
> >OSPF and the same route from BGP, the router show me "RIB Failure" and
> >bgp process remove this prefix from the RIB.
> >
> >It seems to be a bug.
> >
> >
> >ezequiel
> >
> >
> >
> >On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 15:51, Josh Duffek wrote:
> > > bleeding T code is bound to be buggy.
> > > what are you running now? why are you wanting to upgrade?
> > >
> > > joshd
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It seems that 12.2(11)T has been released, does anyone tested it?
> > > >
> > > > any new bug that we should know?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ezeq.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> >http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> Harold Ritter, CCIE 4168
> Advanced Network Services - ISP East
> Cisco Systems
> 300 Apollo Drive
> Chelmsford, MA 01824 USA
> Phone: 978 497 3129
> Fax: 978 497 3129
> Cisco Systems- "Empowering the Internet Generation."
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
Re: [nsp] 12.2(11)T [ In reply to ]
It has been integrated in 12.2(10.07)T1.

At 04:56 PM 8/16/2002 -0300, Ezequiel Carson wrote:
>Harlod:
> I see, thanks.
>
> Do you know if this bug will be solved?
>
>
>Ezeq.
>
>On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 16:36, Harold Ritter wrote:
> > Ezequiel,
> >
> > Please refer to CSCdx26714.
> >
> > At 04:12 PM 8/16/2002 -0300, Ezequiel Carson wrote:
> > >12.2(8)T4.
> > >
> > >
> > >With this version (8T4), I have a big problem, if a get one route from
> > >OSPF and the same route from BGP, the router show me "RIB Failure" and
> > >bgp process remove this prefix from the RIB.
> > >
> > >It seems to be a bug.
> > >
> > >
> > >ezequiel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 15:51, Josh Duffek wrote:
> > > > bleeding T code is bound to be buggy.
> > > > what are you running now? why are you wanting to upgrade?
> > > >
> > > > joshd
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems that 12.2(11)T has been released, does anyone tested it?
> > > > >
> > > > > any new bug that we should know?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ezeq.
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > > > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > >http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> > Harold Ritter, CCIE 4168
> > Advanced Network Services - ISP East
> > Cisco Systems
> > 300 Apollo Drive
> > Chelmsford, MA 01824 USA
> > Phone: 978 497 3129
> > Fax: 978 497 3129
> > Cisco Systems- "Empowering the Internet Generation."
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >

Harold Ritter, CCIE 4168
Advanced Network Services - ISP East
Cisco Systems
300 Apollo Drive
Chelmsford, MA 01824 USA
Phone: 978 497 3129
Fax: 978 497 3129
Cisco Systems- "Empowering the Internet Generation."
Re: [nsp] 12.2(11)T [ In reply to ]
Just a question: when and thy this behaviour was introduced ?
Not the bug, but the fact that if the IGP and BGP next-hop differ, than
the route should get rib failure in the BGP table.
I presume this sould be a 'feature' right ?

Any one needs it ?

> Ezequiel,
>
> Please refer to CSCdx26714.
>
> At 04:12 PM 8/16/2002 -0300, Ezequiel Carson wrote:
> >12.2(8)T4.
> >
> >
> >With this version (8T4), I have a big problem, if a get one route from
> >OSPF and the same route from BGP, the router show me "RIB Failure" and
> >bgp process remove this prefix from the RIB.
> >
> >It seems to be a bug.
> >
> >
> >ezequiel
> >
> >
> >
> >On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 15:51, Josh Duffek wrote:
> > > bleeding T code is bound to be buggy.
> > > what are you running now? why are you wanting to upgrade?
> > >
> > > joshd
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It seems that 12.2(11)T has been released, does anyone tested it?
> > > >
> > > > any new bug that we should know?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ezeq.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> >http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> Harold Ritter, CCIE 4168
> Advanced Network Services - ISP East
> Cisco Systems
> 300 Apollo Drive
> Chelmsford, MA 01824 USA
> Phone: 978 497 3129
> Fax: 978 497 3129
> Cisco Systems- "Empowering the Internet Generation."
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>

--

George Boulescu
Senior Network Engineer
RoEduNet Bucharest NOC
CCAI, CCNA
Re: [nsp] 12.2(11)T [ In reply to ]
George,

This behavior was introduced with CSCdp12004. Read the release notes for
this DDTs for more information.

At 06:41 PM 8/17/2002 +0300, George Boulescu wrote:

>Just a question: when and thy this behaviour was introduced ?
>Not the bug, but the fact that if the IGP and BGP next-hop differ, than
>the route should get rib failure in the BGP table.
>I presume this sould be a 'feature' right ?
>
>Any one needs it ?
>
> > Ezequiel,
> >
> > Please refer to CSCdx26714.
> >
> > At 04:12 PM 8/16/2002 -0300, Ezequiel Carson wrote:
> > >12.2(8)T4.
> > >
> > >
> > >With this version (8T4), I have a big problem, if a get one route from
> > >OSPF and the same route from BGP, the router show me "RIB Failure" and
> > >bgp process remove this prefix from the RIB.
> > >
> > >It seems to be a bug.
> > >
> > >
> > >ezequiel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 15:51, Josh Duffek wrote:
> > > > bleeding T code is bound to be buggy.
> > > > what are you running now? why are you wanting to upgrade?
> > > >
> > > > joshd
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems that 12.2(11)T has been released, does anyone tested it?
> > > > >
> > > > > any new bug that we should know?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ezeq.
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > > > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > >http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> > Harold Ritter, CCIE 4168
> > Advanced Network Services - ISP East
> > Cisco Systems
> > 300 Apollo Drive
> > Chelmsford, MA 01824 USA
> > Phone: 978 497 3129
> > Fax: 978 497 3129
> > Cisco Systems- "Empowering the Internet Generation."
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
>--
>
>George Boulescu
>Senior Network Engineer
>RoEduNet Bucharest NOC
>CCAI, CCNA
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Harold Ritter, CCIE 4168
Advanced Network Services - ISP East
Cisco Systems
300 Apollo Drive
Chelmsford, MA 01824 USA
Phone: 978 497 3129
Fax: 978 497 3129
Cisco Systems- "Empowering the Internet Generation."