Mailing List Archive

PPP UNKNOWN
I'm getting quite a lot of these debug logs for some customers:

Jun 30 13:49:32.465: Vi14 : I UNKNOWN(255) [Not negotiated] id 3 len 43690
Jun 30 13:49:32.469: Vi14 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 2 len 6 protocol (0xAAAA)
Jun 30 13:49:40.841: Vi8 : I UNKNOWN(255) [Not negotiated] id 3 len 43690
Jun 30 13:49:40.841: Vi8 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 228 len 6 protocol (0xAAAA)

Any idea what it might be?

PS: Router is a 7206 (12.3(1)) - used as a LNS.

--
***********************************
Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios
Network Design & Operations Center
FORTHnet S.A.
<achatz@forthnet.gr>
***********************************
RE: PPP UNKNOWN [ In reply to ]
0xAAAA would match PPPoE over ATM using AAL5 LLC encapsulation format.

Is this something you are normaly accepting ?

regards,
Francois

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Anastassios Chatzithomaoglou [mailto:achatz@forthnet.gr]
Envoyé : lundi 30 juin 2003 12:58
À : cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
Objet : [cisco-bba] PPP UNKNOWN


I'm getting quite a lot of these debug logs for some customers:

Jun 30 13:49:32.465: Vi14 : I UNKNOWN(255) [Not negotiated] id 3 len 43690
Jun 30 13:49:32.469: Vi14 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 2 len 6 protocol (0xAAAA)
Jun 30 13:49:40.841: Vi8 : I UNKNOWN(255) [Not negotiated] id 3 len 43690
Jun 30 13:49:40.841: Vi8 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 228 len 6 protocol (0xAAAA)

Any idea what it might be?

PS: Router is a 7206 (12.3(1)) - used as a LNS.

--
***********************************
Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios
Network Design & Operations Center
FORTHnet S.A.
<achatz@forthnet.gr>
***********************************


_______________________________________________
cisco-bba mailing list
cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
Re: PPP UNKNOWN [ In reply to ]
PPPoE (LLC/SNAP) & PPPoA (VCMUX) is done by our telco's router which forwards l2tp
sessions to our router. We just terminate the l2tp sessions.

Is this a problem with telco's router or with customer's modem?

Most customers don't have such debugs...

BALIGANT Francois WANADOO wrote:

> 0xAAAA would match PPPoE over ATM using AAL5 LLC encapsulation format.
>
> Is this something you are normaly accepting ?
>
> regards,
> Francois
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Anastassios Chatzithomaoglou [mailto:achatz@forthnet.gr]
> Envoyé : lundi 30 juin 2003 12:58
> À : cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
> Objet : [cisco-bba] PPP UNKNOWN
>
>
> I'm getting quite a lot of these debug logs for some customers:
>
> Jun 30 13:49:32.465: Vi14 : I UNKNOWN(255) [Not negotiated] id 3 len 43690
> Jun 30 13:49:32.469: Vi14 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 2 len 6 protocol (0xAAAA)
> Jun 30 13:49:40.841: Vi8 : I UNKNOWN(255) [Not negotiated] id 3 len 43690
> Jun 30 13:49:40.841: Vi8 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 228 len 6 protocol (0xAAAA)
>
> Any idea what it might be?
>
> PS: Router is a 7206 (12.3(1)) - used as a LNS.
>

--
***********************************
Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios
Network Design & Operations Center
FORTHnet S.A.
<achatz@forthnet.gr>
***********************************
Re: PPP UNKNOWN [ In reply to ]
These are also some other debug messages we are getting....

Jun 30 14:56:50.513: Vi11 LCP: O ECHOREQ [Open] id 29 len 12 magic 0x1DCD301F
Jun 30 14:56:50.853: Vi11 LCP-FS: I ECHOREP [Open] id 29 len 12 magic 0x00000000
Jun 30 14:56:50.853: Vi11 LCP-FS: Received id 29, sent id 29, line up
Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 PPP: I pkt type 0xAAAA, datagramsize 102 link[illegal]
Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 : I CONFNAK [Not negotiated] id 0 len 0
Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 37 len 104 protocol
Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0xAAAA0300000008004500005C14F80000)
Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0x3C1148909000000A900000FF02080208)
Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0x00486F660202000000020000C0A80100)
Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0xFFFFFF009000000A0000000100020002)
Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0xD510B400FFFFFF009000000A00000001)
Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0x0002FFFF000000000000000000000000)
Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0x00000001)
Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 PPP: I pkt type 0xAAAA, datagramsize 102 link[illegal]
Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 : I CONFNAK [Not negotiated] id 0 len 0
Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 38 len 104 protocol
Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0xAAAA0300000008004500005C14FB0000)
Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0x3C11488D9000000A900000FF02080208)
Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0x00486F660202000000020000C0A80100)
Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0xFFFFFF009000000A0000000100020002)
Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0xD510B400FFFFFF009000000A00000001)
Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0x0002FFFF000000000000000000000000)
Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0x00000001)


Anastassios Chatzithomaoglou wrote:

> PPPoE (LLC/SNAP) & PPPoA (VCMUX) is done by our telco's router which
> forwards l2tp sessions to our router. We just terminate the l2tp sessions.
>
> Is this a problem with telco's router or with customer's modem?
>
> Most customers don't have such debugs...
>
> BALIGANT Francois WANADOO wrote:
>
>> 0xAAAA would match PPPoE over ATM using AAL5 LLC encapsulation
>> format.
>>
>> Is this something you are normaly accepting ?
>>
>> regards,
>> Francois
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : Anastassios Chatzithomaoglou [mailto:achatz@forthnet.gr]
>> Envoyé : lundi 30 juin 2003 12:58
>> À : cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
>> Objet : [cisco-bba] PPP UNKNOWN
>>
>>
>> I'm getting quite a lot of these debug logs for some customers:
>>
>> Jun 30 13:49:32.465: Vi14 : I UNKNOWN(255) [Not negotiated] id 3 len
>> 43690
>> Jun 30 13:49:32.469: Vi14 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 2 len 6 protocol
>> (0xAAAA)
>> Jun 30 13:49:40.841: Vi8 : I UNKNOWN(255) [Not negotiated] id 3 len 43690
>> Jun 30 13:49:40.841: Vi8 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 228 len 6 protocol
>> (0xAAAA)
>>
>> Any idea what it might be?
>>
>> PS: Router is a 7206 (12.3(1)) - used as a LNS.
>>
>

--
***********************************
Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios
Network Design & Operations Center
FORTHnet S.A.
<achatz@forthnet.gr>
***********************************
Re: PPP UNKNOWN [ In reply to ]
That's pretty strange. It looks like a SNAP encapsulated IP packet
that we are receiving. You can see the 0xAAAA03 000000 0800 LLC/SNAP
header which indicates an IP packet and then it goes right into a
0x4500 IP header.

Dennis

Anastassios Chatzithomaoglou [achatz@forthnet.gr] wrote:
> These are also some other debug messages we are getting....
>
> Jun 30 14:56:50.513: Vi11 LCP: O ECHOREQ [Open] id 29 len 12 magic
> 0x1DCD301F
> Jun 30 14:56:50.853: Vi11 LCP-FS: I ECHOREP [Open] id 29 len 12 magic
> 0x00000000
> Jun 30 14:56:50.853: Vi11 LCP-FS: Received id 29, sent id 29, line up
> Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 PPP: I pkt type 0xAAAA, datagramsize 102
> link[illegal]
> Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 : I CONFNAK [Not negotiated] id 0 len 0
> Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 37 len 104 protocol
> Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0xAAAA0300000008004500005C14F80000)
> Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0x3C1148909000000A900000FF02080208)
> Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0x00486F660202000000020000C0A80100)
> Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0xFFFFFF009000000A0000000100020002)
> Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0xD510B400FFFFFF009000000A00000001)
> Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0x0002FFFF000000000000000000000000)
> Jun 30 14:57:08.965: Vi11 LCP: (0x00000001)
> Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 PPP: I pkt type 0xAAAA, datagramsize 102
> link[illegal]
> Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 : I CONFNAK [Not negotiated] id 0 len 0
> Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 38 len 104 protocol
> Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0xAAAA0300000008004500005C14FB0000)
> Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0x3C11488D9000000A900000FF02080208)
> Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0x00486F660202000000020000C0A80100)
> Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0xFFFFFF009000000A0000000100020002)
> Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0xD510B400FFFFFF009000000A00000001)
> Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0x0002FFFF000000000000000000000000)
> Jun 30 14:57:38.966: Vi11 LCP: (0x00000001)
>
>
> Anastassios Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
>
> >PPPoE (LLC/SNAP) & PPPoA (VCMUX) is done by our telco's router which
> >forwards l2tp sessions to our router. We just terminate the l2tp sessions.
> >
> >Is this a problem with telco's router or with customer's modem?
> >
> >Most customers don't have such debugs...
> >
> >BALIGANT Francois WANADOO wrote:
> >
> >> 0xAAAA would match PPPoE over ATM using AAL5 LLC encapsulation
> >>format.
> >>
> >> Is this something you are normaly accepting ?
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> Francois
> >>
> >>-----Message d'origine-----
> >>De : Anastassios Chatzithomaoglou [mailto:achatz@forthnet.gr]
> >>Envoy? : lundi 30 juin 2003 12:58
> >>? : cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
> >>Objet : [cisco-bba] PPP UNKNOWN
> >>
> >>
> >>I'm getting quite a lot of these debug logs for some customers:
> >>
> >>Jun 30 13:49:32.465: Vi14 : I UNKNOWN(255) [Not negotiated] id 3 len
> >>43690
> >>Jun 30 13:49:32.469: Vi14 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 2 len 6 protocol
> >>(0xAAAA)
> >>Jun 30 13:49:40.841: Vi8 : I UNKNOWN(255) [Not negotiated] id 3 len 43690
> >>Jun 30 13:49:40.841: Vi8 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 228 len 6 protocol
> >>(0xAAAA)
> >>
> >>Any idea what it might be?
> >>
> >>PS: Router is a 7206 (12.3(1)) - used as a LNS.
> >>
> >
>
> --
> ***********************************
> Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios
> Network Design & Operations Center
> FORTHnet S.A.
> <achatz@forthnet.gr>
> ***********************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-bba mailing list
> cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|| || Dennis Peng
|| || Cisco Systems, Inc. Escalation Engineer
|||| |||| 170 West Tasman Drive Phone: (408) 526-6143
..:||||||:..:||||||:.. San Jose, CA 95134 Fax: (408) 232-2343
Cisco Systems Inc. dpeng@cisco.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------