Mailing List Archive: Bricolage: devel

[Bricolage-Devel] Re: [Bricolage-Commits] Fixed call to Bric::Util::Grp's add_members() and ...

by david at kineticode | Mar 7, 2002, 6:50 PM | 0 replies →

david at kineticode

0

Mar 7, 2002, 6:50 PM →

[Bricolage-Devel] RFC: Element System Revision Functional Spec

by sam at tregar | Feb 27, 2002, 6:27 PM | 15 replies →

sam at tregar

15

Mar 7, 2002, 5:59 PM →

[Bricolage-Devel] Bric on Debian, Was: problems with postgresql

by mark at geekhive | Mar 7, 2002, 1:39 AM | 2 replies →

mark at geekhive

2

Mar 7, 2002, 8:14 AM →

[Bricolage-Devel] problems with postgresql

by davidu at everydns | Mar 6, 2002, 4:10 PM | 4 replies →

davidu at everydns

4

Mar 7, 2002, 8:06 AM →

[Bricolage-Devel] New Install of 1.2.1

by davidu at everydns | Mar 6, 2002, 2:47 PM | 2 replies →

davidu at everydns

2

Mar 7, 2002, 7:47 AM →

[Bricolage-Devel] Bricolage VS Redhat 7.2, Round 2

by sam at tregar | Mar 6, 2002, 2:24 PM | 11 replies →

sam at tregar

11

Mar 7, 2002, 7:45 AM →

Fwd: [Bricolage-Devel] problems with postgresql

by slattery at angel | Mar 6, 2002, 4:32 PM | 0 replies →

slattery at angel

0

Mar 6, 2002, 4:32 PM →

[Bricolage-Devel] Bricolage VS Redhat 7.2

by sam at tregar | Mar 5, 2002, 8:00 PM | 2 replies →

sam at tregar

2

Mar 6, 2002, 6:19 AM →

Re: [Bricolage-Devel] Re: [Bricolage-Commits] Whoops - wrong patch! Here's the one I meant to send.

by david at kineticode | Mar 4, 2002, 6:44 PM | 4 replies →

david at kineticode

4

Mar 5, 2002, 4:26 PM →

[Bricolage-Devel] Required autoconf version

by sam at tregar | Mar 5, 2002, 3:31 PM | 1 replies →

sam at tregar

1

Mar 5, 2002, 3:33 PM →

[Bricolage-Devel] Re: [Bricolage-General] freebsd

by mdorman at debian | Feb 27, 2002, 7:20 AM | 16 replies →

mdorman at debian

16

Mar 5, 2002, 11:11 AM →

[Bricolage-Devel] On Bric::Util::Attribute

by sam at tregar | Feb 26, 2002, 4:06 PM | 1 replies →

sam at tregar

1

Mar 5, 2002, 11:11 AM →

[Bricolage-Devel] Bugfixes - Media category

by mvella at about-inc | Feb 27, 2002, 12:28 PM | 2 replies →

mvella at about-inc

2

Mar 4, 2002, 6:44 PM →

[Bricolage-Devel] Bug 123

by mark at geekhive | Mar 1, 2002, 11:36 AM | 9 replies →

mark at geekhive

9

Mar 4, 2002, 8:40 AM →

[Bricolage-Devel] Code style: indentation

by mark at geekhive | Mar 1, 2002, 10:41 AM | 11 replies →

mark at geekhive

11

Mar 4, 2002, 4:49 AM →

[Bricolage-Devel] Shouldn't specific workflow permissions imply the ability to see it?

by mdorman at debian | Mar 3, 2002, 1:04 PM | 1 replies →

mdorman at debian

1

Mar 3, 2002, 1:50 PM →

[Bricolage-Devel] How much trouble would I get into...

by mdorman at debian | Mar 1, 2002, 3:22 PM | 5 replies →

mdorman at debian

5

Mar 2, 2002, 1:21 PM →

[Bricolage-Devel] bric_soap and pg sequence contention possible?

by slattery at angel | Mar 1, 2002, 8:03 PM | 2 replies →

slattery at angel

2

Mar 2, 2002, 12:58 AM →

[Bricolage-Devel] Bric upgrading and Bundle::Bricolage

by slattery at angel | Mar 1, 2002, 6:57 PM | 1 replies →

slattery at angel

1

Mar 1, 2002, 7:12 PM →

[Bricolage-Devel] gotta get outta here...

by mark at geekhive | Mar 1, 2002, 11:43 AM | 2 replies →

mark at geekhive

2

Mar 1, 2002, 12:07 PM →

[Bricolage-Devel] Permissions question...

by mdorman at debian | Feb 27, 2002, 3:04 PM | 12 replies →

mdorman at debian

12

Mar 1, 2002, 8:33 AM →

[Bricolage-Devel] Shouldn't bric_pgimport refer to bricolage.conf?

by mdorman at debian | Feb 27, 2002, 1:55 PM | 4 replies →

mdorman at debian

4

Feb 28, 2002, 7:03 PM →

[Bricolage-Devel] Ouch! all my paragraphs got empty on me.

by slattery at angel | Feb 27, 2002, 1:36 PM | 7 replies →

slattery at angel

7

Feb 28, 2002, 10:12 AM →

[Bricolage-Devel] permission setup in bric

by RMurray at about-inc | Feb 28, 2002, 8:32 AM | 1 replies →

RMurray at about-inc

1

Feb 28, 2002, 9:41 AM →

[Bricolage-Devel] [Fwd: [Bug 116] Add mechanism for selection of output channel to Preview an item ...

by david at wheeler | Feb 28, 2002, 9:17 AM | 0 replies →

david at wheeler

0

Feb 28, 2002, 9:17 AM →