On 7/4/09 05:59, brewt@bricolage.cc wrote:
> --- bricolage/trunk/comp/media/css/style.css 2009-04-07 01:28:44 UTC (rev 8558)
> +++ bricolage/trunk/comp/media/css/style.css 2009-04-07 04:59:03 UTC (rev 8559)
> @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@
> div.popup-menu h4 {
> display: block;
> font-size: .9em;
> - padding: 1em, .2em;
> + padding: .2em;
> margin: 0;
> background: #EAEAEA;
> color: #999;
>
The fix for this should probably have been:
padding: 1em .2em;
Only removing the coma. Removing the `1em` rule would collapse the `top`
and `bottom` padding and might not look as intended. Unless the default
was equivalent to the removed dimension. Did you check that this
displayed correctly?
Regards,
Adeola
--
Creative Developer - Digital Craftsmen Ltd
Exmouth House, 3 Pine Street
London, EC1R 0JH
t: +44 20 7183 1410
f: +44 20 7099 5140
m: +44 75 9527 7886
w: http://www.digitalcraftsmen.net/
> --- bricolage/trunk/comp/media/css/style.css 2009-04-07 01:28:44 UTC (rev 8558)
> +++ bricolage/trunk/comp/media/css/style.css 2009-04-07 04:59:03 UTC (rev 8559)
> @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@
> div.popup-menu h4 {
> display: block;
> font-size: .9em;
> - padding: 1em, .2em;
> + padding: .2em;
> margin: 0;
> background: #EAEAEA;
> color: #999;
>
The fix for this should probably have been:
padding: 1em .2em;
Only removing the coma. Removing the `1em` rule would collapse the `top`
and `bottom` padding and might not look as intended. Unless the default
was equivalent to the removed dimension. Did you check that this
displayed correctly?
Regards,
Adeola
--
Creative Developer - Digital Craftsmen Ltd
Exmouth House, 3 Pine Street
London, EC1R 0JH
t: +44 20 7183 1410
f: +44 20 7099 5140
m: +44 75 9527 7886
w: http://www.digitalcraftsmen.net/