On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Mark Jaroski wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Yet another way to do shell redirects. This works better than either
> of the two previous version. The problem with DW's original is that cat
> would get confused since xargs plops it's command line stuff *after* the
> existing command line. I tried adding a single < at the end of the line
> but it turns out that the best way is to just pipe it into another cat.
> The way I'd done it before with echo and the backticks takes too long, and
> winds up ignoring linefeeds.
Oh, heh, guess it pays to read all the CVS messages before asking
questions.
-sam
_______________________________________________
Bricolage-Devel mailing list
Bricolage-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bricolage-devel
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Yet another way to do shell redirects. This works better than either
> of the two previous version. The problem with DW's original is that cat
> would get confused since xargs plops it's command line stuff *after* the
> existing command line. I tried adding a single < at the end of the line
> but it turns out that the best way is to just pipe it into another cat.
> The way I'd done it before with echo and the backticks takes too long, and
> winds up ignoring linefeeds.
Oh, heh, guess it pays to read all the CVS messages before asking
questions.
-sam
_______________________________________________
Bricolage-Devel mailing list
Bricolage-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bricolage-devel