Mailing List Archive: Apache 2.0

Apache 2.0

Aug 29, 2002, 9:22 AM

Post #1 of 5 (2471 views)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C24F78.33A704AE
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Does the current version of mod_backhand work with apache 2.0?

Iman

------_=_NextPart_001_01C24F78.33A704AE
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.0.5762.3">
<TITLE>Apache 2.0</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>


Does the current version of =
mod_backhand work with apache 2.0?


Iman


</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C24F78.33A704AE--

Apache 2.0 [ In reply to ]

jesus at omniti

Aug 29, 2002, 10:10 AM

Post #2 of 5 (2393 views)

Permalink

Mayes, Iman wrote:

> Does the current version of mod_backhand work with apache 2.0?
>
Nope

--
Theo Schlossnagle
1024D/82844984/95FD 30F1 489E 4613 F22E 491A 7E88 364C 8284 4984
2047R/33131B65/71 F7 95 64 49 76 5D BA 3D 90 B9 9F BE 27 24 E7

Apache 2.0 [ In reply to ]

robert.butler5 at verizon

Aug 29, 2002, 10:17 AM

Post #3 of 5 (2396 views)

Permalink

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=____1030641428646_6'VP+yr-mN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

No it does not.

> Does the current version of mod_backhand work with apache 2.0?
>
> Iman
>
>

------=____1030641428646_6'VP+yr-mN
Content-Type: text/html;
name="replyAll"
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="replyAll"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.0.5762.3">
<TITLE>Apache 2.0</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>


Does the current version of mod_backhand work with apache 2.0?


Iman


</BODY>
</HTML>

------=____1030641428646_6'VP+yr-mN--

Apache 2.0 [ In reply to ]

Mayes-Iman at Aramark

Sep 3, 2002, 7:12 AM

Post #4 of 5 (2412 views)

Permalink

Thanks. But of course, that begs the next question...

Will it, and if so, is there any timetable? I would also be willing to
assist in any way I can.

Iman Mayes

-----Original Message-----
From: Theo Schlossnagle [mailto:jesus@omniti.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:11 PM
To: backhand-users@lists.backhand.org
Subject: Re: [m_b_users] Apache 2.0

Mayes, Iman wrote:

> Does the current version of mod_backhand work with apache 2.0?
>
Nope

--=20
Theo Schlossnagle
1024D/82844984/95FD 30F1 489E 4613 F22E 491A 7E88 364C 8284 4984
2047R/33131B65/71 F7 95 64 49 76 5D BA 3D 90 B9 9F BE 27 24 E7

_______________________________________________
backhand-users mailing list
backhand-users@lists.backhand.org
http://lists.backhand.org/mailman/listinfo/backhand-users

Apache 2.0 [ In reply to ]

fred at digicamp

Nov 9, 2002, 5:29 PM

Post #5 of 5 (2391 views)

Permalink

As I'm sure that this is a much often asked question I tried to search the
mailing list archives but I couldn't find them so I guess that might be
question 2.

So what I'm wondering is does mod_backhand work with Apache 2.0? I'm
contemplating the move to 2.0 but first am looking at possible
compatibility issues.