Mailing List Archive: ATrpms repo status?

ATrpms repo status?

Mar 13, 2014, 8:35 AM

Post #1 of 3 (1240 views)

What's the current state of affairs for ATrpms? There doesn't seem to have been much activity since January (either on the list, or the repo., e.g., missing el6.5-i386, F20-x64 updates but not i386).

Is there still life in it?

--
[neil@fnx ~]# rm -f .signature
[neil@fnx ~]# ls -l .signature
ls: .signature: No such file or directory
[neil@fnx ~]# exit

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Re: ATrpms repo status? [ In reply to ]

t004 at kbocek

Mar 13, 2014, 9:18 AM

Post #2 of 3 (1192 views)

Permalink

On 3/13/2014 8:35 AM, BIRD Neil wrote:
> What's the current state of affairs for ATrpms? There doesn't seem to have been much activity since January (either on the list, or the repo., e.g., missing el6.5-i386, F20-x64 updates but not i386).
>
> Is there still life in it?
>

Good question. Interested users want to know. :)

Personally for myself I dropped i386 usage with my shift from el5 to el6.

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Re: ATrpms repo status? [ In reply to ]

promac at gmail

Mar 15, 2014, 3:26 AM

Post #3 of 3 (1181 views)

Permalink

I really cannot answer this question. I had to build myself most of the
packages for F20, either x86_64 or i686. Some of the dependencies were also
too old and had to be upgraded first. A lot of work, but I have a usable
and very stable installation now...

I do not know what are Axel's plans. Only him can state the fate of the
site.

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Kirk Bocek <t004@kbocek.com> wrote:

> On 3/13/2014 8:35 AM, BIRD Neil wrote:
>
>> What's the current state of affairs for ATrpms? There doesn't seem
>> to have been much activity since January (either on the list, or the repo.,
>> e.g., missing el6.5-i386, F20-x64 updates but not i386).
>>
>> Is there still life in it?
>>
>>
> Good question. Interested users want to know. :)
>
> Personally for myself I dropped i386 usage with my shift from el5 to el6.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>

--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ